Flat Rate Pricing For Wireless Service? Patented!
from the oh,-come-on dept
Seems like today's been quite the day for patent related stories. Just as we were discussing the question of obviousness when it comes to patents, comes the news of mobile operator Leap Wireless' patent lawsuit against Metro PCS. Apparently, Leap was able to get a business method patent on offering flat-rate pricing for a mobile phone service. Note that this patent was filed in 2001, when flat-rate pricing was very much the standard for internet access. It seems positively obvious that someone would eventually offer flat-rate service for mobile phones as well. In fact, there were flat-rate, no roaming charge mobile plans well before 2001. I remember AT&T Wireless (the old one) offering such a plan around 1998. Reading the patent, though, Leap makes it sound like some amazing new invention that has wonderfully mysterious properties to increase capacity while lowering peak capacity. So, can someone explain how this idea could possibly be called "new and non-obvious"? Then, can you explain how it helps the market in the slightest to have Leap try to block the competition from offering a flat-rate pricing plan as well?Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
others
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Patent's
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Patent's
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Flat rate urban living surface
A flat rate per square milli-radian of Terran surface.
Oh, wait, that would only work given a non-Mercator(sp) projection based system of land denomination.
How about just a flat earth instead?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I would like to patent...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I will patent...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Read the claims...
1. A wireless communications system, adapted to capacity rather than geographic coverage of the wireless communications system, comprising: an average level of Erlangs per subscriber in a range of greater than about 0.03 to less than about 0.05 in an in-building region; and a building penetration margin adapted to secure greater in-building penetration uniquely in the in-building region over penetration secured in a transportation region.
I'm not sure I know (or want to know) what all that gobbledgook means, but it sure doesn't mean "flat rate cell service".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Read the claims...
I think fault here lies not with Leap or Metro, but that dumb-ass clerk in the patent office who couldn't understand the gobbedlygook as he ok'ed the patent in the first place.
Oh, well... just another example of lawyers taking advantage of our legal systems (and dumb-asses)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
patent review
[--I stand in awe of this clever reasoning--]
...As service is flat rate and pre-paid, there are no charges based upon the number of calls, length of calls, and features accessed. Itemized billing statements may be eliminated and replaced by simple flat rate bills. Accounts receivable and collection activities are eliminated, further simplifying back office operations.
[--profoundly innovative! tell me more--]
...Further, the present invention substantially reduces activation-related costs. The phones of the present invention are sold preactivated. Each phone already has loaded into it a unique cellular number upon leaving the factory. This reduces the effort required to activate. Rather than supplying skilled customer service personnel to assist in activation, activation may be conducted by the customer upon leaving the store.....
[--well, maybe thats clever. thanks for thinking it up, guys!--]
None of these improvements were obvious at the time the invention was made. In contrast, the incumbent business model has been and remains based upon minutes of usage, the time of day, and features accessed.
[--i beg to differ. just because nobody was doing this doesnt mean nobody had thought of it. maybe their cost/benefit analysis didnt come up favorably--]
..By combining these features in various combinations, to expand capacity utilization and reduce systems, capital, and operating costs, the advantages of the present invention are fully achieved.
[--the bottom line: flat rate billing is an ingenious invention that can contribute to more effective use of your company's resources and infrastructure. we gave our engineers a couple of months off after they came up with this one--]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Leap patenting the flat rate on phone service
G. A.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]