RIAA Following MPAA's Lead In Brainwashing Kids
from the why-do-schools-accept-this? dept
For a few years now, the MPAA has had a program to "educate" children by sending industry shills into schools to give extremely one-sided presentations about copyright issues. We've never quite figured out why schools agree to have clearly biased industry representatives go into schools for educational purposes. It's the equivalent of having oil industry representatives give kids lessons on environmentalism. They may be great for one side of a debate, but to suggest it's unbiased information is a stretch. However, it appears that the RIAA is joining its sister organization by putting together an educational campaign for universities that (as you'd expect) is also completely one-sided and ignores important things like "fair use."The RIAA is being criticized for this approach, and are fighting back with ridiculous claims: "First, we were told we should not enforce our rights. Now we are told education is wrong, too. We won't accept such a do-nothing approach. We'll continue to work with respected higher-education groups to engage students to think critically about these issues." There are so many problems with that statement, it's difficult to know where to start. First, the reason they were told "not to enforce" their rights was because it's bad for business to make all your customers feel like they're criminals. Second, no one is saying that "education" is wrong. They're simply saying that one-sided biased information presented as objective, factual information is a problem. Finally, the idea that this educational attempt is about getting students to "think critically about these issues" is just flat out laughable. It would be great if the RIAA wanted to take part in an actual critical look at issues concerning copyright, but every time people try, the industry ignores what they say and claims that everyone just wants to steal from them.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
ugh...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
But..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
on topic though...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
riaa
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Hey Kids!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
why...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Copyright laws are in place for a reason. Just because you and your buddies decided to rip all your cd's and MP3s to a database and open it to the public for free, DOESN"T MAKE IT RIGHT!!! It's still stealing. Just the same as if you five finger discounted it from your local music store. Mebbe when you grow up and actually start contributing to society, then watch as your hard work get's messed up by someone else you might understand.
Jesus, Americans.... all they want is to be entertained and eat hotpockets for the rest of their lives. No wonder the "Most powerful country in the world" is getting it's ass handed to it by a bunch of half educated religous punks.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The really real world
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Rick has a warped view
I want to be able to play music I purchased any damn place I feel like it. No, I don't share my music, but I encourage people to go to places like music.download.com and check out the various artst there.
BTW Rick, I'm not a kid either - try 58 years old
[ link to this | view in thread ]
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4837609090332617729
[ link to this | view in thread ]
good music
my new liking is underground electronic...namely trance house and progressive, with some industrial in there. (although electric goth/goth rock is pretty cool)
i find it hard to find these genre's in any "mainstream" store...either brick and mortar or online.
i'm always looking for new stuff, and places like m.d.c are a great way to open up a bunch of new artists. then depending on how the samples are, i'd be willing to purchase tracks.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
No. It *might* be copyright infringment, depending on who owns the copyright on the files in queston, or if said files are copyrighted at all. I could rip all my Beethoven and Strauss CDs and share them, just as I could my copy of "Night of the Living Dead."
Just the same as if you five finger discounted it from your local music store.
No, it isn't. It would be "just the same" if I had a magic wand and went into my local music store and magically *made an exact duplicate* of something and walked out with it, leaving the original in place. You are confusing intellectual property with real property.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Stands to reason though, hollywood's pretty socialist as it is. Which is fine for them, as long as they are in control, lol --- I don't think it'll last though
[ link to this | view in thread ]
What's the fasination with this stuff?
Plus, there's no bass.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Oh and while were here
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Wait a second...
If the RIAA has its way, we won't have any students left in universities. You know... since all college-age kids are thieves who whine about not being able download things for free without paying for them. And they should all go to jail and/or be shot. Right, Real world Rick? Right buddy? Eh? You're with me on this, right?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Think before you post...
Perhaps it is the equivalent. Did you realize that 80% of all renewable tech research funding is provided by the oil industry? The three largest manufactureres of photovoltaic panels are Oil companies - British Petrolium, Royal Dutch (Shell) and Texaco.
I can see how they are similar-ish. A company which is out to make a profit is having people (literally) steal from it. They may not be losing money as they claim they are, and they certainly should take a more serious approach to electronic media distribution; but that doesn't make criminal actions any less criminal.
If you were fornicating in public (which is a crime for good reason) and someone raped your partner, wouldn't you still expect them to go to jail even though you were doing something you shouldn't (or weren't doing something you should)? This is a far more extreme comparisson I know; but the idea is similar.
The actions of the victim don't excuse the actions of the perpetrator. There is this thing called Knowledge - perhaps you should acquire it. Intelligence helps too, but we shouldn't expect the moon here.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Fair use Vs. unreasonable sale terms
I use national codes in my line of work. When I need to use specific charts, tables or whatever in the field, I photocopy those items and use them where needed. Of course they are never loaned or sold or traded but they are copied as needed. This is fair use and what everyone considers reasonable.
With that said, the issue of fair and personal use must not be confused with the wholesale handing out of billable intellectual property.
Allowing this misinformation activity to happen in schools is an error.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
plus bass isn't that important, but then again, i don't have cornrows that need to vibrate at some ultra low frequency...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
A free for all, fuckem' all!
The RIAA is a bunch or worthless pussies that need to be destroyed by the rest of our courupt political system. Shitcan that damn agency and have a download galore in their name.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Stop trying to rationalize your thievery by complaining about the poor "business model" of the record companies. Yeah, they are behind the curve but that doesn't mean you get to steal their product until they catch up.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Piracy my Pickle
[ link to this | view in thread ]
re: Stop Stealing's comment
What's wrong? Because it's one sideded! It's not stealing. It's been shown over and over again, ad nauseum, that it's not. So that's whats wrong and why it's one sided. Because how the RIAA portrays it is wrong, wrong, wrong and wrong some more.
If the RIAA would teach kids that copyright infringment is wrong, and then show how downloading a copy of a song that you already have purchased really is infringment, then fine. Let the class begin. But that hasn't happened yet. And doubtful that it ever will.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: One sided?
I pay school taxes so my kids can be educated.
No so some douche can waste their time on his employer's tax write-off!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Go Home! Because, your colors are showing.
Either that or your I.Q. is SO LOW you can't discern the difference between theft and copyright infringement.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
with that being said....tuition dollars shouldn't go there. there are plenty of other classes on morals and ethics in the college setting. focus more on underwater basket weaving.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ripping != copyright infringement != theft
I have about 16GB of high-quality MP3s. All are either from CDs I own or from paid download services.
I don't share files (except for the occasional song, as permitted by fair use laws).
I don't do DRM - I will NOT have the music business "manage" my Digital rights out of existence to protect their outmoded and dying business model.
Those songs I do download I eventually delete or purchase.
That's my "real world".
So... are you calling me a thief, or are you trying to turn me into one?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Think before you post...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Then how come the DRM in one of my CDs won't let me rip my legally purchased music to my computer?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
To the sage of morality who posted comment #22
"One sided? What's so one sided about telling kids NOT TO STEAL?
Stop trying to rationalize your thievery by complaining about the poor "business model" of the record companies. Yeah, they are behind the curve but that doesn't mean you get to steal their product until they catch up."
Is downloading music illegal? Yes. Plain and simple. Just like making a compilation tape is illegal, or recording ANYTHING on TV to your VCR. You dont own the programming, it's not your production. But do you think twice about popping that tape in to record monday night football? NO. If you have a desktop background of any nature shot you're stealing that photogrophers work. They didn't give you consent to use it as your background. They only gave you consent to look at it on their website. But I dont see you advocating this point, nor see you making the 180 and never obtaining an illegal copy of media again. The only reason you're for this side of the argument is because you've let the RIAA and music industry convince you that sharing music is wrong.
I'm sure someone could clarify this point more so than I, but music is an arrangement of sound thought to be freely available to anyone. You could take a super computer, put together every single possible combination of notes on every instrument and then copywright it all, thus meaning that no other single indvidual in the world would ever have the right to play music. It's an artform and should be shared to everyone to further broaden their intellectual horizions.
All the RIAA and music industry do is keep artists from making the amount to money they should be able too from their work. Instead they have to whore themselves out for a mere 5 cents a CD while everyone else gets a nice fat cut of the profit.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I Steal Music.
Music is an artform. Art should be done for the sake of art, not cash, and if you look at the recent trends in the music industry, you'll see that there are far too many bands churning out pure shit because they get paid for it. The RIAA supports this practice in full because it is how they get paid as well. Until the music industry regains the passion it once had, I'll continue to download my music.
Now, if my favorite band comes to town, I'll pay to see them in an instant. I'll buy a shirt, a poster, possibly even the CD, so long as all the money goes to the band for performing. As far as I'm concerned, the RIAA won't see a damn dime from me so long as I breathe.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Really Irritating and A$$holish...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Illegal does not equal wrong
To all my fellow pirates out there: Keep it up! Copy an Share! We will force them to change!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
RIAA of course
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: What's the fasination with this stuff?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Oh, one more thing
[ link to this | view in thread ]
#37
"can tell you have not listened to the "Little box that plugs into your ears" if you are saying there is no bass!!"
If you use earphones, there's no bass, if you headphones there can be. If you have a 5.1 surround reciever hooked up to 500w speakers then you're golden.
What I believe the poster was trying to say is that downloaded music tends to be really poor quality, and to the people who are passionate about music understand that quality trumps convienece anyday of the week. So songs played directly from CD's (or rips from cds) sound the best on an actual stereo system.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Familiar?
Sounds like the presentation of the theory of evolution.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: To the sage of morality who posted comment #22
[ link to this | view in thread ]
sure a book can say that this spooky man in the sky made dirt and the rest was history.
the great thing about science is that it knows no humility. scientist will admit when they are wrong.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Think before you post...
Does that mean they would present an unbiased educational program on environmentalism? I don't think so...
They may not be losing money as they claim they are, and they certainly should take a more serious approach to electronic media distribution; but that doesn't make criminal actions any less criminal.
No, it doesn't... which is why we've made it clear we do not advocate breaking the law and downloading unauthorized music.
However, you miss the point of every post we make here. It's about helping the industry recognize they can do much better (and even make more money) by embracing new technologies and distribution methods.
Furthermore, the point of this post was to ask why they get to educate kids from a very biased standpoint.
As for the rest of your comment, I have no idea what it has to do with the topic, other than trying to insult people for no good reason (which, by the way, tends to hurt, not help, your credibility).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Well, one, it's not stealing. It may be copyright infringement, but that's different. If you want to discuss copyright infringement, you should do so in a larger context, including what fair use involves, and alternative copyright issues like creative commons and the public domain.
But, that's not what happened here. And the fact that they position it as stealing, again shows why this is a biased piece of work.
Stop trying to rationalize your thievery by complaining about the poor "business model" of the record companies. Yeah, they are behind the curve but that doesn't mean you get to steal their product until they catch up.
Again, we have never advocated downloading or uploading unauthorized content. And we will not. The point of this post, though, was that the industry should not be allowed to present "educational material" like this without a fair counterpoint.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: To the sage of morality who posted comment #22
I thing I use as a standard is simply - will someone loose money they should get because of something I am doing? Even though they still have the orginial version and I did not steal their only copy - I would deprive them of compensation for use of their work if I down loaded illegally.
I used to put on the eye patch and steal SW until I became a developer. Noe I tend to look at things differently.
OK so the **AA's are hopelessly lost in their business model, but neither I nor you can make them change. Their stupidness does not give us the right to do something wrong. Pretty much their product sucks anyway
[ link to this | view in thread ]
inforce all laws????
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
after 45 posts..
I have read about what is and what is not stealing.
I have read that music should be free for the art of it.
I have read things from as far as oil to religion.
I read the original article and it states an educational program aimed at universities.
Now I will break it down once and for all.
Musicians DO need to be paid. You are stealing if you didnt buy at least 1 copy.
You should fight to get rid of the **AA's buy paying artists directly.
You cannot say stealing because something is outdated is "ETHICAL" stealing is an ethic and its accetably wrong by the majority.
You can record onto your personal media device any TV you can see and if you read the fine print it states "...no rebroadcast and not for money..." Otherwise record away, Thus music should be the same.
The last thing I want to say is that HD-Radio is sweet and so is XM or whomever you like. now... 150.00 US gets you a HD-Radio/XM personal reciever where you can listen to any type of music you like OH!! and did I mention these devices play MP3's and record the music from the airwaves/sattelite directly into themselves and can be downloaded to your machine?
Now with XM you pay to listen every month and with HD-Radio its free(after first hardware price) So in the end its all about your ethic.
I buy my CD's and I buy singles, I rip them to my media devices and I hate the RIAA and the MPAA but to end their riegn I leave it up to the artisit who by the way really needs to fight the record labels who are the real thieves not us.
Just putting in my 2 tracks worth
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Illegal does not equal wrong
haha I wtfbbqpwnd ju n00b, go back to school and bask in my awesome awesomeness stupid fuck, I hope you die of prostate cancer and all your kids have to see you suffer ahaha dumbshit. fuck you and your retarded metaphors.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Familiar?
Uh, no actually. The theory of evolution is a theory based on empirical observation and logical deduction. Nowhere did it say "god didn't make us". It just says that life evolve(d/s). So, yeah. I'd say it's quite objective, factual information.
"They're simply saying that one-sided biased information presented as objective, factual information is a problem." This means that the RIAA is stating its opinionated interpretation of the (questionably) applicable laws as fact. And, I'm sorry. There is no way that they can take a stance on this issue and remain neutral. They are clearly biased, and with obvious good reason.
They just happen to be wrong. And that's not just my opinion. That happens to be a rather common opinion. And it's going to be the opinionated interpretation of those laws by the court system that will finally answer the question.
So no. Not like the theory of evolution at all.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
oh, and my friend Jesus wants to talk to you. will you let him in?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Chris on #37
[ link to this | view in thread ]
If is free....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Illegal does not equal wrong
Your awesome awesomeness apparently excludes intelligence. If you had a functioning nueron you might be able to understand the comparisson. I was not saying filesharing is the same as slavery. What I was hoping you might grasp is that the two things had something in common... that at one point a law said that they were illegal and the fact that that law existed did not make it wrong. Maybe next time leave a counter opinion or some actual thought(if youve had one) rather than saying I should die for making a comment you failed to understand.
Fuck you.. there should be a law against people of your IQ reproducing.. that law would actually help our society.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Hey Rick! You sound about as wise as GW and as out-of-touch with the "Real World" as my Grandma (94yrs Monday - wait, even she is more with it).
Grow up children?
Lol. Bring something debatable to the table and show us how wrong we are for standing up against corporate bullies rather than using the same tired, unintelligent arguments that only work on grade-school children and Baby-Boomer executives and polliticians.
The rest of us will be here, waiting for you to say something that might pursuade us that you have a clue.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Stealing != Copyright Infringment.
Copyright Infringment != Stealing
Oops... sorry. Is that hard for you to understand?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: tarded
Piss off enough customers and they'll piss on you!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
We seem to have two camps here: The It's not stealing because the laws/and or "business model" is outdated. And...
The Yes, it's stealing because it's copywrighted material...
Let's start with the first group. Outdated the laws may be... BUT, the laws are still in effect. Period. If it's copyrighted, and YOU DON'T OWN THE COPYRIGHT or have permission to duplicate the copyrighted material... it's stealing. As for confusing "intellectual property and real property" obviously that person hasn't been checking the most recent cases concerning "intellectual" property. He would have found that ANY money generating property intellectual or otherwise are treated IN THE SAME WAY. In fact, all you have to do to see it is look at the recent suits against companies and individuals who sell virtual items, monies, and properties for real world dollars of of MMORPGs (such as World of Warcraft and Everquest). These items ar considered intellectual property and it is SOLEY in the relm of ownership of the respective game companies. They just licence you to use the items in-game.
Also, there are technologies out there that will help the music (and movie) industry maintain a level of control over THEIR media. Such as the X-chip and RMA imbedded programming.
I think, too, that an explanation needs to be given here about what it is that you are buying when you buy a CD, DVD, or MP3. You are not buying OWNERSHIP of the media, you are buying an original copy and an implied >personalpersonalOWN PERSONAL
[ link to this | view in thread ]
an implied personal use license to use that media for your OWN PERSONAL entertainment. This license extends to making backups for YOURSELF. That's it. Nothing else. Period. You can see this for yourself by NOT FFWDing past the FBI warning at the beginning or the copyright clause at the end of any movie, or by reading the copyright clause on the inside cover of your CDs. You do NOT have the right to make copies that end up in ANYONE ELSE'S hands for whatever reason. If you are doing this, the music and movie companies have every right to try to take measures to stop you. And that includes making "One-sided" presentations to teach kids that copying and giving away/or selling those copies is wrong. There is NO LAW that says that anyone has to present an opposing or competing view when they teach or make a presentation. Hell, our Political and Religious systems are practically BASED on the principle of information control and one-sided views!!
As for the other group... you are right, IT IS STEALING.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: To the sage of morality who posted comment #22
No, no it isn't. *Uploading* *copyrighted* music files which you do not have the express permission of the copyright holder to distribute is illegal. I could upload/download all the public domain and Creative Commons music and films I want all day long and it's all perfectly legal.
And yes, IAALS (law student)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
No, it's not. You have just given the legal texbook description of copyright infringement, not theft.
As for confusing "intellectual property and real property" obviously that person hasn't been checking the most recent cases concerning "intellectual" property. He would have found that ANY money generating property intellectual or otherwise are treated IN THE SAME WAY.
The Supreme Court of the United States disagrees with you. Please see DOWLING v. UNITED STATES, 473 U.S. 207 (1985).
Also, there are technologies out there that will help the music (and movie) industry maintain a level of control over THEIR media.
If I *buy* a CD or a DVD, *I* own it. It's mine, not THEIRS. I didn't rent it, I *bought* it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
No such thing. A "personal use license" on CDs and DVDs doesn't exisit. You are making this up. When I buy a CD or a DVD, I own it. I didn't license it or rent it; i bought it.
You do NOT have the right to make copies that end up in ANYONE ELSE'S hands for whatever reason.
Yes I do. I can make a copy of a CD and give it to my brother, or I can make a CD mix and give it to my girlfriend. I can also parts of a song or movie for research, criticism, or parody. This is all covered under the fair use doctrine.
And yes, IAALS (law student)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
"I can make a copy of a CD and give it to my brother, or I can make a CD mix and give it to my girlfriend."
Making copies for anyone who hasn't actually paid for it is NOT covered in the fair use laws. You find me an actual law, or court proceeding or something official that says you can make copies of copyrighted material and give it to someone else, for free or otherwise, and I'll shut my mouth and say you are right.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I submit to you... If you feel that what you are doing is NOT wrong, or illegal, Why run?? If you really think that the laws SUPPORTS what you are doing, and there is nothing wrong with your activities, Why run?? Answer: Because they KNEW what they were doing was wrong, and that the law does NOT support them... it is just ambiguous. Maybe it'll come out ok (IE they won't go to jail), maybe it won't. The laws and technology are catching up... I for one am glad. I don't beileve that people should have free and unrestricted access to commercial works. (Art or otherwise) I do believe that there IS a time limit as to when something becomes public domain. What that limit is, I don't know. RIAA, and MPAA have the right to control their data, and "intellectual Property". But, I have to admit, technically, on this point you have more support than I do. :p
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Its disgusting
Funny how the left and right often come back in a big circle and almost meet again.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Its disgusting
Wait... that one doesn't exist...my bad, thats the RIAA/MPAA... I always get those confused
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]