Why Is Wal-Mart Scared Of Apple's iTunes Movie Plans?
from the cheaper-cheaper-cheaper dept
A couple of months ago, we noted how Wal-Mart didn't like the idea of movie downloads, since it saw them as a threat to its DVD sales. Since the company sells 40% of the country's DVDs, it's got some stroke with movie studios, and apparently it's been doing the rounds ahead of Apple's supposed launch of iTunes movie downloads later this month, asking for lower wholesale prices and marketing help for when it launches its own download service. Apparently Wal-Mart is upset that Apple's been able to score movies for a wholesale cost of $14 each, and will sell new releases for $14.99 and older movies for $9.99, when it has to pay $17 wholesale. That $17 figure seems awfully high, given Wal-Mart's retail prices on DVDs, but it's possible it's using them as a loss leader. However, simply asking for lower prices isn't necessarily a great solution. While clearly Wal-Mart sees Apple as a threat, it's not clear that iTunes movies really will be one: if they're sold in the same format as its TV shows, they'll have a fairly small market, limited to owners of the latest iPods, really, since they don't look so hot on bigger screens (though it's possible Apple could announce new devices). Furthermore, Apple has apparently only secured a deal with one studio, Disney, hardly making its store comprehensive. If Wal-Mart really wanted to compete against digital downloads and protect its physical DVD sales, why not get behind tools that make it easy for users to turn physical DVDs into digital files they could move to their computer, or onto a portable player? Somehow, given the movie studios' hamfisted efforts at movie-download services, focused more on restrictions than usability, that seems rather unlikely. Perhaps it shouldn't be that surprising that apparently the only way Wal-Mart knows how to compete is on price.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Apple...Steve Jobs...Pixar...Disney
Methinks that Walmart may have a ahard time trying to get Disney to give them a better deal than they gave Apple.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
14$???? HAHAHAHAH
I might be willing to spend 3-5$ on a DRM free download of a movie. 5$ for new releases, 3$ for all else. 1$/episode for tv shows.
Add drm into the picture, and you have to pay me to waste my badnwidth.
Obviously, I don't represent their target demographic...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
have they seen who shops at walmart?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
14.95 is WHOLESALE???
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
i doubt it. i'll spend my money on a dvd if it has a lot of extras, not just some fanboy art that comes with cds.
plus, you aren't able to burn imovies or itvshows. that just plain old sucks. at least you could burn the aac music you download, and rip the drm off of them...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And we wonder why big business is such a problem. Support your local mart people. Wal-Mart is evil (so is Apple, but hey, I'm on the Wal-Mart kick at the moment).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mountain out a molehill
What kind of nonsense is that? I'll never understand the contradictions posted here in Techdirt. I keep reading about needing more competition in the broadband sector to keep prices honest and expand available services/options. Yet, here is a company that is actively seeking lower costs and all of a sudden it is not necessarily a 'great solution'. Huh? Last time I looked, asking for lower prices and passing on those lower costs to the consumer is a wonderful solution. It works for me. And it works for many other consumers.
Perhaps it shouldn't be that surprising that apparently the only way Wal-Mart knows how to compete is on price.
Seeing as competing on price has worked pretty darn well for Wal-Mart, why stop? I'm not buying into the whole 'Wal-Mart sees Apple as a threat' statement. The people that buy iPods and use iTunes are not likely people that shop at Wal-mart and vice-a-versa. Wal-Mart want's lower wholesale prices, plain and simple. The people shopping at Wal-Mart respond to lower prices not more 'tools'.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Mountain out a molehill
Did you read the rest of the post? It makes it clear why prices alone won't be enough to compete, since Apple is offering a totally different product. No one is saying they shouldn't try to get lower prices, and I don't see how you interpret the post that way. What it's saying is that's not going to be effective *for Wal-Mart* and won't be a good enough solution for them.
I'm not sure why you interpret it to mean that lower prices isn't good for consumers. That's not what it says at all. It's just saying there's much more Wal-mart can do if it's serious about competing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Discount iMovies
I won't even go in to the quality difference between an iTVShow and even regular tv and/or my DVR
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Can't see the logic. Afterall, I can't make backup copies of the movies because of DRM anyway - which functionally makes a DVD useless to me. If I can't take measures to protect the media it's on, I may as well not even worry about getting a 'permanent' copy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rent it cheap and if you like it - own.
Now, download to own movie service, should ideally be combined with a rental service. Rent it, and if you like it own it for the additional fee, the difference amount from the fee for owning it, and voila, there goes the market from Walmart etc BOOOOOM (just like Herr Jobs)
I would pay about $2 for rental and less than $10 for ownership. For all kinds of movies (new, old, recooked, whatever ...)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Walmart Scared of iTunes?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hello
It just doesn't make since to have to pay that much spends hours downloading and then only watch it once or twice. Now if there were a service that would stream movies to my computer and only charge a couple of bucks per viewing I might be interested.
Google Video seems close to that model but they don't have good movies only old TV shows and some anime. But I don't think that the Movie studios will ever go for it and change there business/distrobution model. They are a bunch of foolish little cowardly dinosaurs who are unwilling to embrace the future and change with it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Netflix will dominate
netflix, once they start streaming video rentals, will eat up this market. Imagine you can stream the latest movie to your laptop overnight, then copy it onto your video ipod and watch it. after 3 days, the movie automatically deletes itself...all for 3 bucks a movie.
that's the winning business model.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Netflix will dominate
You forget the iPod uses H.264/AVC. Pirates are used to fit a movie in full SD video definition on a CD (650 MB) using MPEG-4 SP codecs such as XviD.
For iPod definition using H.264/AVC, a size of 200-300 MB for a feature film seems closer to reality.
In fact, with a little more than the size you mention, it's possible to encode a feature film in 720p HD using x264, with a reasonable quality.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Vongo has the buisness Model, if not the content
All the movies you can download for $10/month plus free streaming video of the Starz channel. The movies stay on your hard drive until they expire (expiration dates can run from 6 months after release to the year 2013) They also offer Pay Per View, but I don't waste my cash ($3.99 for 24 hours) on those.
Now their technology kinda sucks, their download app is clunky and a memory hog, and the video streams typically freeze up or lag, but the model is dead on.
btw, if you use Vongo, you can close the Vongo app while you are playing a movie or live stream and you will see much better performance.
I run it on a 1.8ghz, 512ram, dedicated movie box with video out to the TV, and I like it much better than NetFlix and the selection is good enough to find something amusing, even if it's not a block buster.
With Vongo, my total TV/movie budget is $25/month for basic cable and Vongo movies. If you already pay $100/month for satalite with all the bells and whistles, then you probably won't gain much by signing up.
eb
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wal-Mart Heaven
[ link to this | view in chronology ]