Clear Channel Wants To Relax Ownership Rules; Or Its Elected Friends Say The Public Will Be At Risk
from the more-more-more-more dept
Clear Channel's overwhelming ownership of radio stations in many markets leads to an awful lot of criticism who feel the company has taken over the airwaves, often bringing the quality down to the lowest common denominator and even removing the "local" from local DJs. So, it may upset people to read that Matthew Lasar has alerted us that Clear Channel is working hard to change FCC rules to allow it to take possession of even more radio stations in certain markets. However, the company does have a reasonable point. Unlike just a few years ago, there are many more legitimate competitors to the traditional terrestrial radio market -- and the old rules limiting ownership in a market may not make nearly as much sense any more. Where the story gets a bit weird, though, is in the political support Clear Channel has lined up behind its proposal. The quotes from politicians include some bizarre claims about how important it is for the FCC to allow Clear Channel to own 10 radio stations in New York City rather than 8. Apparently, without that change, free terrestrial radio won't be "capable of fulfilling its public interest responsibilities," according to Rep. Fred Upton of Illinois. Not only that, but a group of elected officials together filed a combined letter stating that "Given Americans' reliance on free for both local news and community-oriented programming, as well as essential 'lifeline' information during emergencies, natural disasters, we urge the FCC to address this evolving market situation." Are they really suggesting that if Clear Channel remains stuck with only 8 stations in a city, radio will somehow be less of a "lifeline" of information during emergencies? It's not clear that these limits still make sense any more, given the additional competition from many different directions -- but with such hyperbole in support of Clear Channel's position, it might make you wonder what's wrong with just being honest?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
For the children
They must have 2 more channels for the children. The children will starve in the streets with flys dancing on their eyeballs if clearchannel isn't awarded the right to own two more channels. The public school systems will collapse into dark chaos if clearchannel only owns 8 stations.
Obviously, this piece of legislation must get passed. Noone wants to be responsible for allowing above atrocities to come to pass, so the piece of leglislation WILL get passed. It MUST. It's for the children.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: For the children
For example:
Infant mortality
Poor schools
National Debt that their children will not even be able to pay
A nearly collapsed social security system by the time they need it, which they will pay a ton of money for. I feel bad for the children because all that it looks like they are really getting is awful DRM and another couple radio stations. Oh don't forget that they are also getting a crash course in intelligent design and being cooperative consumers.
Teacher:
“now johnny, can you say “bah, bah”
Student: “Bah Bah”
Principal: “Wow Mrs. Choderstone, you are doing a fantastic job teaching Johnny to sound like a sheep.”
Teacher: “Well Mr. FrankenFurker, you will just have to come back next week when I teach Johnny how to grab his ankles and say, George Bush.”
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You know...
Think about it for a minute. This company, ClearChannel, continues buying radio stations and reduces them to drivel, (hypothetically of course), and then continues to try and change the FCC to allow themselves to buy MORE radio stations and thus reduce them to drivel of course.
People will, eventually, just stop listening to the radio stations which are owned by Clear Channel, which will eliminate any profit earned via the Radio Commercials played on stations owned. Company then goes bankrupt, and the next owners of the stations (hopefully) learn from the mistakes of clear channel.
It's a typical case of corporate greed, and in my opinion, if we just allow this to happen rather than try and fight it, (which also gives clear channel more publicity, good, bad, or ugly) we will end up with a better system in place (at least for a little while)
Again citing the microsoft anti-trust case, I can remember that being one of the top stories in the news while it was happening. Microsoft gained a lot of publicity from that case, and in the end, wasn't really hurt, only split up.
We all know Windows is S*** but we all use it. By splitting up microsoft all the courts did, was now put TWO big name companies out there both of which are turning out crap products at an unbelievable rate.
However, (and forgive me for not knowing the actual percentages). the 'nix systems are starting to grab a greater share in the computing world, and although not as user friendly as a windows box, (Unix like OS's are really a pain in the arse requiring a lot of manual configuration), they are also learning from microsoft's mistakes. AND They are making their products more and more user friendly every release.
I think we can apply this same model to the Radio community.
(Sorry that my post ran off topic on such a tangent, but I feel it's related)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You know...
The EU did "split" MediaPlayer from windows, but that is about it.
Also, you may want to rethink this"they are also learning from microsoft's mistakes." The various *nix systems are learning from Microsoft's success, not the mistakes. Linux is becoming more user friendly, that means learning one of the things Microsoft did right, not wrong.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Observations
During this time, KCBS changed to Jack-FM format. They fired ALL the DJs. No news, no stupid, ignorant morning shows. No opinions. No weather. No traffic. But, the music play is wide and deep, and runs just like a giant iPod on random. So, where is the public service?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
We all know Microsoft is what?
Um, no, we ALL don't think, or know, Microsoft is the above mentioned expletive. That's just the opinion of many people, while the opinions of many other people are the opposite.
I love Microsoft products, never had much of a problem with them. I also like Linux, but can't play my games on it.
As for the story this post is about I agree with one of the posters who said let them purchase as many radio stations as they want. Let the free market decide if they do a good job of programming or not.
But I'm very much against corporate welfare. The politicians should not be involved in this at all, and as quoted it's easy to say that they're pockets are lined with some sort of "incentives" to be saying such dribble. The nice thing is though that most of us are smart enough to realize they're just politicians doing their special interest dance.
I say let anyone that wants to and can afford it buy up the airwaves any way they choose. If the people don't like it they will stop listening, and find alternatives. The free market never fails. It may just take some time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: We all know Microsoft is what?
Not that I don't agree with you, but this was about Clear Channel. I personally, listen to XM, pay my 6.95 per month, and listen to what ever the fuck I want!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You Know
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
public interest duties
You can't support the local need with syndicated and/or pre-recorded filler.
Clear Channel Communications will throw enough money around and get their wishes this time too. Bribed politicians score another against the American people. Terrestrial radio is dead.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Exactly.....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
why do you need 10 stations?
the only time i listen to the radio is when i visit vice city or san andreas.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Satelite
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Clear Channels dominance
Once again changing not only the format but the location of the station to dominate larger markets. How Clear Channel is not considered to be a monopoly is beyond me. Something needs to be done about this dominance of the airways.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Clear Channels dominance
This entire deal is about deregulation, but it amounts to building a govt. supported monopoly or duopoly since it is being done piecemeal, at the behest of the large players.
Side trivia question: How many large national banks are left?
As I was talking about LA earlier, the best station in town is Indie103.1, which is owned by a relatively small player Entravision. I'll stop streaming them if they ever get bought by ClearChannel.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Won't some please think of the Advertisers?
Perhaps the local business can advertise on a billboard instead - nope - Clearchannel owns them too.
Yep - for the public good. Sheeesh.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Clear Channel sucks!
These are the guys responsible for timing all of their ads on all their stations at the same time. That way you are forced to listen to the ads even if you change stations. Why?
Because they own like every fricken radio station that there is. At least English speaking in San Diego.
In addition, these are the same people that have very limited play lists. In fact, you can tell the time of day by the song that's being played. What does this mean to the listener? Far fewer choices of what is considered radio entertainment.
Clear channel owns way too many stations as it is. They don't need more, they need less. They also need to be forced to offer more variety and break up their advertisement schedules.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Clear Channel sucks!
I get so sick of hearing commercials on all the clearchannel stations at the same time!
I think clearchannel needs to cut back on the number of stations it runs. Is there anywhere in the US that doesn't pick up a clearchannel signal of some sort? I don't know for sure, but I would bet there aren't many. Is it just me, or does it seem like all the C.C. stations are exactly the same? It seems like all there stations are just iPods set to shuffle with lots of ads. What happened to the days of promoting music on the air and getting new bands some airplay? Oh, yeah, I guess it got lost between MTV and media conglomorates. Surely we'd all like to think that clearchannel has the listeners in mind when it comes to station content, but that's just not the case. They want more stations to play more ads on and to continue blanketing the nation with their signal. Any Joe Politician is going to vote for this. They have to. We're right in the middle of election season and a nay vote for something that is "for the children" would only warrant negative ads against Joe Politician and he might not get reelected to his big, bad senate seat.
Anyway, clearchannel is bullshit....listen to true local radio if you're lucky enough to have it or just pop in cd's.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
To ClearChannel, with love...
....................,/¯../
.................../..../
............./´¯/'...'/´¯¯`·¸
........../'/.../..../......./¨¯
........('(...´...´.... ¯~/'...')
..........................'...../
..........''............. _.·´
..........................(
..............................
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
exactly the opposite
So you tell me - is having more local Clear Channel stations going to enhance public service on the radio? Public service is more than running PSA ads. It's actually having the station involved in the community, something clear channel doesn't do.
To me, the restriction should be more than how many stations in one market a company can own. It should also be how many markets, total, a company can own stations in. Restricting that to, say, 5 would restrict media companies to having at most a regional influence, and help prevent the amount of homogenized crap on the airwaves and the disconnect between the media and the location it supposedly serves.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Many paths, one destination
Right now all we have is crap. If you want anything of value from radio, youy have to subscribe either to XM or Sirius for ~$10.00 per month; though you will still get ads.
Right now we have many stations with only Clear Channel on them. Like a big monolith that only caters to itself. It has no competition so all we get is more of the same.
Now, putting all else aside, is this more is better mentality all that great?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Congress sucks ClearChannel
The icing is that I work in San Antonio, with several ex-CC IT guys. The horror story about a CC problem causing one or more emergency broadcasting systems to break? Actually typical. CC has paid more FCC fines than everyone else put together for EBS failures.
Speaking of EBS, who's the other vital component of the EBS? Why, it's the telcos!!! Oh, yeah... thsse captains of industry who reap obscene profits because they own the infrastructure (yes, they paid to build it, or at least talked enough people into investing) are REQUIRED BY LAW TO PROVIDE ESSENTIAL PUBLIC SERVICES IN RETURN FOR THEIR EXCLUSIVE OWNERSHIP OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE.
Think radio stations are also required? Nope, they just get fined when the test fails AND the fault is shown to be theirs. These fines can also be appealed, and often go unpaid in direct proportion to the influence of the broadcaster.
We've got trouble. Trouble with a capital T, and that rhymes with Gee, We're Screwed. Hey, at least someone got rich off of the deal, so we do have tragedy instead of out-and-out pathos.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Uh, yes.
That should be obvious.
Can't believe folks can miss something that big and still get elected to public office. It's a shame.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Correction
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oh Yeah....
Wonder, whatever became of me....
I'm livin on the air in Cincinatti.
Cincinatti, WKRP....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Upton is a tool.
Upton, you're a goddamn moron. At least have the balls to admit you're in Clear Channel's back pocket, you money-grubbing whore.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]