The New HP Way: Using Identity Theft To Spy On Board Members Shows High Personal Integrity
from the explain-that-please dept
Following the news that came out late yesterday concerning HP's chairperson's decision to spy on other members of the board, using the most-likely illegal method of "pretexting" to get their confidential phone records, some more details are emerging. First, Tom Perkin's letter to the board describing his side of the story has been posted to the Smoking Gun and is worth a read. However, much more interesting is the official HP stance on the matter. Some used our comments to point to statements such as the one from HP's "Chief Privacy Officer" noting that "First and foremost is that privacy is actually a core value at HP. As a company, HP is 100 percent committed to excellence in consumer and employee privacy..." while others have noted how far HP leadership has traveled from its roots in "the HP Way." However, the scariest may be how HP's spokesperson defended this whole mess: "We believe that persons at all levels within the company - directors, officers and employees - must be held accountable and have the highest personal integrity." This isn't the spokesperson's explanation for why the board is telling Chairwoman Patricia Dunn she needs to resign, but in defending the board's decision (which kicked off this mess) not to renominate long time board member George Keyworth due to his "leak" of info to the press.So, if it's the "highest personal integrity" that HP strives for, can we compare the two candidates here? On one side we have Keyworth, who's offense was to leak to CNET News.com this sentence about a gathering by the HP board: "By the time the lectures were done at 10 p.m., we were pooped and went to bed." Keyworth did also discuss some extremely general strategies the company was taking (HP might buy some companies) -- but nothing particularly revealing. On the other side, we've got Dunn, who hired a private investigator to pretend to be each board member in order to illegally obtain their private phone records (home and mobile phones) to figure out who had called the News.com reporter. Whether that's "pretexting," identity theft or just garden variety fraud, it certainly seems a lot more questionable on the "personal integrity" scale than chatting with a reporter. Even if leaking the info was wrong, it's hard to see how anyone (especially Dunn) can defend the pushing out of Keyworth on "integrity" issues after his actions were discovered using such methods.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Corporate officers have integrity?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
identity theft
HP paid someone to commit fraud inorder to gain personal (not business related /owned) phone records of their employees?
Awesome, I should send them my resume.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
identity theft
HP paid someone to commit fraud inorder to gain personal (not business related /owned) phone records of their employees?
Awesome, I should send them my resume.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: identity theft
I believe it was board memebers ... while they are paid, I wouldn't put them in the same category as "employees". It's hard to get higher up the management food chain.
Please note (not that I expect anyone will), I'm not endorsing what Dunn did.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hard to be ethical when you are chasing the mighty
My take: Until we truly hold corporate officers accountable for the actions of their company nothing will change.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hard to be ethical when you are chasing the mi
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hard to be ethical when you are chasing the mi
(often however, they independently (sp?) decide what the shareholders "want" without bothering to ask)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hard to be ethical when you are chasing the mighty
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hard to be ethical when you are chasing the mighty
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hard to be ethical when you are chasing the mighty
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I think Keyworth should be fired
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I think Keyworth should be fired
He didn't even do anything wrong. He didn't actually LEAK any information. When someone did bother to approach him on the subject, he freely admitted to the conversation.
What's he done wrong that he should be fired for?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sarbanes-Oxley - check
Corporate governance concerns - check
SEC - check
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Any company...
Beware of HP.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
HP took their queue from the White house?
http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2006/05/fbi_acknowledge.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Board members are not employees
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What goes around comes around!
Seems they just can't keep their mouths shut at HP.
I guess, it really doesn't pay to leak information because what evil you do will eventually come back.
Not that I am condoning Ms. Dunn's actions. Not in the least, she was WRONG.
The company she hired has given PI's and other competitive intelligence firms a bad name.
Let's see who get jail time/ fined or pays to get out of this mess?
And maybe just to make their week even better, maybe they could have a battery recall even though they say their batteries are ok. But seeing how ethical they are, I am sure they wouldn't lie to us about that now....would they?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What goes around comes around!
But... They all do that. She just gave them the equivalent of millions of dollars in free advertising. I just hope she goes to jail for her actions.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The moral of the story..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No award for business ethics next time HP!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nothing wrong was done
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Your 2 Cents
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Women at the Top
women continues. Glass ceiling, anyone?
Bwahahahhahahahahahahaha
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Another blogger who doesnt take the time to read. I wonder how much Perkins paid him to post this misinformation.
Fact: Dunn did not hire the investigator--she went through HP channels to investigate and was assured that it was all legal and ethical. In addition, ALL the other board members knew and authorized an investigation.
If they used illegal means, then I think the entire board and the HP to management should resign.
Fact: Perkins was one of the most hawkish re the investigation, advocating lie detector tests. He only changed his tune when he saw that his buddy would be fingered. Now he is getting out the spin machine to rewrite history.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
legal compliance and technology
[ link to this | view in chronology ]