Bill Gates Explains Why Microsoft Would Never Copy YouTube.... Oh Wait...
from the knew-we'd-heard-that-somewhere... dept
With all the buzz over Microsoft's new YouTube clone, something kept bothering me, and I couldn't quite figure out why. Then I remembered. It really was just a few months ago that Bill Gates insisted Microsoft wouldn't do a YouTube clone. While this interview with the Wall Street Journal got lots of attention, most of it was for the idea that Gates had been violating copyright infringement by watching unauthorized content (Harlem Globetrotters movies) on YouTube. But, the key part of the quote was: "If we did YouTube, we'd be in a lot of trouble. First of all, people would say, "How do you make money?" Second, they'd say, what about all that copyright violation taking place up there. It's a neat site. I saw a bunch of old Harlem Globetrotters movies up there the other night, it's great." So, um, Bill: How do you make money? And... what about all that copyright violation taking place up there? Thanks.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Slam against Bill...but why?
Serriously, there's pleanty to bash M$ over. The fact that Bill Gates watched YouTube and doesn't think it'd be a good investment (minimal return, legal problems) to try and copy is a slam against him?
YouTube makes money by tying advertising in (esp. front page videos). MS wouldn't make as much money off the ads, and because everyone would be lusting after their deep deep pockets, every copyrighted work that ends up on YouTube would result in a multi-million dollar lawsuit against MS.
The burden of guilt in a Copyright Infringement case is on the Infringer, not the specator. If I buy a shirt that says "Nike" on it, and it was made by a guy with a printer and an iron, no one's going to haul my ass into jail for it.
People follow the money chain. Viewers (even bill!) aren't where it's at.
And lay off, this isn't even something you can REMOTELY slam MS for. Not even close.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Slam against Bill...but why?
he's slamming Bil for hypocracy: on the one hand, Gates said Youtube is nice but if Microsoft did that, they'd run into these problems.
And now Microsoft seems to be copying the Youtube model without addressing the specific things he criticized about Youtube.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Slam against Bill...but why?
Please read the post again. We're not slamming MS for "not doing anything." We're pointing out that Bill Gates said Microsoft would never launch such a service, just a few months before they actually did launch such a service. It's the opposite of doing nothing. They did something right after he explained why it wouldn't make sense for Microsoft to do exactly what it did.
As for how YouTube makes money and the issue of copyright infringement, if you read this site regularly, it'll come as no surprise to you that we agree with you on those points... but that's not the issue. Gates said Microsoft wouldn't launch a YouTube clone for those two reasons... and yet Microsoft still did it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Slam against Bill...but why?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Looks like...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
On To FREEBSD....VISTA SUCKS.... STICK WITH XP
here we go with YOUTUBE now??? I wish Microsoft would make it's mind already. Is it the biggest OS distributor? Or is it trying to steal other Ideas? Both?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: On To FREEBSD....VISTA SUCKS.... STICK WITH XP
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
isn't that concept what microsoft was founded on? steal other people's ideas and then cry bloody murder when someone steals from you?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I must not understand.
I don't see where you're coming from when you talk about the contradictions and hypocrisy. If someone says they won't do something and lists reasons, then turns around and does that 'thing' for those reasons, that is hypocritical is it not? So if a man says he will not do something because of specific reasons, then that's what should be paid attention to right? Basically, where do you see this man creating a youtube clone and ignoring the reasons that he has listed especially of you have not seen the final product. This is all speculation and should be treated as such, citing sources and using quotes would help less informed readers grasp the intent of this article.
To the other people who have commented, let's try and stay on topic, this shouldn't be about your "oh so trendy" association with hating Microsoft because of your parents gospel and the things you've heard though hear-say. Most likely you're not old enough to understand what happened, but you're ignorant enough to run with every radical piece of information you may hear in blogs or post such as these. Please take the time to research and form fact based opinions.
Thank you for the article Mike, I intend to look further into this.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Didn't they say the same thing about the iPod?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Didn't they say the same thing about the iPod?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
As for my opinion, I believe that Microsoft is the BIGGEST COPY CAT of them all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
That model has worked out extremely well for consumers too. Let's hope they keep up the good work.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
this is a little thing called progress.
however, both apple and ms (and adobe, etc...) are rather overprotective of their copied stuff, and for that, they should be (mildly) hated.
and if a thing walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and looks like a duck... it is either a duck, or an ms clone of a duck.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What I wanna know is...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I just don't understand the great MS bash all over on blog 365/24/7.
Check this why Soapbox is a good idea...
http://baxiabhishek.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!8A8DB02C6AB8F265!1138.entry
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Don't believe me? Look up "Straw purchase" on Wikipedia. :D
Oh, and most likely, Bill Gates would most likely win if a lawsuit was ever filed against him, because his money would speak *VERY* loudly. Just look at OJ Simpson.
I'd be interested to know how many lawsuits the MPAA have brought against Bill Gates for watching the movies. I'd LOVE to be proven wrong on my theory that they only go after the "financially weak" in such lawsuits.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I like the soapbox
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Take YouTube Videos with you
Product page: youtuberobot.com
Direct download link: youtuberobot.com/download/utuberobot.exe
Company web-site: youtuberobot.com
E-mail: support@youtuberobot.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Billionaire
[ link to this | view in chronology ]