Whatever Kind Of Computers The Maryland Elections Board Has, We Want Them
from the fantasy-land dept
Following the story that came out last night over the battle in Maryland on whether or not to scrap Diebold e-voting machines in the state, a columnist for the Washington Post decided to dig into the issue a bit. He noted that computers don't always work right, and perhaps the state rushed into using e-voting machines. So, he asked the state's elections administrator (who wants to keep the machines) that question and had one of the more amusing (or depressing) exchanges on this topic that we've seen:Doesn't the computer at your desk ever freeze up on you?There are plenty of reasons someone could bring up why it might make sense to keep these machines (going back to paper ballots could be just as bad, there's not enough time, it'll create a mess that makes things worse at this point, etc., etc., etc.). However, to complain that computers simply never have problems, so there's nothing to worry about doesn't seem to be helping anyone. Unfortunately, this is becoming a political issue, rather than an issue about coming up with the best possible solution for fair and accurate elections. If people can't even be honest about the little things, how are we ever going to decide the big things?
"No," she replied.
Never?
"No."
But surely people in your office have had that experience?
"No."
(Maybe we've found the solution to Maryland's voting problem: Everybody head on down to Linda Lamone's office, where the machines work 100 percent of the time.)
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
That's because...
;-)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: That's because...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: That's because...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
She is obviously incompetent
The fact is, since it's not a 'right' to vote, they can basically do whatever they choose, whether the people agree or not.
Why don't we allow citizens to vote on whether or not our government should use these machines?
Why don't we allow our citizens to vote on laws that pass in the senate?
Why do we allow lobbyism to control our politicians/government?
Are we going to wait for China to rise and overthrow our government and turn America into a communist paradise?
Is that what it will take before people stand-up and reform (err, re-allign) this system so that it actually is a democracy that represents the interest of the people (instead of the lobbyists who control it all)?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: She is obviously incompetent
To truly refute your ignorance though...
1) If you are a citizen, then you have every right to vote. If not, then you haven't tried hard enough or broke the law and have had it removed. In either event, though luck.
2) Citizens time is spent far more efficiently specializing on what ever societal function they perform: quality control in manufacturing, accounting, food preparation, sales, etc. Taking time to educate themselves on every tiny issue in which governments must make decisions upon,well, first of all, would never happen, and second of all, would consume their every waking minute.
3) Relating to the above, its more efficient to elect people to specialize in government and represent our views so that they instead can go forth, learn the issues at hand, weigh them, and make decisions in accordance with the peoples values whom elected him. The problem currently is, their loyalties are split between radicals and lobbyists.
4) Solutions to get people to care would fill a library; impossible, I think, to guess what would motivate our current culture, but instilling civic duty at an early age would create future generations that'd participate.
5) The concept of a flat tax, or a 'fair tax' as Neil Boortz calls it, would effectively eliminate lobbyists to a large degree. At least, they'd no longer be looking for tax breaks as there would be none to be had! Campaign finance reform where politicians receive no donations but instead get government-paid for debate time on TV and several columns in local papers would entirely eliminate the power of the lobbyists.
6) China will never overthrow anybody, you ignorant war-hawk. They're becoming every bit as capitalist as we are and war, especially regime change, is extremely bad for business. Possible exception: Taiwan, but I'd bet the ranch it never escalates beyond screaming. They'd move to attack, we'd move to defend, they'd arm their nukes, we'd remind them we have a thousand for every one of theirs, and everybody would be on edge for a few years.
Try again after studying history, a touch of economics, and getting a small measure of common sense and independent thought. You draw the same conclusions I'd expect from a 12 year old who fails tests like my state (Florida) FCAT test because they can't think critically, synthesize information or deduce anything not explicitly written out or something beyond what the author *wanted* them to think.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: She is obviously incompetent
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nice textbook examples, but we need more
True enough, but after the 2002 elections in Florida we see huge amounts of legal voters' votes ignored (Well over 100,000 people if I remember correctly). Simply put, it isn't that black and white. Wether or not you believe in voter fraud, it takes place all the time. Kind of hard to vote when your vote really doesn't count...
4) Solutions to get people to care would fill a library; impossible, I think, to guess what would motivate our current culture, but instilling civic duty at an early age would create future generations that'd participate.
Sounds like we need to bring back the Nazi! They knew how to indoctrinate their young and make them fight! Seriously though, how would you propose to do this?
"The concept of a flat tax, or a 'fair tax' as Neil Boortz calls it, would effectively eliminate lobbyists to a large degree. At least, they'd no longer be looking for tax breaks as there would be none to be had! Campaign finance reform where politicians receive no donations but instead get government-paid for debate time on TV and several columns in local papers would entirely eliminate the power of the lobbyists."
Sounds like some good ideas here, but as long as money talks and bull$hit walks I thinking your legs are going to get sore. Campaign reform along with elimination of the party system would go a long ways in my opinion, trouble is even if you could get a movement started by the end it would be just as bad as our current system. The problem in my opinion has always been concentration of power, take that away and then changes could start happening. I doubt though the Judicial Branch of our government (The only part that could actually make these changes) will be doing anything that outrageous anytime soon .
"You draw the same conclusions I'd expect from a 12 year old who fails tests like my state (Florida) FCAT test because they can't think critically, synthesize information or deduce anything not explicitly written out or something beyond what the author *wanted* them to think."
I think your hitting the nail with the hammer here. I have yet to see a school system in the US actually get people to think critically. Sure they talk about it all the time, but there still is only ONE right answer on the test. If we really taught people how to think perhaps we could evetually examine politics for what they really are, a bunch of rich shepards herding the flock.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: She is obviously incompetent
someone else already said a bunch about this, but here is a simpler response:
Why don't we allow citizens to vote on whether or not our government should use these machines?
cuz no resonable person would vote to allow these machines.
Why don't we allow our citizens to vote on laws that pass in the senate?
cuz it would cost the lobbyists way too much to buy all of our votes. congress is a much smaller wishingwell to throw money into.
Why do we allow lobbyism to control our politicians/government?
cuz money makes the US run. unless you can afford to get elected, without taking contributions from interested parties, you're going have to sell out quite a bit to get into office.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: She is obviously incompetent
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm scared!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They need competency tests....
They always work.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
well now
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Maryland elections run by Temps hired off Monster
Maryland Election Rovers, in many cases, were hired off the streets with a minimum of "Some High School Coursework".
They are hired by a temp agency off of www.Monster.com
Someone should ask
Why didn't the job require computer experience?
How much was each county charged for these "Rovers".
Was it $1,000 per day? Less, or More? (Often Diebold charges huge prices for election support).
Did these folks pass a background check?
Here are the job openings (in MD) I found when I went to www.monster.com and typed in "election" in the job search box:
Aug 23 EXTRA $$ working on elections!
PDS Technical Services US-MD-Columbia Save to job file
Aug 23 EXTRA $$ working on elections!
PDS Technical Services US-MD-Prince George's County Save to job file
Aug 23 EXTRA $$ working on elections!
PDS Technical Services US-MD-Salisbury Save to job file
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Even I have my bad days . . .
Now, if she just turned the on/off switch to the "on" position . . .
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Properly set up,office computers do NOT have to fr
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Would`nt it be nice
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
deny everything
saying yes would indicate a weakness or deficiancy in their local govt, so as most politicians would do - deny it all. the bad thing here is, whether its true or not, when a govt official denies things like that with like 5 consecutive "no's" right away combined with that we all have come to expect for politicians to lie, says that yes, their computers crash all the time, and most likely every half hour or so...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Computer that never freezes
If you don't install a bunch of software or additional hardware on a machine you will be amazed on its stability. Most problems with computers is conflicts between device drivers or bad memory chips. I've run many machines for years that never had any errors or freezes.
PS: My current computer crashes daily, if not hourly. It seems the more 'advanced' our computers get, the more issues come up.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
are they using linux?
Maybe she hasn't been working there for very long?
My system was running without issue for 132 days until I reset it yesterday for a kernel update.
Ruling out hardware failing, a desktop office computer should run fairly indefinitly as long as the user doesn't have root prilivledges and changes aren't made.
- Jesse McNelis
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
rethinking the issue
In light of all of the issues with the machines on the market, has anyone stopped to think that, maybe, we're making things more complicated than they need to be? Not about evoting, but about how the machines themselves are designed?
I have a PC on my desk running MS Windows XP. Compared to other computers & versions of windows, it is remarkably stable... but it does still crash from time to time. Even if it doesn't crash completely, it gets flakey from time to time. It gets me through the day, but it certainly is not suitable for use in a zero-failure situation like voting.
Right next to that computer, I have a calculator. It has a keypad, a display, a printed circuit board and a processor. It is a small, single purpose computer. It has never crashed. It has never flaked out. It "Just Works", the holy grail of testaments. I have a digital watch. Same thing.
Why? Because they are simple devices. They are meant to do one thing, and do it well.
My question, then, is why aren't evoting machines designed more like simple comodity devices? I'm not suggesting that we run the next election on a pocket calculator... or maybe I am. In a sense, anyway. If all of the eye candy and extra BS were done away with, how difficult is it, really, to maintain a half dozen increment variables?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
On the mess of paper ballots...
Philip Shropshire
www.threeriversonline.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Properly Set Up Computers
[ link to this | view in chronology ]