Is An Ad-Based Version Of Microsoft Office The Best They Can Do?
from the think-deeper dept
It's been talked about in various circles for quite some time, but this is the first time I can remember Microsoft actually admitting that they would consider giving away free, ad-supported versions of Microsoft Office in an attempt to fend off the potential competition coming from other office suite sources. The company has increasingly been facing pressure from the Open Office/Star Office space, especially among some companies and governments that prefer to go with more open solutions. However, it still hasn't taken a serious bite out of their market share. The more serious competition may actually be coming from elsewhere, with a variety of companies starting to offer web-based office productivity tools. With competition coming from such different angles, it's good that Microsoft has realized that it's going to have to change at least some aspect of what they're doing. While a lot of people thought this was part of the plan behind their "Live" strategy -- that effort has mostly been focused on different types of web services. So, the response here appears to be to see what happens if they go lower down the chain with a free ad-supported version of Office. However, it still seems like they may be thinking about this incorrectly. They're talking about how they can use this to "woo entry-level users," which suggests they may not recognize the type of competition they're facing. The real threat from the offerings coming out of Google and a few different startups isn't really that they're free, or for "entry-level" users, but that they allow users to do things that traditional desktop software doesn't really allow. The power of things like Google's Writely is how it can be used for collaboration, not just that it's free. It's good to see Microsoft thinking about these issues, but if they are only looking at it from the viewpoint of "how do we offer a free version," then they risk missing the real advantages that their competitors are serving up.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
sheesh...
microsoft usually has a knack for people who are computer use incompetent. go figure it's google who made is so the dumb ass who can't figure out how to "collaborate" on an office or powerpoint project can.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: sheesh...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
collaboration
If they can link webbased MSO with having a genuinie windows check, or figure out a way to offer webbased office to companies when they have some MS portal software running, they will gladly consider such an option.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
what about people with no net-access?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Office
However, If someone comes up with a truly 'web' centric and integrated set of applications then they will have something to worry about. Especially if they do the core features right and forget all of the frills.
MS Office has become 'feature' laden. All of their applications are full of seldom used features that quite frankly make operating office software more confusing and harder. Not to mention the fact that it causes code bloat.
A little AI research into how people use this stuff coupled with an 'intelligent' applications that 'learns' the users preferences would go a long way towards relieving this problem.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
what?
Were you guys just short on your MS bashing quota or is it just the end of the week and you've already checked out?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: what?
I guess I didn't do a very good job explaining, so I apologize.
I did not say that Microsoft was doing the same thing. Actually, what I was saying is that they're doing something different. In order to combat the potential of Google to compete, they're going to just make their own offering cheaper and support it by ads.
We believe this is a poorly thought out strategic move, as it's reactive, and focused on the low-end of the market, rather than trying to come up with more value to compete with Google by offering something that people want more (not just because it's cheap or free).
So, I also disagree with your claim that this is Microsoft "bashing." It's not intended that way at all. It's intended to help them realize that they can be much more strategic in what they do.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
More Ads?
Back to the issue: how are they supposed to get anything done if they're always distracted by ads? Most of them have the attention span of a flea... What happened to kids being kids and school being fun?
Further, we live in a society that is already overloaded with information and technology and being able to multi-task is the only way to get and keep a job but it's killing us. It seems we have to practice staying calm, relieving stress and gaining focus. Marketing companies with their subliminal suggestions, human behavioural tracking and ways to turn our heads to their way of thinking is already everywhere. I guess they decided the teens buying power (really their parents' money) wasn't young enough, now they have to attack even younger children. Insidious indoctrination.
Microsoft should know better. Obviously they don't pay much attention or give much credence to their competition or they'd have figured out how to manipulate a large pc mfr into giving away computers with their software on it. After all, that's how they got started, isn't it?
When I started working with computers we had dual disk drives (single-sided, single density!) and you ran software on one and collected data on the other. (Anybody remember that?) Magic Wand (I think Peachtree wrote it) was a powerful (as you could get on these sytems) and extremely user-friendly word processor and I've lamented it's loss. We then moved into the world of Word Star. That was after the change from CP/M to MSDos. (Enter Bill Gates) It seemed the harder something was to learn, the more you got paid for knowing it. I remember SuperCalc being our spreadsheet of choice and it did things that Lotus and Excel still haven't figured out. And the programs were all under 100K big! Alas, I don't still have the monochromatic-all-in-one with the old software. If it weren't for the internet, I probably never would have had to upgrade. There was the odd commercial on the radio and billboards were a lot fewer. One could actually think and drive at the same time!
I believe that kids should learn application software and hardware, firm ware, etc., but should not be on the internet in school. The internet should be for home studies and under the guidance of an adult. I think it would be in all of the software houses' interests to offer up free software (I mean contact the schools - not wait for the schools to contact them) so that the kiddies all have an opportunity to check them all out.
"nuff" said.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Open Office rocks the block!
I would have to respectively disagree. I use Open Office everyday and everyone I know uses it too, plus it is compatible with all the major elements of MS office. It has already happened, they are losing their hold. I have heard a few people complain that some features they use in MS Office are missing, but how long until those few issues are shored up? I mean after all we are just talking office software, not rocket science. MS days of raking in the cash for the same old piece of re-hashed software are coming to a end... yea
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: sheesh...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: sheesh...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Who wants to pay $200+ anyway?
Open Source FTW!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ads for the poor
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
OO
But really, I like Open Office (and use it exclusively), but I do not think it posses much of a challange to MS Offce. I have a small business and can cope with the occational wierd way that OO will render an MS doc, but most people are not that forgiving, or are not tech savvy enough and would be scared off by that alone.
But, I have been using more online office tools lately and the advantages of those may be pose a challange to MS Office.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Would businesses actually use this?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
office xp
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
employment
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
business opportunity
[ link to this | view in chronology ]