Diebold Swears Everything Will Work Perfectly In Time For The Election
from the somehow,-I-doubt-it dept
Even if you ignored the history of problems with Diebold's voting machines, and just looked at the problems Maryland had a few weeks ago with Diebold's electronic voting machines, it's pretty difficult to believe that the company will have a "total fix" of the machines in the next few weeks. However, since Diebold's machines have a ridiculously long list of problems for many, many years, combined with Diebold's typically indifferent, misleading or mocking responses to each report of problems, it's shouldn't even be an option to believe that they'll actually be able to deliver glitch free (and secure) machines (note that they're not promising to fix any of the security issues, just a few of the glitches that were seen last time). Also given that last minute changes are likely to introduce new, unexpected, problems since there won't be any real ability to test them, this could just make things worse. Of course, the article about Diebold quotes elections administrator Linda Lamone: "We're not going to use the e-poll books unless Diebold is able to demonstrate to me that they're in tip-top shape." That would be the same Linda Lamone who claimed that no one in her office had ever had computer problems, so you have to wonder what her definition of "tip-top shape" is.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
stupid, stupid, stupid
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: stupid, stupid, stupid
But, I have a much better idea! Since your ability to get your hands on one requires a HUMAN or two to complete your plan, why not just wait on the machines to do it for you? Or, is all this trashing of electronic voting machines really misguided? Could it be that humans are screwing things up, not the machines???? If this is so, is a piece of paper any more reliable?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/2004votefraud.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." --- Thomas Jefferson
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Higher republican campaign security recommended
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Face It
When the prize at stake is the entire world (well USA politicians tend to think that, and act it), flawless voting machines would not stop them from enacting falsification of the results if they want to.
If I gotta be lame and quote the Matrix movies: we're voting just to keep the Matrix stable. The illusion of choice should be always present.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Don't worry. Your parachute will....
But I want my parachute to work before I get in the plane to go skydiving.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They will work perfectly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: They will work perfectly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
wait
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They're bulletproof, apparently
I've been following the research that shows how it's almost childishly easy to hack these things, and how they just plain don't work a lot of the time. Diebold's people must be staggeringly incompetent. Or maybe the management has been making guarantees to the government without checking with the workers to see if it can be done (a la Larry Ellison). Who knows?
Now that the U.S. political system has made such a huge bet on them, Diebold has tremendous inertia in its favor. Getting the government to reverse anything that large is about as easy as turning around an ocean liner with a spoon. The only way that they'd stop using Diebold would be if the machines started molesting children, distributing poison gas, and showing nude photos of congressmen.
Diebold must be very happy in spite of the rotten press!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If that's what it takes
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
@ post 12
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rig Elections For Jesus
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I don't get it...
Shit, checks are still made of paper! In fact, I deposited a piece of paper and ended up with $70,000 in my savings account! If this is good enough for the Federal Reserve why the fuck won't it work for voting?!?!
I just don't get it. We've certainly used paper for the last 200 years. Why the big hurry to change?
O.K. So some retards in Florida ruined our hole-punch, paper, system. Scantrons would still work, instead of holes being punched, which may require excessive pressure for the elderly, they can just use a stamp and stamp the choice. National tests are still conducted by these methods, why not the vote? If it's acceptable for the BAR exam, the SAT exam, driving exams, entrance exams, then it should be acceptable for voting.
END OF STORY!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
One more thing...
The more complex a machine, the more chances of something going wrong.
There are two critical elements to paper voting the mark and the paper. For Diebold machines, the factor is immeasurably greater.
Who is pushing this stuff and why?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: One more thing...
Now, one of the reasons we're given for their continued use despite the numerour problems with the system is that our gov't spent too much money on the machines not to use them, even if they don't work properly. Ah well... this is MD, after all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yeah but...
I believe our elections are far more valuable than 100s of millions or whatever the cost of these Diebold fiasco.
Lets just scrap the whole idea, fire the people responsible, and force a refund from Diebold or they'll face prison time for fraud.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]