Someone Please Explain To The Iranian Government That Anyone Can Upload Videos To Google Video
from the here's-how-it-works,-you-see... dept
A bunch of folks have been submitting the story about how Iran is pissed off at Google over a video suggesting that an Iranian town is actually in Azerbaijan, with government officials suggesting that Iranian people flood Google with complaints. Unfortunately, the article isn't entirely clear, leading some of the blogs discussing this issue to miss the point entirely. This actually has nothing to do with Google (some blogs say that Google maps places the town in the wrong country, but that's not the case). It's actually just a tourist video that someone uploaded with their own description, saying the town is in Azerbaijan. Google has absolutely nothing to do with this, other than being the platform on which the video is hosted. They didn't write the description. They didn't approve the description. Frankly, it seems likely that they couldn't care any less about the description. However, it doesn't seem like the Iranian officials understand that at all, suggesting that this is a case of Google's "interference in the affairs of another country," while a newspaper claims that this is a "dubious" act by Google. Perhaps before they bash Google so hard they should actually understand how the system works and that Google has absolutely nothing to do with the content or description of the video. Of course, that's not nearly as simple as just blaming Google.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
here comes the jihad
At least the Chinese usually know what they're talking about when they want to censor the Internet.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Iranians and Google
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just goes to show
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Conversely
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Conversely
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Conversely
the answer is, no, americans wouldn't stand still - but they'd go after the Iranians and not the service that played the video.
got any better troll questions? I mean at least make it more difficult!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Conversely
Really? So if the video had been uploaded to Google, Americans wouldn't complain to Google, Google wouldn't quickly take down the video, and there wouldn't be a double standard?
yes, no one would care, even if the government prodded us too- but you knew that
So would Google tolerate an anti-semitic video uploaded by an Iranian, showing Jews drinking baby blood? Or does "freedom of speech" in America apply only against Muslims and less powerful minorities?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Conversely
I don't know if Google would even comply..but I'm sure a Jewish civil rights group would TRY to get it taken down.
Regardless.. American government, American People and Civil Rights groups would condemn GOOGLE.
If Iran asked Google to take it down, now that it has been brought to their attention..that's fine. But they shouldn't get all pissy about it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Conversely
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Conversely
Why dont you try it and let us know how it worked out.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Conversely
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
so...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Freedom of speach prevails
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Google maps
Simple error, or a map maker's booby trap for catching copyright violators?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Preseminal Fluid
On another note, don't you find it funny and ironic that these are the same people who started rioting, fighting, and burning shit because they disagreed with the pope calling their beliefs violent? I mean, was I the only one who got the irony here? Oh and what about Hamas calling for a war against America when Israel broke the truce?
Not to discriminate or over-generalize, I know there is a whole other rational side to muslim people (because it's really not just muslims we're talking about when it comes to the middle east - and america's actions over there have much less honor behind them than the 'terrorists' we're fighting), I was born in a country where they are the majority of the population so I'd know a bit from experience, but every little prick in the middle east seems to try their best to find an excuse to yell jihad against america/any other religion/culture.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Preseminal Fluid
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
dorpus..is that Farsi for 'moron'
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: charlie..is that Farsi for 'moron'
http://www.iwab.org/ongoingcampaigns.html
Along with getting their ears cut off.
http://www.sharkonline.org/bullfighting07.mpg
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Somone think of the children!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Discrimination
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Racist Iranian Government is Cracking Down on Azer
The Azeri make up 25 percent of Iran and yet are economically deprived and disavantaged, oppressed and brutalized and discriminated against. South Azerbajian continues to remain under Iranian occupation.
Read more here
http://www.bakutoday.net/view.php?d=21507
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No mOrE iRan
The big delete function. A reverse jihad with no American loss of life. And because if it's not found on google it doesn't exist...Right?
Beside's, who in their right mind even cares what Iran has to say. Aren't they under some type of restrictions, embargo's or what ever they call it now. Shouldn't this include Internet
access also?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lost Tourist
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Story
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Iran was named on of the enemies of the internet just a while back - I can't place the link, but google it and you should find it. I think this is one reason why. It's disappointing to see that a whole government doesn't understand simple concepts that many 15 year olds do.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ha ha ha....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
bold analogy
A drug pusher does not generate a product, but mearly distributes it for profit. Now, it may be that the drug pusher sells legal drugs as well, but that has no relevance to his sales of illegal drugs.
We have a concept of common carrier laws that absolves carriers from liability for the content they carry. We apply this concept to any company that supplies a portal to user generated content. I may or may not like it, but that is the way it works in the US.
On what basis can you assume that every culture buys into this notion that the company making a buck off distribution is not responsible for content? That an entertainment pusher has no responsibility for distributing culturally offensive material?
We are building a real wall to keep Mexican people from crossing into the US, primarily because we don't want to deal with the effects of their presence. Since it is virtually impossible to build a wall that keeps out the Internet's 'undersirable' content (just ask the Chineese and their disappointment with walls), shouldn't the distributers should be held accountable to the local cultures that they influence? What natural law/fundament right protects the distribution company, morally speaking? It isn't sufficient to say it is just how the Internet operates. For now, at least, the Internet is subordinate to real communities.
Did Iran overreact? Yes. Was this an isolated insult? Certainly not.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Insecurity
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Get with the program
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
well
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: well
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That's why
[ link to this | view in chronology ]