Massive Class Action Lawsuit Against Wall Street For Artificially Inflating Dot Com Bubble Rejected

from the go-your-own-way dept

For years and years and years, class action lawyers have had a field day with the fallout from the dot com bubble bursting, trying to pin much of the blame on Wall Street. Wall Street firms pretty clearly did some questionable things during dot com IPOs -- though, it was a pretty open secret what they were doing. They put in place deals to flip new IPOs to drive the stock price higher while also putting out only favorable research on the stocks they brought to market. It was such an open secret that anyone who did the slightest due diligence knew about it beforehand. However, part of what happened was that in the mad greedy rush to cash in on the bubble, no one cared. They knew it -- but didn't care as long as it made them rich. Then, the bubble collapsed and they wanted to find someone to blame. So, while it's a good thing that efforts have been made to stop firms from doing these types of things again (though, it still happens in slightly modified ways), many of the class action lawsuits that were filed in the wake of the bubble bursting were obviously more about trying to pass the blame, rather than accept the fact that everyone knew they were investing in duds, but were playing the game because it was making so many other people money. Most people weren't really being deceived -- and if anyone was deceiving them, it was probably themselves. That's why it's probably a good thing that a huge (perhaps largest ever) class action lawsuit against many of the top Wall Street firm has been rejected. There may still be separate lawsuits against individual banks, but there won't be a massive class action suit to tie them all together. Again, this is probably for the best. People who invested their money should know to have done their own due diligence while also recognizing that these were highly risky investments. While the firms were clearly misleading in some of their activities, and should have those practices stopped, to place all the blame on them isn't right either. A successful class action lawsuit would have put all the punishment on these firms, and then shifted money from them mainly to the lawyers on the case.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Search Engines WEB, 6 Dec 2006 @ 1:41am

    Well....

    That ruling affected only the six focus cases out of 310 consolidated class actions - Those others could satisfy the standards for class-action status.

    Morgan Chase agreed to settle its part of the lawsuit for $425 million, but that could possibly now be revoked.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Reader, 6 Dec 2006 @ 6:26am

    "anyone who did the slightest due diligence knew about it beforehand. However, part of what happened was that in the mad greedy rush to cash in on the bubble, no one cared. They knew it -- but didn't care as long as it made them rich."

    Yeah, if they had walked away with tons of cash you wouldn't hear the belly aching. You play, you pay...

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    hometoast, 6 Dec 2006 @ 7:35am

    But who?

    Bu...bu.. but who will be responsible for the money I lost in the stock market?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Andy, 6 Dec 2006 @ 11:38am

    the firm

    it becomes even more clear that the plaintiffs knew what they were getting into when you take into consideration that the lead counsel for the plaintiff is milberg weiss.

    weiss and his former partner, bill lerach are the targets of a justice dept. probe for giving kickbacks to plaintiffs.

    the idea is that, while lerach was with the firm, weiss and lerach had expert plaintiffs buy stock in companies that they felt were artificially inflating the stock price. when the stock crashed — or even just dipped really — the "plaintiff" would hire weiss and lerach as the lead counsel (because in class actions, lead counsel gets the lion's share).

    milberg weiss was salivating at the thought of suing all of wall street well before the dot com bust... he could see it coming and the evidence will decide if he paid people to play the fool.

    lawsuit abuse is an effing disease.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.