Your Guess Is As Good As Theirs When It Comes To Viral Video
from the making-stuff-up dept
While plenty of companies are turning their attention to online viral or word-of-mouth marketing, many are having a hard time grasping the lack of metrics the medium offers. Not that these metrics are necessarily important in and of themselves, but rather because these companies are used to having readily trackable metrics -- after all, the relatively easy viewer tracking (assuming the numbers can be trusted, of course) is one reason that's fueling the shift in ad spending to online media like banner and text ads. If nothing else, the metrics allow individuals to justify their actions to their superiors, and for departments and companies to justify their strategies. But while it's easy to see how many people clicked through an ad and eventually bought a product or performed some other action, it's very difficult to measure the effectiveness of viral marketing efforts. A spate of recent stories about the popularity of certain online videos illustrated this. The company behind the rankings presented them as an "official" list of popularity, and plenty of reporters bought into the press release unquestioningly. In truth, though, the figures are little more than a guess. By their very nature, it's impossible to know how many people watched a particular video as it got passed around by email, posted on different web sites, and so on. So the researchers used a, frankly, bizarre methodology involving Google search results, surveys with small and non-random samples, and some "assumptions" and "insight" -- or, to you and me, guesses. That's how, for instance, they say the Star Wars Kid video was viewed 900 million times (keep in mind another research firm that's generally better known and more credible, says that the total online population of people 15 and older is about 730 million). But what's perhaps a bigger problem is that they've got simply no idea how many people have seen the videos -- from a marketing perspective, that number's more important than overall views, particularly since with viral marketing, companies don't really incur any marginal costs as the audience grows. This isn't to say that the internet is in dire need of a way to trace viewership of viral videos and other word-of-mouth marketing efforts; but rather that marketers need to worry less about the individual metrics and more on their cumulative, overall effect.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Good ole corporate mentality
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: (To Anonymous Coward post on Dec. 15, 06 @10:1
[ link to this | view in thread ]
20 million game plays
[ link to this | view in thread ]