Blockbuster Weeps As Comcast Offers On-Demand Films Same Day As DVD Release

from the demand-it-and-it-will-come dept

Mon, Dec 18th 2006 1:09pm — Karl Bode

Comcast has been beefing up their video-on-demand offerings this year, launching several barely exciting initiatives such as politicians holding babies on demand and high-definition art on demand. With the popularity of VOD content exploding, they've gained some negotiating leverage with major studios, and are now exploring the possibility of offering on-demand movies the same day they come out on DVD, for the same price as a traditional rental. Tinkering with the sacred institution of theater film release windows traditionally hasn't sat well in the industry, so it will be interesting to see if Comcast has enough financial muscle to move this out of two city (Pittsburgh and Denver) trials. This 30- to 45-day gap that exists between DVD release and VOD release is the bread and butter for brick and mortar retailers like Blockbuster, but becomes increasingly absurd with the growth of VOD and on-line distribution. What is the point of such a release window when the goal is to reach the maximum number of viewers? Just give the users what they want, when they want it, in the format they demand.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

15 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 18 Dec 2006 @ 1:30pm

lol.

b&m stores will be destroyed by 2010!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 18 Dec 2006 @ 2:14pm

more like plastic & styrofoam
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
John Leghorn, 18 Dec 2006 @ 2:22pm

And Still
Yet you can still find these DVD releases on the net WEEKS before they hit stores.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
BlackCow, 18 Dec 2006 @ 2:25pm

How about TV on demand
I would like to see all TV on demand. Make it more like the internet where you can watch what you want when you want.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
bcnewman, 18 Dec 2006 @ 2:28pm

in the format they demand ...
don't hold your breath for that one
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 18 Dec 2006 @ 2:30pm

Just like most film development shops in the age of digital photography, video rental places are going to slowly go the way of the buffalo. However, probably not quite so quickly. Rental stores have TONS of older movies around that you'll never find on VOD. And I doubt VOD systems will be able to archive releases for as long as rental places can. And of course there's the fact that there's an awful lot of people in this world who can't afford fancy cable and VOD services, and just want to rent a movie once in a while to play on their little $40 DVD player and 15" TV (i.e. us poor people). That's not even counting video games and other stuff that rental places have. Granted, something like this will hurt rental stores, but it won't put them out of business for quite a while. Or at least not all of them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
samlakes, 18 Dec 2006 @ 2:55pm

I agree - after all didn't the doom & gloom people predict that movie theaters would be put out of business with the advent of TV???
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Derek Kerton (profile), 18 Dec 2006 @ 3:15pm

VOD Doesn't Have The Selection?
RE: "stores have TONS of older movies around that you'll never find on VOD."

The suggestion that a Brick and Mordor store has better selection than a VOD service is an opinion stuck in 2006.

It's like saying Pop's Corner Bookstore has more books than Amazon.com.

In fact, one of the main benefits of VOD and digital delivery is access to the "long tail" of content. For now, Comcast and friends are limited in what they offer, but VOD has the ability to offer basically any movie ever made, at your home, when you want it...for a price. A VOD retailer is like a video store with unlimited floor space. Within a couple of years, the business models will flesh out, and the content will become more available. There are already numerous stores selling old films on the Internet.

Block and Buster stores are always limited to the square footage they lease...more and more of which is devoted to DVD sales, games, and candy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
elohssa, 18 Dec 2006 @ 3:25pm

But I wanna watch it next week too!
Don't they charge like $7.00 for a single viewing, not counting any sort of premium for a new to DVD feature. I know not everyone is like me, but the movies I buy (often used for
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
anon, 18 Dec 2006 @ 4:29pm

I will never understand the appeal of non traditional music/movie purchases. It is a one time expenditure, and you OWN the media, to do with as you see fit. I would much rather just wait 6 months until the novelty of a new release has worn off, then purchase it on DVD or CD to enjoy in my own home as many times as I want with no additional cost. All this on demand bullshit requires an e fucking normous monthly subscription fee, and usually comes with all kinds of other BS features that you don't want.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 18 Dec 2006 @ 4:37pm
  
  Re:
  That's true, but then that's why I like torrents and newsgroups.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
bob, 18 Dec 2006 @ 4:47pm

The b&m can go out of business only when all business stops. Why, i know enough ppl who still rent tapes. netflix, i agree. but vod is too expensive for a lot of ppl. and yet again there are enough 'downloadable' opportunities out there...for free. what about that? torrent sites, p2p. millions on the gnutella network.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sanguine Dream, 19 Dec 2006 @ 6:09am

Why be scared?
Don't movies already come out on pay per view like a few months before DVD release?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lyle Holmes, 19 Dec 2006 @ 10:46am

I Want My VOD...now dammit!
The reason the studios don't release DVD and VOD day and date is that they will make less money. VOD, with the studio participating in the revenue, is just another source of rental income. The studios don't want the rental income -- they would be happy if rental went away all together. DVD is where the studios make their money -- the sale of DVD. With VOD revenue splitting, the studios would (my estimate) have to see seven or eight VOD rentals to equal the revenue earned from one DVD sale. They are concerned, rightfully so, that VOD will erode DVD sales. Further, streaming/downloading VOD could have the unintended consequence of commoditizing video rentals. If you could "rent" a VOD for $2 or less, why buy the DVD?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Luis, 25 Dec 2006 @ 11:00am

i just get all my stuff on ebay when i want,,i find any used dvd there for 1 penny and just pay like 2-3 bucks shipping and i get my mint condition movie that i can view whenever i want. ebays the way to go for anything.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]