YouTube Takes A Byte Out Of Crime
from the busted dept
A week ago, we reported how a Canadian cop put a surveillance video up on YouTube in hopes that it would help solve a murder in a nightclub. A week later, a suspect has turned himself in, and the cops are crediting YouTube -- sort of. One said there's "little doubt that the extra media generated by the use of YouTube contributed to the fact that this man turned himself in", so it's not clear if putting the video up on the site, or rather the extra attention the case got from the media because the police had done so was what did it. Still, that's not necessarily important, really, but perhaps the experience will illustrate to other police departments that if they want video broadcasts to help nail criminals, they need to go where the viewers are -- and increasingly, that's online.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Kewl!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Big Brother
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Big Brother
What the hell are you talking about here? The "defectives and degenerates" you are referring to are typically the people who want us to give up our ACTUAL rights..no "so-called" or "supposedly" to it. I'm not giving up my right to drive my car because some retard wants to drive drunk any more than I'm going to give up my right to buy "dangerous" books because some fools decided to fly airplanes into the WTC. You seem to be the type that would gladly give up your liberty in exchange for perceived safety; at least that's what your statement above implies.
But besides that, your mostly incomprehensible rant doesn't make any sense in reference to the GP's post. They simply stated that we are now taking back the power and that "we" are the force to deal with, not necessarily our government.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Big Brother
And, incidentally, you have no right to drive your car -- it's a privilege extended to you by your state in the form of a drivers license. Drive like an idiot too many times (and get caught doing it) and guess what -- your license is revoked. If the way you are caught is by somebody obtaining video footage of you endangering public safety by driving your car in a dangerous manner, well, what's the relationship to Orwell's "1984"?
Little wonder you don't understand Mr. Ngo's post or its point in relation to the Big Brother remark -- I would guess you're not particularly well educated if you can't distinguish between a right and a license (a dictionary may prove useful here, if you own one). In fairness, it might be a little much to expect you to offer a rational explanation of why "1984" is in any way relevant to the original article, much less explain in any sensible fashion your apparent view that the government is not "us", given that "we" elect the government.
However, please do feel free to continue foaming at the mouth, as it is really rather amusing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is awesome
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Again?
Carlo, try to be more imaginative. You know, by not trying to make a weak joke out of every headline? Thanks.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Again?
Kinda dumb, Carlo.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Again?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Again?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
youtube
Honestly, you really think this killer turned himself in because of you tube? doubtful, if anything it might of burned at his conscience and actually wanted to take his punishment. The article never stated the perp. (oh, I sound all cop now) felt the pressure from you tube and then decided to turn himself in. I mean, if Youtub is responsible, heck make it an honory turn yourself in if you are broadcast on it...
Got to love hick cops and there new oh-so-shiny new
technology. but kudos to them [cops] for eating tim-hortons and accepting the killers surrender.
p.s. that was the cheesiest title ever btw... =)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Zing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Amen
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If you've heard of the movie 1984, you pretty much know all there is. The lame fake-picture-big-brother and rat-eats-face-helmet towards the end were the only surprises... *eeeew*
I think you should've recommended the book instead.
Enemy of the State was pulp fiction. If you took that movie seriously, you misunderstood it's purpose. Will Smith is the guy that made "I, Robot"... funny, remember? ("Cats did this to you?")
On a side note, last month I took the tracking chip out of my neck and put it in a potato chip bag, but the aliens are STILL finding and abducting me. OH, how could you lead me wrong Will? ...You must be working for the MIB! hey wait a minute...?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]