Why You Can't Go To Your Local Newspaper For Restaurant Reviews

from the why-not? dept

Many times we've discussed the folly of newspapers putting their online material behind registration walls and into inaccessible archives. The obvious problem is that it prevents the site from realizing its full potential by drastically limiting the amount of traffic to it. Blocking off the archives of news articles violates the whole concept of the long tail, which explains how the internet can help companies derive value from their back stock of goods that are rarely seen or read. Rich Skrenta has an interesting post explaining how this error is particularly glaring when it comes to service journalism, like reviews of movies and restaurants. Unlike news articles, which do lose most of their value fairly quickly, the value of these articles endures, as people routinely come back to them when they're deciding where to eat, or what DVD to put into their Netflix queue. As it stands currently, when someone does a search, looking for a restaurant review, they're going to find plenty of reviews at sites other than that of the local paper. This kind of thing should be the paper's bread and butter, as it's one area that can differentiate them from other news sites. Ultimately it's really not surprising, that along with all of the other things that papers do to damage the value of their sites, they would hurt themselves in this way too.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    misanthropic humanist, 12 Jan 2007 @ 12:47pm

    on registration

    Requiring registration is so 1990s. It's probably the single most self-defeating step any website can take and it applies to newspapers, forums and blog comments.

    I see two fallacies at work here.

    Firstly;

    They think to themselves "We have all this amazing content here which is surely worth the small inconvenience of registering for, so therefore people who want it will register".

    Problem #1 If noone can see it from outside no one will want to come in.

    Problem #2 Registration is not a minor inconvenience, it is royal pain in the ass. So much so that I am not interested in any content you want me to register for. Period. The only reason I ever read a NYT feature is because someone deeplinked it or provided a bugmenot.

    Secondly;

    They think that by gathering registration data they are getting some kind of useful view of their readers. This is nonsense. Registration data may as well be random garbage.

    Problem #1 It contains deliberate falsehoods (people want to protect their privacy),

    Problem #2 It contains duplications (people register many time since they forget their passwords etc).

    Problem #3 A poisoned database is worse than no database at all.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Amy Alkon, 12 Jan 2007 @ 12:56pm

    registration

    I register as a 104-year-old lady from the most economically battered zip code in the country if I don't use Bugmenot.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Jo Mamma, 12 Jan 2007 @ 1:16pm

    Re: on registration

    #1 I agree with you completely.

    One question: What's a bugmenot?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    joe, 12 Jan 2007 @ 1:37pm

    What's a BugMeNot?

    BugMeNot.com is a website for getting free login info for a number of popular sites on the web that require registration.

    There used to be a nice extension for firefox that gave you quickinfo for a site you were currently viewing, but it was discontinued.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 12 Jan 2007 @ 2:04pm

    "Requiring registration is so 1990s."

    And yet two of the most popular areas of the internet today, MySpace and Blogging, both require logins to participate.

    I do not go to my local paper's site for any reason. To see more than just todays headline you have to be logged in. Not worth it for me.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 12 Jan 2007 @ 2:10pm

    Re: Re: on registration

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. identicon
    Web content producer (Wingz), 12 Jan 2007 @ 2:27pm

    we publish our articles

    Our articles are registration wall free and are ever removed from our site

    link to this | view in thread ]

  8. identicon
    Your Lost IQ Pts, 12 Jan 2007 @ 2:50pm

    Re:

    "And yet two of the most popular areas of the internet today, MySpace and Blogging, both require logins to participate."

    There's a huge difference between logging in so that what is listed as some person's information on MySpace and other social sites always refers to the same person and the registration required by crappy newspapers and such for some half-baked marketing information.

    Just because two things are superficially similar doesn't mean that much.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  9. identicon
    EdB, 12 Jan 2007 @ 2:52pm

    Re:

    But those require registration to produce content - not just see it.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  10. identicon
    Marios Alexandrou, 12 Jan 2007 @ 3:39pm

    There are workarounds...

    The NY Times set the precedent for allowing search engines in to their gated archives while blocking users i.e. approved cloaking. Any legitimate (and large) news publisher can probably do that same thing and have the best of both worlds. Although I suppose people are going be less inclined to link to gated content.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  11. identicon
    misanthropic humanist, 12 Jan 2007 @ 5:15pm

    Re: There are workarounds...

    "Although I suppose people are going be less inclined to link to gated content."

    Look at what happens and observe the will of the people. When a NYT article appears on Slashdot it carries a warning, it gets very few comments until an AC copies the entire text verbatim so that it can actually be read. On Digg, any NYT story is burried within hours. If I see a NYT link I just pass it by. To all intents and purposes the New York Times is out of bounds and a dead zone. They completely misunderstand the nature of the internet and deserve to rot in their own self imposed isolation.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  12. identicon
    Okie, 13 Jan 2007 @ 10:30am

    The Daily Oklahoman

    The Daily Oklahoman, which was ranked the worst newspaper in America in 1999
    http://archives.cjr.org/year/99/1/worst.asp
    used to have a daily classified search engine. You would put in search terms, and it would send you e-mail when they came up. The of course wanted to monetize this traffic, so they decided to charge $3.25 per search per month. When that didn't work, they removed the ability to use boolean search terms, then they just removed the search altogether. I guess they never realized that online search, while removing an incentive to buy the paper, at least provided value to the advertiser. Now you can manually search their classifieds again, but with all the other options, why bother?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  13. identicon
    econmr, 13 Jan 2007 @ 4:47pm

    Some personal exceptions

    I like, and pay for, The Economist, because there really is no equal in terms of coverage, quality and objectivity, but that's rare, I'll admit.

    Popular Mechanics, etc, I typically thumb through on occasion in the book store, but most of their content shows up in an inferior quality form elsewhere.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  14. icon
    ConceptJunkie (profile), 13 Jan 2007 @ 5:29pm

    Re:

    OK, I'm game. How could a site allow you to make something like a MySpace page or a Blog without having you register?

    If you had to register just to look at MySpace or read a blog, then your comparison would actually make sense.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  15. identicon
    jorrsbm, 23 Jul 2007 @ 3:13am

    21201

    ImTOO DVD to Apple TV Converter is powerful easy-to-use DVD to Apple TV Converter software which helps you convert DVD to Apple TV MP4 (MPEG-4) format and convert DVD to Apple TV audio formats MP3, AAC, WAV

    www.appletvconverter.net/dvd-to-apple-tv

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.