Why You Can't Go To Your Local Newspaper For Restaurant Reviews
from the why-not? dept
Many times we've discussed the folly of newspapers putting their online material behind registration walls and into inaccessible archives. The obvious problem is that it prevents the site from realizing its full potential by drastically limiting the amount of traffic to it. Blocking off the archives of news articles violates the whole concept of the long tail, which explains how the internet can help companies derive value from their back stock of goods that are rarely seen or read. Rich Skrenta has an interesting post explaining how this error is particularly glaring when it comes to service journalism, like reviews of movies and restaurants. Unlike news articles, which do lose most of their value fairly quickly, the value of these articles endures, as people routinely come back to them when they're deciding where to eat, or what DVD to put into their Netflix queue. As it stands currently, when someone does a search, looking for a restaurant review, they're going to find plenty of reviews at sites other than that of the local paper. This kind of thing should be the paper's bread and butter, as it's one area that can differentiate them from other news sites. Ultimately it's really not surprising, that along with all of the other things that papers do to damage the value of their sites, they would hurt themselves in this way too.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
on registration
I see two fallacies at work here.
Firstly;
They think to themselves "We have all this amazing content here which is surely worth the small inconvenience of registering for, so therefore people who want it will register".
Problem #1 If noone can see it from outside no one will want to come in.
Problem #2 Registration is not a minor inconvenience, it is royal pain in the ass. So much so that I am not interested in any content you want me to register for. Period. The only reason I ever read a NYT feature is because someone deeplinked it or provided a bugmenot.
Secondly;
They think that by gathering registration data they are getting some kind of useful view of their readers. This is nonsense. Registration data may as well be random garbage.
Problem #1 It contains deliberate falsehoods (people want to protect their privacy),
Problem #2 It contains duplications (people register many time since they forget their passwords etc).
Problem #3 A poisoned database is worse than no database at all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: on registration
One question: What's a bugmenot?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: on registration
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
registration
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What's a BugMeNot?
There used to be a nice extension for firefox that gave you quickinfo for a site you were currently viewing, but it was discontinued.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And yet two of the most popular areas of the internet today, MySpace and Blogging, both require logins to participate.
I do not go to my local paper's site for any reason. To see more than just todays headline you have to be logged in. Not worth it for me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
There's a huge difference between logging in so that what is listed as some person's information on MySpace and other social sites always refers to the same person and the registration required by crappy newspapers and such for some half-baked marketing information.
Just because two things are superficially similar doesn't mean that much.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
If you had to register just to look at MySpace or read a blog, then your comparison would actually make sense.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
we publish our articles
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
There are workarounds...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: There are workarounds...
Look at what happens and observe the will of the people. When a NYT article appears on Slashdot it carries a warning, it gets very few comments until an AC copies the entire text verbatim so that it can actually be read. On Digg, any NYT story is burried within hours. If I see a NYT link I just pass it by. To all intents and purposes the New York Times is out of bounds and a dead zone. They completely misunderstand the nature of the internet and deserve to rot in their own self imposed isolation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Daily Oklahoman
http://archives.cjr.org/year/99/1/worst.asp
used to have a daily classified search engine. You would put in search terms, and it would send you e-mail when they came up. The of course wanted to monetize this traffic, so they decided to charge $3.25 per search per month. When that didn't work, they removed the ability to use boolean search terms, then they just removed the search altogether. I guess they never realized that online search, while removing an incentive to buy the paper, at least provided value to the advertiser. Now you can manually search their classifieds again, but with all the other options, why bother?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Some personal exceptions
Popular Mechanics, etc, I typically thumb through on occasion in the book store, but most of their content shows up in an inferior quality form elsewhere.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
21201
www.appletvconverter.net/dvd-to-apple-tv
[ link to this | view in chronology ]