More Casinos Realize They Can Blame Software Glitch And Not Pay Out Big Prizes

from the sneaky,-sneaky dept

Thu, Jan 25th 2007 9:53am — Mike Masnick

Last summer, we suggested a new business model for casinos, after hearing the story of one casino blaming a software glitch in order to not pay out a jackpot a player had supposedly won. In that case, the guy was supposedly hiring a lawyer, but we haven't heard an update. However, it appears that others are picking up on the trick. A new casino in Pennsylvania had a slot machine tell a player that he had won $102,000, supposedly "the big jackpot" of the day. Various casino staff came up and congratulated him, until someone else came over and offered him two free meal coupons, saying that the jackpot message (which even stated his name) was a software glitch on their internal computer system, and was due to some internal testing that never should have reached the actual machine. Specifically, they claim it was "a communications error." The article does note that the slot machines have a disclaimer that the casino is not liable for machine malfunctions, but there are questions about whether or not that covers this situation, since it wasn't technically the slot machine that malfunctioned, but the casino's computer system. Either way, it seems pretty sleazy, and probably isn't particularly good publicity for a new casino trying to drum up business. Update: Apparently the casino has changed its mind, recognizing the bad publicity the original story caused. The casino claims that their investigation turned up that the error was a human error, not a machine glitch, and therefore they paid up.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

79 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

KnyghtMare, 25 Jan 2007 @ 10:05am

Won not one
"had won" surely, not "had one"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
billy, 25 Jan 2007 @ 10:07am

casinos
man, why would they go through the trouble of trying to prevent people from getting the money they got for playing there
they rake in so much money anyways from people gambling, whats the point in losing business because you want to keep an extra few bucks

overall, they are hurting their business i am willing to bet =P

and first!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
billy, 25 Jan 2007 @ 10:07am

dang
okay, wasn't first =P
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Bdaniels, 25 Jan 2007 @ 10:32am
  
  Re: dang
  I think they should give him the money and and pay whatever taxes are owed on it just for being dumbasses...
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Rollem, 26 Jan 2007 @ 11:04am
    
    Re: Re: dang
    Paying the taxes for somebody's winnings brings up and interesting issue. In such a case, the winner would then have to pay taxes on the money issued to him to pay the taxes. The casino could then pay those taxes owed, as well, which would cause the cycle to turn once more. Eventually, a casino could keep paying the smaller and smaller taxes until the man comes out with exactly $102K with no money owed to the govt, but it's quite a bit more than the original taxes owed.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Cool Guy, 29 Jan 2007 @ 8:40am
    
    Re: Re: dang
    I think Dave Ramsey calls that stupid Tax
    
    http://www.daveramsey.com/etc/stupid_tax/?fuseAction=dspReadStories
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- SimonTek (profile), 26 Jan 2007 @ 8:05am
  
  Re: dang
  Who does any system work that can cause that type of problem during the day? I was taught if you have to do work on a machine that can cause a huge problem, do it during the night with damage is minimal, ie not many users on the system.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Jay, 25 Jan 2007 @ 10:33am

Casinos are Regulated
This will be investigated by an independent gaming commission, and they will ultimately determine if this is a software glitch.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- anon, 26 Jan 2007 @ 11:32am
  
  Re: Casinos are Regulated
  the "independant commission" are state police and they will not be skilled in debugging software. They will have little choice but to take the casino's word for it. The people of the state voted to let gambling in, so now they can just deal with the corruption that follows. cheers!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
charlie potatoes, 25 Jan 2007 @ 10:38am

casinos are regulated?
do you believe in santa and the tooth fairy. too?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Michael Brutsch, 25 Jan 2007 @ 10:40am

As a programmer for 28 years
I can assure you, by the time the "independent gaming commission" sees the "evidence" provided by the casino, it will be a software glitch. If these scams continue to hold up under scrutiny, it will become a standard feature of casino software to auto-generate a 'glitch' whenever the big payoff happens. That won't keep determined gamblers from gambling, since most people lose most of the time anyway.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 26 Jan 2007 @ 10:28am
  
  Re: As a programmer for 28 years
  I see you don't work in the casino industry. As an IT team member for a major casino corporation with locations in PA (though not the one in this article) I can assure you that the PGCB will side with the patron if at all possible. The gaming commissions in various jurisdictions are there for just this very reason. Their whole purpose is to protect the patron's interests via casino regulation, employee licensing, dispute resolution, etc.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
DalGoda, 25 Jan 2007 @ 10:44am

Glitch or No Glitch
Even if it is a glitch they ought to make it up to the fellow. The machine said he won, and they claim he didn't. Would make me wonder how many times the system may have changed a winner into a loser.

Either way, it's bad customer service and horrible publicity. It would be worth it for them to pay the full amount or more, just to keep the issue quiet. Now people will look at that place with a little more skepticism.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mike C., 25 Jan 2007 @ 10:47am

I'm curious...
Saw this a yesterday through a different link:

http://www.nbc10.com/news/10834746/detail.html

In that one, it mentions "Wilkinson told NBC 10 he saw an ad in a local newspaper that there would be big jackot every day for casino-card holders."

If this guy wasn't the big winner.... WHO WAS?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Buzz, 25 Jan 2007 @ 10:50am

Uncool
Anytime there is a glitch in the system, it's supposed to favor the customer. I work in retail right now. Anytime there is a glitch (whether it's a computer reporting an incorrect price or a human misinforming the customer), the customer gets the better deal. We simply accept the loss and fix the problem. Granted, casinos are different from retail, and there is far more money on the line. Regardless, pulling the glitches excuse is rather fishy. Considering how much money casinos reel in, they should accept the loss and learn their lesson. It's not the customer's fault that the company failed to adhere to all software protocols in terms of releasing it. :(
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- bryan, 25 Jan 2007 @ 11:15am
  
  Re: Uncool
  This isn't retail, and it is highly regulated. It is stated that all errors void pays...therefore...it favors that casino.
  
  I can't speak to the actual error, but I can tell you even in retail, they do not honor typo's in advertising. I seem to remember an add for 2 or 4 gig usb thumb drives for about $20, and the retailer canceled all the orders stating the add was due to a typo.
  
  Had this happened in Las Vegas instead of Pennsylvania, the casino probably would have done a better job compensating the player than a free buffet (as there are MANY other choices of casinos he could take his business to).
  
  It is sad this man feels cheated. However, I guarantee this was not a casino not wanting to a pay a legitimate winner. This definitely was an error, but I can't speak to what type of an error.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
No1, 25 Jan 2007 @ 10:51am

It's worth paying
The casino should pay the man his jackpot. They can write it off as a loss or, if not, they'll make it back 100-fold from the publicity-generated influx of new gamblers who hope another such "mistake" will occur.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Allison fisher, 12 Oct 2012 @ 4:03am
  
  Re: It's worth paying
  My husband won a 2012 Lexus or $35k and never saw a penny. Casino said we were 2 minutes late getting to desk. We had to go by an employee wearing a watch. His name as a winner was still on all the TVs and they hadn't called another name yet. That casino stole our winnings. It was horrible. Sugarhouse is a scam.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 25 Jan 2007 @ 10:55am

@ #1 "had won" surely, not "had one"

Yeah, Mike's posts are crap. He doesn't even spell/grammar check before he posts this stuff. If you can't even spell correctly, how can you trust the content? Crap crap and more crap....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Tom D. Hairy, 26 Jan 2007 @ 8:50am
  
  Re:
  Anonymous Coward Post have nothing to do with the artical at hand.
  
  Pay The Man. I think a Judge would side with the player
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mike, 25 Jan 2007 @ 10:57am

NOT A SCAM
I am going with it was either a terrible glitch or human error. Anyone that works near or in the business of Gaming (Lottery/Gaming/etc) knows that the gaming commission runs an extremely tight ship when it comes following regulations. There are no scams.
The casino does not design, manufacture or distribute slot machines in anyway. What is going to happen is the manufacturer of the machine AND communication protocol will get their asses handed to them and if it was human error, there will be repercussions I am sure.

Now not awarding the man his money is extremely bad PR and probably a bad decision on their part but this is hardly a scam.

-Works in gaming field.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Gaming Comissioner, 27 Jan 2007 @ 6:37am
  
  Re: NOT A SCAM
  Not a scam my ass...ha!...I should know
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Buzz, 25 Jan 2007 @ 11:11am

Re: NOT A SCAM
I believe you, Mike. I don't think any of us are calling you a liar. However, it's really shady to claim it was a computer glitch. Even if the company is 100% honest, this customer becomes highly elated only to have the workers come tell him, "Um, the screen lied to you. It was a glitch in the software." So, what now? The company is honest but now has a reputation for glitchy software.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Kevin Joyce, 25 Jan 2007 @ 11:11am

Well I'm convince
To never play slot machines!! Dice and cards don't have glitches :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bumbling old fool, 25 Jan 2007 @ 11:14am

Can i use that line?
If a supposed "software glitch" can take away one mans jackpot, can't I claim the same software glitch forgot to give me mine?

Then I should be able to sue for some random jackpot that I didn't win, right?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mike, 25 Jan 2007 @ 11:20am

Re: NOT A SCAM
Agreed with there Buzz. In my opinion, they should have paid out and let the **** roll downhill. This would have kept their image.

I believe this was a peripheral attached to the machine that is completely separate from the slot machine. I am almost guessing someone accidentally sent a progressive win command for that particular card player and then went "oops!".
If it wasn't that, then possibly an error in the host communication software...but that is really hard swallow because that is the WORST case scenario. Any decent designer tests against that exact scenario...otherwise the casino wouldn't purchase software that company.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- John Duncan Yoyo, 26 Jan 2007 @ 7:29am
  
  Re: Re: NOT A SCAM
  The real question is- Is this more than $102,000 worth of bad publicity for the Philadelphia Park. It may have been better to pay it off and write it off the publicity budget.
  
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 25 Jan 2007 @ 11:23am

any business tries to minimize losses while increasing income. this is no different. but, how much is that 100k worth? i don't think wal mart would spend 35k a year to hire a security gaurd to stop the theft of 15k of materials.

so does not paying the 100k remove more than 100k from sales? hard to say.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mike, 25 Jan 2007 @ 11:26am

Nevermind, it displayed on the actual game. If it wasn't the machine, I still weigh on my previous thoughts.

I wonder what will come of this.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Trouble Maker, 25 Jan 2007 @ 11:38am

two cents worth
ehr...I thought that each Slot Machine was a stand alone. Each one is independent and that they are not centrally controlled. This has been a well known fact in "Gaming" when has this changed? If it is as they claim, doesn’t that indicate that they may put a computer controlled braking device on the Roulette Wheel, under the claim that “it controls payout”

Bottom line, It is a game of chance, or isn’t it?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Dave, 26 Jan 2007 @ 7:54am
  
  Re: two cents worth
  They don't stand alone. In fact you have multiple machines in multiple states now linked for large payounts on progressives.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Ernie, 26 Jan 2007 @ 10:41am
  
  Re: two cents worth
  Slot machines are not standalone anymore. Machines with "Progressive Jackpot" are linked in with many other machines, sometimes nationwide. This software error can happen if a machine in Boise Idaho AND a machine in Stanford CT both hit at around the same time. In that case, machine A reports the win and then transmits it back to the central server, while machine B reports the win and transmits it back to the central server also. The first one to the gate wins, but BOTH tell the player that they've won. This is why EVERY slot machine says that jackpots must be confirmed by casino staff.
  
  Even non-progressive machines are linked now, as they not only report big payouts (the payout decision IS standalone on that machine), but report how much $$$ you've put into the machine. That is the whole POINT of player cards.
  
  The thing that most people don't understand about the casino biz is that the casino has ZERO interest in fixing the results. They win anyway. They don't care how much you've won (or more likely lost) as an individual, they know that as an organization, they have won.
  
  To explain: Assume you have a casino with nothing but blackjack tables. 5000 of them, $5/hand. $5*0.0062 = 3.1 cents (assuming dealer hit a 17), or $155 / hour for those tables. The casinos generally run 24hr/day, so those tables will make at LEAST $3720/day. AND THOSE ARE THE BEST ODDS IN THE CASINO!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- pat oconnell, 1 Feb 2007 @ 11:01am
  
  Re: two cents worth
  About 8 years ago, the Wall st. Journal had an article that contained many stories like this happening around the country. People were told the machine wasn't supposed to pay off, but most sued and won. If you play slots as much as I do, you will notice the number of times the jackpot shows up on the line above or below the payline, or the third item to need ed to win stops on the line above. I think the random number generator is a lot of crap based on the above observations. The machines are more than programmed tp make a certain payout and I believe they can be made hot or cold at will and that most days you have no chance of winning.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 25 Jan 2007 @ 11:42am

Yea...
For some reason this doesn't surprise me at all...
I never worry or care about such things because I don't and never will gamble...But what this casino is pulling off it is just Wrong...and they will loose business because of this...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 25 Jan 2007 @ 11:45am

turnabout
It would seem that every person that lost according to the machine that day has an agument that they should of won the jackpot because of a software glitch.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
William, 25 Jan 2007 @ 12:00pm

Gamblers gamble
This wont stop people gambling and i doubt the casino will lose any revenue. Some stupid programmer most likely sent the win to a real machine instead of the test machine in the basement or some such thing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
frankthetank, 25 Jan 2007 @ 12:43pm

The software glitched, and we don't owe you money. The software glitched and you owe me money.

I wonder if i can rack up a huge debt to a casino, then say, hey it was a glitch that i got the money, you lose. doubt it.

typically each slot machine is in control of it's own payout, howeveer those attached to a progressive system not only have individual control, but have input/output on progressive systems. unfortunately i'm not sure of the inner workings of the programming for such machines (although i bet it's amazingly cool)

plus there is no real "randomization" in computer programs. sure there are a vast number of possibilites, but at one point, they will repeat. the fact that someone programs an algorithm means there's logic behind the function (see Pseudorandom number generator on wikipedia) so, it is possible to "predict and control" the outcome of the machines. you've seen the slots that say 98% payout, 99.9%, 99.9999% payout even the 101.2% payouts. the idea is that these payouts occour over a long period of time, so the casion has time to profit off the gambling money, i.e. earns 105% before paying out the 101.2% thus netting the casino 3.8% but you get the drift
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mike, 25 Jan 2007 @ 1:28pm

More info on progressives
More light on the situation here.

Not all progressives(those big jackpot meters on top of those video slot machines) are stand alone(independent from other jackpots). In fact, a lot of progressives are linked. Especially the WOF games.

These linked progressives are controlled by a host system...sometimes the host systems are not manufactured by the same company that made the machine. In that case, the machine didn't glitch, it may have been that host system...(or human error where it was manually triggered on accident.)

Still, in the long run, the coverage on this is pretty terrible. They aren't naming any names, just the casino involved.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
David, 25 Jan 2007 @ 3:57pm

mike is a dumbbutt
HAI GUYZ INTERNET ARGUMENT LOL!!!111
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
David D, 25 Jan 2007 @ 3:59pm

MIKE IS EVIL!!!
Mike stole that guys money. And is gay.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Marty, 25 Jan 2007 @ 4:02pm

Seriously
I know *for a fact* that manufacturers build in these "features" that report to the host system that something was won, but allow the casino's discretion in actually paying them by offering outs such as software "glitches."

Just messin'. You're all idiots.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
David, 25 Jan 2007 @ 4:03pm

HAI GUYZ
goatse?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
GNUBear, 26 Jan 2007 @ 3:28am

The Problem
The problem here is that people keep going to casinos and supporting a business model that is legally free to screw the players. Kind of reminds me of an American company in the Pacific NW....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Alex, 26 Jan 2007 @ 3:49am

Bad publicity, for whom?
Everybody keeps talking about bad publicity, but I couldn't find where it says which casino should get the bad publicity. Which casino is it?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
David D, 26 Jan 2007 @ 6:06am

LAME
Marty = dumb doesn't know the industry.

Mike = sucky still HAI MIKE!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
will, 26 Jan 2007 @ 7:39am

this same thing happened in Argentina 3 months ago
it was in a slot machine. the big jackpot was 35,600,000 but the casino said it was machine malfunction and only wanted to pay 35,600.
obviously no slot machine will give away such a big jackpot.. but... who's fault.. theirs or ours?

malfunctions only appears to pop up when is in the customer's favor.

you can read this, if you read spanish
http://www.clarin.com/diario/2006/10/17/sociedad/s-03101.htm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Patrick, 26 Jan 2007 @ 7:47am

Surely then...
Seems to me that if there have been false-wins due to software glitches there would also be false losses due to computer glitches.

Has the casino ever approached a customer and said, "here's your jackpot, the software incorrectly reported a losing pull, but it should have reported a win.

Frankly, I find it hard to believe that you could determine a falsely reported win was due to a software glitch in a short period of time and simultaneously be unaware of any problems with the software.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Michael, 26 Jan 2007 @ 7:52am

Casinos
Is it possible that a software glitch kept a rightful winner at another machine from winning? It a glitch can tell one player that they wrongfully won, it can just as easily tell a rightful winner that they wrongfully lost. There should be no faith in such a system. The casino, it's mistake, should pay up. Otherwise, players should find another casino owned by another group. The player should be paid. If I were on that jury, I'd award tripple damages for bad faith.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Matt, 26 Jan 2007 @ 8:14am

False Advertisement
I don't think it matters if it was software glitch. The guy played there because he thought it had a huge payout if he won the jackpot. Would you play at a slot machine knowing the jackpot was 2 meal tickets?!? False Advertisement IMO.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
yo, 26 Jan 2007 @ 8:22am

do they..
I bet the casino never reports glitches that make customers loose money...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
reality, 26 Jan 2007 @ 8:23am

RE: Real Scam
Of course the real scam is a casino period!
Casinos are just feeding off people who are bad a math.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dickard, 26 Jan 2007 @ 8:24am

Glitch
I'd like to challenge each and every one of my losses as a "glitch."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Prrk47002, 26 Jan 2007 @ 8:37am

The new reported.....
This particular casino has already taken in over $100 million. They're gonna let $102,000 ruin their reputation???
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
C, 26 Jan 2007 @ 8:48am

glitch?
So can he claim all the times he lost money it was a glitch? The computer had a glitch in it that was telling him he lost when he had really been winning all evening?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
bob, 26 Jan 2007 @ 8:50am

casino
here are more casinos that have ripped off users online and land based

http://www.searchjerk.com/cgi-bin/smartsearch/smartsearch.cgi?keywords=casino&search=Search
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Atash, 26 Jan 2007 @ 8:56am

Psychology of gambling
Average humans seem to have a poor sense of odds, accuracy, and danger. Humans are apt to judge the safeness or danger of a situation by what happens to other humans. Oddly enough, dozens of people skating on thin ice has the paradoxical effect of making it seem SAFER despite the fact that all that weight makes it more dangerous!

The behavior is easy to see in stock markets; in this case the investment banks and brokers are the croupiers.

Advertisers for the casinos assume that average people have poor judgement regarding their own personal prospects when they see advertisements showing smiling people around the gaming tables cheerfully losing their money. The actors and actresses simply model the correct behaviors and attitudes, and the average person doesn't rationally calculate their own personal probability of winning, or ask if ANYBODY is truly a net winner.

By the way, one of the most common and effective advertisements for gambling is the gambling scene in a movie. Hollywood-type movies are feature-length advertisements disguised as entertainment. So you have the suave, debonaire James Bond type character in a casino, maybe he wins, and then he gets the girl. Men who fancy themselves as being the "man about town" type will copy the behavior. They want to be Sean Connery. Modelling the behavior and making it look like the key to fulfilment of some kind is sufficient to get some people to actually engage in the target behavior. They influence their own friends, and it spreads.

The casinos have made it very clear that gambling is a form of "entertainment" and that they are under no legal obligation to make the games "fair". They now have numerous and poorly-disclosed "cheats" to foil card-counters, for example. If someone has an extremely good memory he will be escorted from the premises by casino goons.

A long time ago, the casino owners noticed that the gambling impulse is not rational. One of the ways that gamblers lose is that they tend to have a compulsion to win back what they lost the same way that they lost it. Hence as strange as it may seem, the casino owners are not terribly worried about baiting the players with enough wins to keep them happy. An occassional paid actor or actress gleefully jumping up and down over an ostensible win, that is completely bogus, and being hugged by their attractive ostensible companion, is sufficient. The casino owners like to maximize their haul.

These people hire behavioral psychologists to advise them on priming their suckers. They know what they are doing.

Oddly enougn, yet another trick is to sponsor "responsible vice" messages. The casino owners actually pay for advertising about "knowing your limits". The reason is that it subtly suggests that there is such a thing as responsible vice--that it's OK as long as you can (convince yourself that you can) "handle it". This works like a charm especially on a lot of self-righteous types who are prone to parroting the moralisms of people in positions of power. It also has the effect of hopefully keeping the host solvent; the parasite doesn't want to prematurely kill its host, but to maximize its haul over the useful lifetime of the host.

;-{)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Get It Right, 26 Jan 2007 @ 9:01am

It's Not A Casino
PA does not have casinos. PA has slots parlors at racetracks.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sean Wilkinson, 26 Jan 2007 @ 9:13am

This is my Father.
Yeah this is my father this happened to. What he one wasn't the actual slot machine. There was ths "player power jackpot" witch was a promo to get people in the casino. How it work was at random it picked a users casino card that was in the machine As the winner. What we think happened was he was really the winner. However some one type and extra zero or something and when they saw the figure on the screen they panicked. This is where they started to lie to him and tried to tell them there was another winner across the casino witch there wasn;t and they try to get him away from the machine to clear it to get rid of the evidence. So my dad not a unfair person if they admitted from the start this was a mistake in the jackpot amount and were willing to give him the actual jackpot he would of took it that night. but now with all the b/s that has gone on they just dug them selves a very very big hole.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Logical Thought, 26 Jan 2007 @ 9:36am

Whatever happened to business responsibility?
Excuse me, but I work in Information Technology, and I am calling BS on this casino. This is absolutely ridiculous. The business decides to use a certain system, the business is responsible for their own equipment functioning properly. If they have a software "glitch", then they should eat the cost, not the customer. Furthermore, If someone is testing in that kind of enviornment, you cannot tell me that they were testing on a network segment that was directly connected to a production system, if they did, the CASINO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS ACCIDENT. If I'm driving a car, and my electronic anti-lock brake system fails and I crash into someone else, would an insurance company accept my excuse like "SORRY!!! It was a software glitch!!! I'm not responsible!!!!"

I'm hereby suggesting that ALL casino patrons discontinue the use of ANY electronically controlled device that is labeled anything anywhere near indicating that the casino is not liable for "something" related to a electronic malfunction. I sure as hell know I won't use them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
East Side Dave, 26 Jan 2007 @ 9:50am

WTF
I live 15 minutes from the place and after seeing the "software glitch" bull$hit I will NEVER put any money in there casino! I was going to take a few friends there on Saturday but I think I will go to Atlantic City. FU Philadelphia Park casino!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ronald Fleming, 26 Jan 2007 @ 9:54am

Casino's blame computer glitch
When one harbours the addiction of gambling, one must realize that gambling is designed signifiicantly for losers, not winners. Payouts are recovered very quickly and in some remote cases, can be tax deductable.
Here in Canada gambling is now legal and widespread throughout the country, but you must think politically correct on whether its beneficial to the population, because this same government declared gambling illegal when run by the mob.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
moose, 26 Jan 2007 @ 10:20am

Gambling
Whats the point? Just go play cards or see a show at a gambling resort and leave the "video" machines alone
oh yeah visit the buffets
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
John Ketcham, 26 Jan 2007 @ 10:59am

Not the first time
I saw this story on the local news.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ronald Fleming, 26 Jan 2007 @ 11:44am

Re: Casino's are regulated
Good point Anon and your comment further supports the truth of corruption that of course is evident in any organized factor that deals with enormous revenue.
After all, did not organized crime initiated by the Mafia design the gambling scenario for profits and isn't it equally common knowledge that the mob was not eactly known for its fairness and honesty.
With governments now under the control of gambling revenues, would one assume that corruption would end?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dallas, 26 Jan 2007 @ 12:43pm

10%?
Pay the guy 10% of the winnings: $10,200. He would have went home clicking his heels.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
jaydoug, 26 Jan 2007 @ 1:23pm

So winning is a glitch? :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dave, 27 Jan 2007 @ 12:58am

my basement slot machine does the same thing...
i have a slot machine i got on ebay that i turn on every game night for the guys to play with. i let it "malfunction" every now and then and i can just keep the jackpots instead of giving them out. tehe.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ronald Fleming, 27 Jan 2007 @ 5:34am

Gambling addictions
I am grateful I do not have a gambling problem, but I have immediate friends and associates that have serious addictions to VLT machines and organized casinos in Edmonton and area.
I used to play the lotto drives where they used the bingo ball machines with letters on them live on TV to correspond with the draw dates. When they removed those live draws, the lottery industry went electronic and therefore ceased to be honest and fair. With these electronic numbers, just like VLT's and any computer motivated game, they can be programmed and reprogrammed to win or loose.
Because there are numerous winners who collect jackpots from these machines, the income overwelms any shortfall with payouts, believe it. Those machines are not programmed to win, but they are designed to create revenue and false hope.
Everytime I see security trucks hauling cash bags from casinos I just wonder how many families were torn apart, how many promising people were incarcerated because they turned to crime to support their addiction and most important, how many desperate souls are contemplating or have already ended their lives from out of control addictions to gambling.
Pretty pathetic when the government boasts about their enormous profits they generate from such vile crap.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
|333173|3|_||3, 29 Jan 2007 @ 7:26pm

Simple solution
set up your own casino
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ronald Fleming, 30 Jan 2007 @ 10:56am

The mob did it
Setting up your own casino, if handled and organized properly can gaurantee a rich reward both financially and relatively security.
But there are also many disadvantages to them and not necessarily the fault of an owner, after-all it takes patrons in order for any service related business to survive, but to manage a casino, one must be able to control their conscience and feelings of compulsive gamblers.
You could not be a sincere person towards one that has gambled their life and family away, just as a person who deliberately does themselves harm or gets involved with criminal intentions.

There are ads on TV that are stressing the idea of gambling responsibly. Just like an alcoholic, or a drug addict, how can responsibilty ever play a part in a deliberate notion? An alcoholic, a smoker, a drug addict as well as a complusive gambler knows the risk everytime they endure their complusion.
And unfortunately the mob knew it, the government now knows it and gambling casino owners also know complusive everything goes beyond the norm, or the responsibilty level.
Isn't that what profits are all about?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Patrick, 27 Sep 2007 @ 1:14am

There is no such thing as software glitch from testing.

Every code that is written, is compiled and signed digitally by the programmer.

It is then sent to another randomly selected programmer, in another city which will look at the source code, make sure nothing wrong with it and again compiled and signed it digitally.

It goes through a third randomly selected programmer who will do exactly the same thing.

Each line of codes is checked and tested by 3 different programmers. Not one programmer will write the whole codes.

If there is such a glitch they would have to recall the machines (not one machine only).

The casino is just trying to cheat the guy by trying to intimidate him.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Gregory, 11 May 2009 @ 6:29pm

Safe Play
Or maybe they intentionally do those things to collect or money out of unsafe play. i don't usually go into land based casino games. The fact that you may lose all your money in just a play. casino on line games had beaten up the land base perhaps.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 23 Jul 2009 @ 7:32pm

Check out the ones in new mwxico happens all the time but with millions
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 24 Jun 2010 @ 11:29pm

I don't understand how it isn't considered theft when casinos have machines with $10 spins, yet one can put in $2400 and get one bonus round, finally, with a low payout and few others throughout the games and very few credits. Penny machines can take a thousand dollars and a bonus round may never show up. I watched a person put in $1200 and get nothing - and another put $2400 in a 5 cent machine with a 240 credit payout after all that time. The speed of the machines, the number of rows and high cost for maximum bets are bad, but I think the casinos have changed all so that few bonus rounds come up so people keep playing. I lost so much on the jumping out Inca, Wizard, and other Inca type machines that I am going to ban myself from the casinos. Why do machines pay out all at one time and then not at all? How can so few win and why when thousands are being put in are most payments $160 to $300? I don't believe it is random. I think it is fixed re. times and payouts, when they will be, and that the bonus rounds have been turned down so people keep trying to get one to get some money back. How can expensive machines pay so rarely? I can't believe I ever went, but I have definitely learned that addiction can affect anyone - and that the casinos don't pay high enough payouts often enough for what is being put in. Who really watches what is happening or what is happening to so many?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mike, 18 Feb 2011 @ 1:12pm

Casino's not paying off due to technical glitch
This exact thing has happened to me twice at French Lick Casino in Indiana. The first time the machine malfunctioned, I was told they couldn't pay off because I didn't tell anyone immediately and kept playing till someone came. The last time, I stopped playing and had four witnesses that the fishing game should have paid off %$580 because I was max. betting. It had to be on film. Well, the pit boss said he couldn't pay off and just walked away. I asked him again about it and checking the tape and he said I probably hit the button wrong (like I'm some idiot)and said the witnesses (which I didn't even know) didn't matter. He lost several customers for life, but there should be some regulation. People can't afford to take their own losses and then when they finally should have won allow the casino to cheat them out of that too. Those are no odds. I tell everyone, because it was so unfair, and it has happened to several other people at the same game. Why doesn't someone check into this?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
www.homebet88.com, 16 Nov 2014 @ 11:40am

if it some reputable casino like www.homebet88.com don't think they will cheat around. They got pride in their company
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
bryan phillips (profile), 21 Nov 2019 @ 3:08am

Discover the Great Betting Experience at the Brand New Casino
you can find out the different range of brand new casino and choose the best one.
For more information: https://www.reddit.com/user/william4martin/comments/dzhked/discover_the_great_betting_experience_at_ the/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ronniephillips (profile), 22 Nov 2019 @ 11:36pm

New Casino-a real platform to enjoy gambling
New casino in the industry, it is very challenging for punters which to choose are not? Well, if you are going through our blog.

For more information: https://palynewcasinogamblinggamesinuk.blogspot.com/2019/11/new-casino-real-platform-to-enjoy.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Forietincee (profile), 6 Feb 2021 @ 4:43am

Vous n'avez plus besoin de réfléchir à la façon de gagner de l'argent, car pour cela, je vous recommanderai un site https://casinoenligne365.com/neteller-casino/ avec les meilleures plateformes de casino en ligne. Il est très facile de faire du profit et de la bonne humeur ici.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]