European Commission To Fly In Emergency SMS Messages By Helicopter
from the didn't-they-try-something-like-this-in-Independence-Day? dept
We've noted in the past that mobile operators continue to have problems delivering text messages at times, calling into question the wisdom of using SMS to deliver emergency messages. A new European Commission project hopes to get around the problem of natural disasters or other events disrupting SMS delivery by sending text messages via helicopter. Basically, it sounds like they're strapping a cellular base station and some other network equipment to a chopper, so they can disseminate alerts and emergency information to people in a given area. It's an interesting project, and one that could be potentially useful, since a lack of communications infrastructure is often one of the biggest obstacles to overcome in a disaster zone. However, this seems like it's more focused on one-way, top-down communications, rather than providing a replacement infrastructure allowing two-way communication. It's a good start, though, and hints at possible future solutions. Perhaps there is a future for stratellites after all...Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
balloon
[ link to this | view in thread ]
balloon
[ link to this | view in thread ]
----------------------------------------------
"Progress is the exchange of one set of nuisances for another."
Murphy
---------------------------------------
[ link to this | view in thread ]
peer to peer
http://davidbrin.blogspot.com/2007/01/designed-to-let-us-down-our.html
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I don't get it.
And for communication between emergency workers, a helicopter-mounted FM repeater might be more use.
"The more sophisticated the infrastructure, the more fragile it is." -- too true, and when the shit really hits the fan they usually end up relying on Amateur Radio Operators with very simple and very reliable SSB or FM radio equipment.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: I don't get it.
Radio is definitly the way to go for both respects
[ link to this | view in thread ]
the military does it already
the best example is the quickfix:
http://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/systems/quickfix.htm
which is basically a sophisticated intelligence platform in a helicopter. they use them to intercept and jam enemy communications.
choppers make good short term/short range communications platforms. they are easier to put up than a fixed antenna, easier to move, and you can expand coverage by adding more choppers.
the downside is that choppers are expensive to keep in the air long term. they require crews and tons of fuel compared to ground based communicaitons equipment.
a more ecconomical solution would be an unmanned aerial vehicle like the airforce's predator:
http://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/predator
presumably a cellular signal booster is lighter and uses less energy than the quickfix gear, so you could keep the UAVs in the air longer and they would cost less to operate.
either way, using aircraft as makeshift antennas is no substitute for mobile, gound based infrasturcture. trucks and generators are cheaper to build and operate and can run for much longer.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: the military does it already
Choppers are so much sexier than trucks - they have whirly blades and the pilots say things like 'roger' and everything
[ link to this | view in thread ]