A Tough Week For The Satellite Industry

from the on-the-launchpad dept

Tue, Feb 6th 2007 8:58am — Joseph Weisenthal

In previous posts questioning the business model behind the satellite radio companies, we've pointed out that just the process of sending satellites into space and maintaining them is no simple matter. It's quite costly and complicated, and adds a lot of risk to any company whose business is based around satellite communications. The past several days has seen further confirmation of this point. Last week, a commercial satellite launch resulted in a major explosion. The resulting damage to its launchpad could hamper plans at DirecTV to launch more satellites later this year. Adding to the industry's woes, satellite communications company Globalstar has announced that it's encountering major technical problems with many of its satellites currently in the sky. Not only is it not sure what's causing the problems, but it's not sure whether it'll be able to fix them. So far, it's only found temporary workarounds, and it warned, in a filing to the SEC that "...if the Company is unsuccessful in developing additional technical solutions, the quality of two-way communications services will decline, and by some time in 2008 substantially all of the Company's currently in-orbit satellites will cease to be able to support two-way communications services." The company may in fact find a fix before then, but in light of all these costs and technical problems, it's easy to understand why the history of satellite based businesses has been littered with so many failures.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

8 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Enrico Suarve, 6 Feb 2007 @ 9:33am

A possible alternative?
I take it everyone still thinks 'Stratellies' are still a dumb idea?

http://techdirt.com/articles/20061214/120127.shtml

How nice would it be to be able to pull on a piece of string/let out a little air and actually touch the technology about now?

OK they might not be able to circumnavigate messages as easily but I bet in the long run they'd be cheaper...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Howard Lee Harkness, 6 Feb 2007 @ 12:08pm
  
  Re: A possible alternative? [Stratellies]
  I like the "stratellite" idea.
  Routing traffic shouldn't be a problem. That sort of problem has already been nicely solved in a variety of ways.
  A balloon should also have substantially more payload than a satellite, and I'll bet the $3.0e7 launch price includes lots of non-recurring costs, and long-term maintenance should be easier. A lot of the technology is rapidly getting better, lighter, and cheaper (like the new high-efficiency CIGS solar cells, which can be made very thin).
  A combination of ground-based nodes in remote areas (e.g., mountaintops in the western, sparsely-populated states) and balloons over major metro areas (and open ocean, for relay) could expand coverage while keeping costs down and maintenance access easier. At 65000 ft altitude, a unit over Dallas should be line-of-sight from a unit over Dallas -- etc. Four or five balloons and a half-dozen ground stations could adequately cover Texas and the adjoining states.
  Lots of promise there.
  --
  The Celtic Fiddler, Violins and Accessories
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Howard Lee Harkness, 6 Feb 2007 @ 12:11pm
    
    Re: Re: A possible alternative? [Stratellies]
    Typo: Meant to say "Houston" for one occurrence of "Dallas" above.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
MT, 6 Feb 2007 @ 10:13am

I think they will find that the sun us going apeshit right now, and it's only going to get worse. Our solar minimum has been acting like a nutty solar maximum for a while now from what I have read. If this is true, we will probably have a lot more satellite problems in the coming years.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Buzz, 6 Feb 2007 @ 11:44am

Niche Job Market?
Time to find some unemployeed astronaugts (that aren't in jail) and give them the service manuals for these satellites. ;-)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Conspiracy Theorist, 6 Feb 2007 @ 1:01pm

????
Has anyone consulted the Chinese government? Hmmmm....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 6 Feb 2007 @ 1:53pm

Conspiracy Theorist makes a good point- isn't the fact that the Chinese military is using satellites for target practice a bit of a downer as well?

In any case, redundancy is needed, in addition to defense from the sun.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
|333173|3|_||3, 6 Feb 2007 @ 5:44pm

Only one!
The Chinese only shot one sattelite. Maybe NASA should rig hubble to crash into a major chinese satteliet (although with the reliability of bits of Hubble, it might well hit a crucial US one)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]