Washington Post Latest To Join Open WiFi Fear Mongering Crusade
from the give-it-a-rest dept
By now we'd thought that fear mongering about open WiFi networks was limited to local news reporters -- but apparently not. The Washington Post chimes in with its own silly scare piece about how criminals might use open WiFi networks to do illegal things. It's a story that's been reported to death already -- and has been debunked an equal number of times. The article contains plenty of quotes from law enforcement, but not a single quote from a WiFi or technology expert. It also makes the completely incorrect assertion that: "Open wireless signals are akin to leaving your front door wide open all day -- and returning home to find that someone has stolen your belongings and left a mess that needs cleaning." That's simply not true. Nothing gets "stolen," and it's unlikely they leave any kind of mess. If you set up your network correctly, your own use can be perfectly protected while others use your broadband. Basically, it sounds like this article was pushed by law enforcement officials who don't like the fact that open WiFi makes it a bit harder for them to track down criminals. The thing is, though, there are always going to be ways to be anonymous online -- and, more importantly, just like everyday criminals, those using open WiFi often leave plenty of other clues that allow them to be caught. It's just that sometimes it takes a bit more detective work. There's nothing in the law that says that criminals should be required to make it easy for police to track them down -- and yet this reporter seems to think that all of the benefits of open WiFi should be taken away just because the system might be misused by a few.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
guns, knives, all weapons
payphones and calling cards
paper and pen
computers
bank accounts
UPS, FedEx, USPS
shipping containers
IRC
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Open WiFi = No Firewall
Just so you understand what "correctly" is in your sentence...
Your garden-variety, consumer-grade wireless router assumes that the wireless is for internal use. Hence, to the extent the router is providing any sort of firewall (NAT or better), that's on the broadband connection "side" of the router...not the WiFi side. The WiFi and any wired network jacks on the router are considered part of the "internal" network and do not have a firewall between them. Hence, open WiFi gives WiFi users unfettered access to your internal network, with no firewall protection.
"Correctly", therefore, implies that there is firewall protection between the WiFi side of the router and the internal network. For example, IPCop, an open source firewall, offers up a "blue" zone for WiFi separate from the "green" zone for wired users, and you can set up rules to state what can and can't pass from blue to green or vice versa.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Open WiFi = No Firewall
Beside, with Norton Firewall, McAfee Firewall, etc., most people with virus protection also have firewall protection. I'm not saying these are good ones, but for the average home user I would assume it's adequate.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Open WiFi
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Open WiFi
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Open WiFi
Your (security company) story makes no friggin' sense. How did they buy computers from Dell? Wampum?
Non
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Open WiFi
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Open WiFi
Either: a) You're an astroturfer spreading more FUD about open Wi-Fi or
b) You and your "security company" are incompetent morons.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Don't hackers read this blog?
Never presume you are safe on any network you don't own. Use https and ssh for any data you don't want others to see. Assume any unencrypted data is being viewed by someone with evil intent.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Don't hackers read this blog?
There are two sides to the issue.... the user abuse of open wifi networks and the provider of an open wifi network abusing the users... substitute "abuse" with your favorite form of mischief
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why make it any easier for the evil-doers?
For the life of me, I can't see why it's considered "fear mongering" to warn people of these possibilities and inform them of just how easy it is to lock the connection down. Sure, a determined evil-doer with the right knowledge can break into it regardless, but it still makes sense to at least put up a speed-bump.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wifi in Public?
The government can't force you to lock down your Wifi connection at home, just like they can't force you to lock your door or get a home security system. If you don't do it though, that is your own stupidity.
Should businesses be granted the same luxury though? I'm not so sure about that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yeah, it's scare mongering, but...
The liabilities of operating an open access point far outweigh the benefits, at least for the private citizen.
They quickly decided that the Elderly Woman was innocent, but what if it wasn't so obvious? Anonymity isn't the problem so much as creating a path so that the actions of others can be traced back to YOU.
Maybe this metaphor is as bad as the Post's-- operating an open access point is like giving strangers the use of your phone and mail box.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Law Enforcement is right on this one
Bad guy parks his car in front of your house/business and starts browsing for child porn using your unsecured wifi connection. Law enforcement tracks this back to your IP address, obtains warrant to ISP for the IP info associated with your IP address and "politely" removes all of your computer equipment for investigative purposes. Eventually they realize that you are not the culprit and a month or so later they will return your gear to you.
Secure your wifi connections people, this kind of thing absolutely happens.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Law Enforcement is right on this one
FORCE people to secure their internet access for crying out loud. Why do we even give home users the option not to?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Law Enforcement is right on this one
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Law Enforcement is right on this one
My friends and I think that coffee shops and such should print the key to their WiFi on their receipts. Then change the code every day. That way people have to (at least theoretically) buy something to gain access to their network. We came to this conclusion due to leaches not evil do-ers. We knew a guy who was too cheap to pay for internet access. He took his laptop and would sit in the parking lot of local hotels and coffee shoppes and use theirs.
Which I know some hotels have gotten wise to these leaches and now make you prove you are a guest to use their internet.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
As we speak, criminals are using pens and papers to plot their evil doing. They are roaming your neighborhood using public roads! They may even use the phone system to communicate with each other!
When will it end? Where do we draw the line! Please write to your congressmen and ask them to ban WiFi for criminals!
Please somebody think of the Children!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]