Can Google Still Claim It's Not Competing With Microsoft?
from the game-on dept
As Google has built up its online productivity products, it's had a harder and harder time maintaining its stance that it's not competing directly with Microsoft. Now the company is dropping any pretense that it's not competing head on, as it is releasing a paid version of its online office products, which includes email, a calendar, spreadsheets and a word processor. This is a departure from the company's traditional strategy of monetizing all of its services through advertising, and it hopes that at $50 per user per year, it presents a much more compelling value than Microsoft Office. Already, some big companies are using Google apps, including GE and Procter & Gamble, which one can assume are big spenders on Microsoft products. Of course, Google's entry into paid software isn't likely to be a cakewalk. When companies are actually paying for software, there's an assumption of excellent reliability. Error messages like "Oops, we're sorry, try again in a few minutes" probably won't go over very well. Furthermore, business will expect some level of software support, something that Google doesn't have much experience with. And of course there are technical challenges as well, such as how users are supposed to stay productive when they're offline. Still, there's no getting around the fact that this is a direct shot at one of Microsoft's biggest cash cows. While it probably won't steal a lot of business right away, it's likely to chip away on Microsoft's margins over time.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Why Pay
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Why Pay
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
microsoft is trying to compete with google.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Let MS sweat it out, let them feel some pressure to improve out of necessity and not convenience.
"Swing away"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
You would've realized that had you read the article instead of going of on a tangent about something completely unrelated, and quite frankly, uninteresting.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: calendar and contacts syncing on wireless devi
I'll write something up about this on my blog as soon as I give my clients a head start. ;)
aloha,
-Brent
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
You might have to "Transfer" your domain back to google"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Must be one of those slickdealer thieves!
lol
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
http://www.google.com/enterprise/gsa/
http://www.google.com/enterprise/mini/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Google actually does have "search hardware".
I thing the poster knows this. He said:
When they start delivering their software on hardware to integrate on your companies infrastructure.. much like the search index..
I take this as - when they offer a "Google Applications Appliance" much like they currently offer a "Search Appliance". How are you reading it differently?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Now, if Google would license these apps on a subscription basis for installation on your company's servers, and came up with a good support contract system for their users, that would be a different story. Google already makes a search appliance available for internal networks, so I don't think it would be too difficult to replicate that for their web-based office apps. Being able to get a dedicated box running Google apps for your private network might just be something people will jump on, especially smaller businesses who choke on the price of MS Office upgrades. If nothing else, this may serve as incentive for Microsoft to make their prices more reasonable.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Price comparison
Google Office - $50 per year
Considering the Google offering is much slimmer on features than even $399 Standard version of MS Office (not to mention the volume discounts most large companies get from MS) I don't see a lot of value in Google's product. If you're willing to put up with a less featured office suite, better to go with OpenOffice.org which is free and has none of the uptime problems and security issues of opening potentially sensitive documents on a web-based application.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Security issues
With more and more information getting covered by privacy laws, I think it would be a small market left over.
--
The Celtic Fiddler, violins and musical accessories
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm all for alternatives to MSFT....
If you really want a $50 alternative to MSFT, get SuSE Linux (or one of the other well supported desktop distros), which comes with Open Office and Evolution. Not only will your operating system be free, but you'll get a ton of good, supported productivity tools and you will in control of your data.
Sure, OpenOffice is not fully compatible with MS Office yet, but it's much better than the poor 2nd cousin clone from Google. Really, Google should just stick to what they are, an advertising company.
Chris.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not Corporate Data Ready
There was an article (last year?) about some a big financial firm with a sophisticated IT infrastructure being fined many million dollars, and potentially losing a $1B lawsuit because it could not produce the data requested within the time given by the court. This is not so much about the systems being up, as much as it is about being able to find all the data requested and to be able to prove that (1) it is all the data requested and (2) that it was not altered. Now add in trends around increasing privacy concerns...
I think Google would need a different, specialized infrastructure and right now they have a branding problem in terms of how they handle data relative to typical corporate concerns.
It would be fascinating to see this take off though, and I put nothing past Google.
EP
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
...Just curious
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Thats one hour downtime every 6 weeks. That would be superb for Exchange, too bad not many Exchange servers can do that unless there is very little load.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Whew
I signed up 4 domains to use Google Apps. I loved it.
I extolled the virtues of it to everyone I know.
I had a buddy who thought MS Live office was better but I pointed out that Google was free (and did more).
Well, later he enjoyed pointing out that Google would start charging. I was a bit worried.
Part of what I was doing was consolidating domains. I had one e-mail address from one domain forward to another.
So for me, I thought that I would pay the per user per domain - ouch. Or give up some functionality.
Today I visited Google Apps -
www.google.com/a
Sure enough they were charging (and rightly so). But they let the family and organizations still use it for free - woohoo.
http://www.google.com/a/help/intl/en/admins/editions.html
They also let people have some great apps for free. That is incredible. I used writely with a friend one night to collaborate on a document. It was amazing. Yeah, writely is feature sparse compared to Word but who uses all of the features.
I don't.
Most small businesses can use the free version to meet their needs. SMB of 25 or more will probably want something more but a small company of 5 people or so could use the free version.
For example, I have a friend who runs a heating/cooling business. The company employs 10 - 20 people but the techs are on the road most of the time. Only a handful of people need e-mail - the free version would work fine for them.
Google Apps is a great product. I am thankful that the let some of the early adopters stay on for free.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Whew
Your friend who runs the heating/cooling business probably uses Quickbooks. For him, the online version of Quickbooks would allow for time-tracking and a bunch of other stuff, all things that Google doesn't provide.
Free email and calendaring is one things, but replacing business apps with Google is a false hope, never mind the cost of re-training people to use yet another system. Even Google's email service is questionable, I've had two business owners approach me about Open Source alternatives, one because spam filtering sucked, the other because he couldn't search by date and was loosing sales leads because of that.
Like I said in another context, there are a lot of factors that keep people from moving away from MSFT, not the least of which is the cost of re-training people. And there are several critical apps which most business won't move away from without a 100% compatible replacement, namely:
1. Outlook
2. Excel
3. Quickbooks
Chris.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Go Google!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]