Government Accountability Office Trashes E-Voting Machine Testing
from the yet-again dept
The latest evidence of problems with the electronic voting actually comes from the government itself. John points us to the news of a report coming out of the Government Accountability Office (GAO) slamming the process of e-voting testing. In January, the story broke that the company that had supposedly certified approximately 70% of the e-voting machines used in last November's election had actually lost its own certification back during the summer due to some serious questions about whether or not it was really thoroughly testing the e-voting machines (if it was testing them at all). When this was pointed out, people who supported reform on e-voting machines were called wild-eyed activists even as they were being proven correct. Some industry insiders then stopped by Techdirt to claim we had no idea what was really going on and insisting (a) that the machines had been tested and (b) letting security researchers look at the machines would be somehow irresponsible. Yet, the GAO seems to find the opposite -- noting just how problematic these machines have been: "We concluded in 2005 that these concerns have caused problems with recent elections, resulting in the loss and miscount of votes." It's all pretty damning again, but we fully expect the e-voting companies (at least the ones who aren't looking to sell their e-voting units, as both Sequoia and Diebold have explored) to continue to deny there are any problems.On a related note, can we give a public hand to the GAO, which seems to be the one government agency that doesn't seem to toe the party line all the time? From telling Senators that blaming file sharing system for porn is bogus to slapping down the FCC over its bogus broadband competition numbers to noting that pharmaceutical patents prevent the development of new drugs to this latest report, it seems like the GAO actually is one government organization that's more focused on what's actually happening, rather than what the lobbyists and politicians want to happen.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
At least for now, until the lobbyists figure out who to pay off.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Don't Forget the USPS
2012 is coming and the Hopi Indians were right.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
3 cheers for GAO
It is nice to think there is a sliver of hope where greed does not rule our government.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why GAO is actually independent
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Old way: Hand-count thousands of votes.
The New Way: Press a button.
Apparently their convenience is more important than the security and accountability of the election process.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: From someone using electronics to make his poi
Hypocrite
Never An Anonymous Coward
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Walking the talk
I am not opposed to e-voting because I have a problem with "electronics", I am opposed to it because it because in many cases it is inherently insecure.
Voting NEEDS a paper trail, so that...
1) Recounts can be meaningful.
2) People can see that their votes were count as cast.
Without that, we're reduced to "The computer says so, so it must be right". Electronics has its place, as does hard copy. Would you buy in a store that had no price tags on the shelf?
To answer your question; Techdirt isn't broken. e-voting is.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Where?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
er, stupid
[ link to this | view in chronology ]