Friendster Continues To Build Friendlier Relations With The Patent Office
from the wonderful dept
What were we recently saying about companies that fail in the marketplace suddenly focusing on patent infringement as a new strategy? It certainly looks like Friendster may be heading down that path. Back in July, the company was granted an extremely broad patent on social networking followed up by a second broad patent in October. The company is excited to announce that it's now received its third broad patent, this time for a "System and method for managing connections in an online social network." It's not at all clear why such a broad concept deserves such a patent.It's hard to see what good a patent does in a situation like this. The patent system is supposed to create incentives to create new products -- but it seems quite likely that Friendster would have been created even without the patent protection. In fact, Friendster creator Jonathan Abrams has said as much. He built Friendster not because of the patents, but to help him meet women. A second rationale given for the patent system is that it helps disclose these inventions -- but there's nothing in the patent that's so new and revolutionary it needs to be disclosed through the patent system. All of it is self-evident from the way the software works. Finally, the reason that Friendster was eclipsed by companies like MySpace and Facebook wasn't because they "stole" Friendster's idea, but because they did it better. That's the nature of competition. Friendster got so focused on trying to please its VCs that it stopped being useful to its users -- so they moved on. That's how competition is supposed to work. If you don't server your users, they'll find somewhere else to go. That's a good thing, because it helps continue to drive innovation. So, the patent served none of the purposes it was supposed to -- but now may be used by the company that failed in the marketplace to go after those who actually were successful and actually did a better job delivering what the customer wanted.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I can't wait to see the lawsuits.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I can't wait to see the lawsuits.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: I can't wait to see the lawsuits.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I can see it now...
1. Maybe if Tom had Friendster in his Top 8 he wouldn't be getting sued.
2. Suing isn't the best way to get added to Tom's Friends list.
3. How to succed in the social networking business without really trying.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I can see it now...
So when MySpace and Facebook get sued what will Techdirt use as the title?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]