FCC To Delay Flight Of Cell Phones
from the grounded dept
For a few years now, there's been a growing push to allow the use of mobile phones on airplanes. Both the FAA and FCC have been looking into the matter, with the FAA worried about interference with flight instruments, and the FCC concerned at how phones would interfere with ground networks. There's been a lot of research into both of these aspects, some of it less than convincing. But now, FCC Chairman Kevin Martin is apparently going to recommend the commission drop its tentative plan to move forward and allow in-flight phone use, after tests have shown that even with the use of on-board picocells (tiny base stations), phones on planes can still interfere with cellular networks on the ground. The head of AirCell, the company that would provide the in-flight service and relay the calls to the ground, says that the interference issues can be worked out, but this is a line the industry has been touting for a while. Still, he notes that a bigger obstacle for the company to overcome is social a one, since many people have no interest in sitting next to somebody chattering away on their phone during a flight. The CEO says that the company will now focus instead on delivering in-flight Internet access, an idea that many people are interested in, but hasn't yet worked in the market.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
And how long after they launch in-flight internet will people be bitching about other passengers viewing "inappropriate" web sites in-flight?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
In=flight internet + VOIP = In-flight cell phones irrelevant.
And how long after they launch in-flight internet will people be bitching about other passengers viewing "inappropriate" web sites in-flight?
------------------------------------------------------
Nobody is going to view porn when sitting next to a complete stranger when they're stuck there for an extended period of time. Only a moron like you would think of such a thing because you'd probably do it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Nobody is going to view porn when sitting next to a complete stranger when they're stuck there for an extended period of time. Only a moron like you would think of such a thing because you'd probably do it.
1.There a lot of people that are into the idea of knowing other people are watching them.
2.What better way to scare someone into being quite than by playing torrent of a mature, interracial, three-way with a facial finish?
3.Who says that all "inappropriate sites" are porn? Yes porn in public is considered inapporopriate by most people but just like all those legislative pushes to legally ban inappropriate games who decides the standard of inappropriate? With the way people are these days a watching the person in the next seat look at a site that promotes a religion different from their own would called "inappropriate".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Hell of Cell Phones
> for the company to overcome are
> social issues, since many people have
> no interest in sitting next to somebody
> chattering away on their phone
> during a flight.
Absolutely. People drive me nuts with these things. I already can't enjoy a meal at a restaurant or go to a movie without having to listen to one inane phone conversation after another. (And even when people aren't talking on them, they're still annoying in places like dark movies theaters, when they open them up to read their text messages and the screen light shines like a beacon throughout the theater.)
Planes are the one place where we are blessedly free from this ridiculous addiction to talking on the phone and I hope to god it stays that way. From the lack of legroom to the obligatory kid kicking your seat and baby squalling for hours, there's already more than enough to annoy you on a plane. Please, dear lord, don't add a teenager and her cell phone to the mix.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I agree to a point
On the other hand, I have no problems with people text messaging if they have their ringer turned off (and they are not in a theater as you mentioned). In a theater it's annoying, but on a flight, I don't see why people can't check their email and text quietly. There have been times I would have really liked to be able to whip out my phone and let people know I was going to land earlier or later then scheduled, or to get something specific ready for when I got there. I could have done this by email or instant message and never bothered anyone with it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The Hell of Cell Phones
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
9/11
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 9/11
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Money
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Money
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
There are vast swaths of the American west that have no cell coverage. Look at a coverage map of Nevada, Utah, Nebraska or Wyoming. Besides the cities and the highways there's not much coverage. Airliners don't follow US80.
Until the avionics manufacturers certify that each individual model of cellular handset does not interfere with their avionics then the airlines insurance companies are going to be loathed to cover the airlines. If there's no insurance coverage, there will be no cell phones allowed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cell phone usage
I don't like your talking to the person in the seat next to you. I don't like the constant tap tap tap on the keyboard of your laptop, or the brightness of your display. I don't like your annoying laugh while you are watching the in flight movie. I don't like the way you wiggle in your seat jostling me while you play your video game. I don't like your squalling brat who thinks kicking my seat is fun. I don't like your farting.
At least we agree on something, it IS all about YOU. YOU are just as annoying as all the other annoying people.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Cell phone usage
In fact theres lots of annoying things everywhere, and cellphones arent one of them. I laugh at people who rage at cell phone usage in restaurants. Do they rage at conversations? Rowdy parties? Whats the difference? A cell phone is half the noise as a two party conversation.
The real problem is your brain recognizes that a person talking to himself is a crazy man--a dangerous threat--and you are constantly alarmed by it. Except some of us have a flexible enough brain to inure ourselves to it. Maybe you should try that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Cell phone usage
Much agreed --- chill out folks - put on some headphones and move on with your day.
It's only a matter of time before cell phones are allowed, so get ready for it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Cell phone usage
> everywhere, and cellphones arent
> one of them.
Yes, they are.
> I laugh at people who rage at cell
> phone usage in restaurants. Do they
> rage at conversations?
I laugh at people who use hyperbolic terms like "rage" to distort other people's comments.
I'm not "raging" at anything, merely commenting on a social phenomenon.
As for your question about restaurant conversations, all one has to do is compare and contrast two people having a conversation in a restaurant with a person talking on a cell phone and the difference is striking to anyone with even rudimentary observational skills.
People talking face to face tend to have low-key conversations and intend them only to be heard between themselves. A cell phone user gets progressively louder and louder depending on the signal strength of his connection. As the connection fades in and out so does the talker's volume level. It's an empirically measureable phenomenon and is not in any way comparable to two people having a quiet conversation over a meal.
People are addicted to these things like heroin. A movie theater in California recently tried using jamming technology inside their business because no matter how many times they tell people to turn the damn things off, no one ever does and a significant percentage of people insist on using them during the movie. [And yes, I would object to (or "rage", to use your ridiculous term) people talking among themselves in a movie just as much as I would object to people talking on their phones.]
Based on the reaction of the people when they found out their phones were jammed, you'd have thought the theater had attempted to amputate their right arms or sell their children at auction. The mere thought of being phoneless for 90 minutes sent them into cold sweats and made them furious.
It's both ridiculous and sad at the same time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Cell phone usage
> in the seat next to you.
Other than the occasional "excuse me", I don't talk to people sitting next to me. They're strangers and I have nothing to say to them.
> I don't like the constant tap tap tap
> on the keyboard of your laptop or the
> brightness of your display.
I have never used my laptop while on a plane.
> I don't like your annoying laugh while
> you are watching the in flight movie.
I have never watched the in-flight movie. If it's a movie I'm interested in, I'd rather watch it at home on my plasma screen and surround sound, not on a tiny, grainy LCD half-blocked by someone else's head. And if it's not a movie I'm interested in, why would I watch it anywhere, let alone on a plane? A book is my entertainment of choice and I don't read comedies so you needn't worry about me laughing while I read.
> I don't like the way you wiggle in your
> seat jostling me while you play your
> video game.
I haven't played a video game since I was in high school, long before cell phones were invented and they were too big to carry on planes.
> I don't like your squalling brat who
> thinks kicking my seat is fun.
I don't have kids.
> I don't like your farting.
I only do that in the bathroom and you're unlikely to be in there with me to experience it.
So now that I've addressed all your issues with me, turn your damn phone off and be quiet, why dontcha?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The nerve...
WTF?
Are they completely OBLIVIOUS to the fact that I AM RIGHT HERE?!?!?!?! I don't want to hear them talking, and if I ever DO want to hear someone speak I WILL TELL THEM TO.
And so help me me, if they talk before I tell them to, THERE WILL BE HELL TO PAY!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The nerve...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cell phone usage
Our society is breeding a lack of consideration for others. If people today aren't willing to inconvenience themselves for the consideration of others, then we need guidelines in place to help them act considerately. The majority of people can't "inure" themselves to loudmouths. Besides, why should I have to work to ignore inconsiderates when I'm boxed in and can't change seats or move to a different booth? Why can't we just banish the one inconsiderate slob, rather than making 300 other people learn how to "inure" themselves?
People don't realize how loud they are when they're on a phonecall (and teenagers could care even less). Compound that with being in a close, cramped airplane and the situation becomes an annoyance to everyone around them.
Business travelers in particular. Guess what, business will wait! Besides, most business travelers who are really that concerned with their business try to fly "after hours". If they're flying during business hours, then the day's business issues aren't that important to them, so they ought to be able to stay off the phone as well.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Cell phone usage
Here's all the reason I need:
There's no reason why I shouldn't be able to.
...and if thats not enough for you...
I want to.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Cell phone usage
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Cell phone usage
> There's no reason why I shouldn't be able to.
> ...and if thats not enough for you...
> I want to.
Well, too bad. Airlines are private companies and you have no inalienable right to do whatever you want. The airlines are going to do what the majority of their customers want and so far, poll after poll shows that people are overwhelmingly in favor of keeping the ban in place for the very reason that they don't want to have to listen to the "I want to's" of the world yak away about nothing for three hours, all the while shouting into their phone whenever the plane moves away from a cell tower and their reception fades.
If you want to fly, you abide by the rules. If talking on your phone the entire way is so important to you, take a train or charter your own private flight.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Cell phone usage
Cell phone users can be loud. Or they can be quiet. Do we let them on planes? Whats the difference?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Cell phone usage
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Cell phone usage
Non-medical emergencies don't count?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rudeness
I agree. So why are you so inconsiderate? What possible reason, except a selfish inconsiderate one, could you have for wanting to deny me the right to hold a conversation? Why should your right to talk to the person in the seat across the aisle be respected, even when it keeps me awake as I try to doze, but my right to hold a conversation be abridged merely because the person isn't you?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What gets me...
Hell, if all you cell-phone yappers want everyone else to be quiet because you can't talk to your friend on the phone in the plane, push for silence-only flights. I'd be all for it. There's too much chatter in the world as it is.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cells on a Plane
If they talk to loud, laugh to hard, etc. buy a pair of noise cancelling headphones.
If their screen is too bright, they're looking at questionable content (in your opinion), close your eyes or buy some dark sunglasses.
Just because it annoys you doesn't mean it annoys the other 100 people. I'm not saying these things don't annoy me, or that I am all for being able to use my cell phone on a plane. What I am saying is look around at where you live. You have a choice here. You might not like it or afford it, but the choice is there. Don't condem people because of your beliefs. If you want that kind of control, move to China.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I think everyone on a plane should be required to take a sedative that is designed to lasts the duration of the flight. That would save everyone from any annoyance caused by other passengers (excepted being date raped by a gay male flight attendant).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What's wrong with a little bit of peace and quiet
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Where's the RIAA
I think I'm just going to cut off my ears and gouge out my eyes. Maybe then I'll only be sued for what I am thinking.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Is common sense too much to ask
On one side, the only peace and quite I get is on the plane. I can put my noise-cancelling headphones on and care less if you talk your head off, but at the same time don't have to worry about the 5 customers trying to get ahold of me. I'm going to have to deal with you when I get there anyway so leave me alone for the plane flight.
The other side is with airport pickups, delays and security the way that it is now... it would be nice to just pick up the phone real fast and make arrangments so not to inconvenience someone with the hassle of picking me up. Sometimes, waiting until we're taxiing or I'm in the terminal is too late with traffic, etc.
It seems the perfect solution is for people to use a little common sense. Decide what is an appropriate conversation to have and decide when you're speaking a bit too loud and be courteous to those around you. Sadly, all you have to do is look around or watch the news for 5 minutes to realize that will never EVER happen.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Talking on your phones!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
#2, with a picocell on every plane it is going to make it easier to use that phone whilest in flight, but they are going to be roaming. That roaming is going to cost them a lot more money. In fact, it will be comparable to using the sat phones on planes. All the plane is going to do is re-broadcast it through that or a simiilar system.
I would even argue that although the first month or so of being allowed that sure people will try this and it may be a pain in the ass. But when customers get their bill with the roaming charges on it... kaboom. This is going to get a lot of press and let's face it. Depending on the carrier and agreement you have, just for going into a roaming cell, you could be charged for jumping in there. Some phones you could even be charged if someone were to call you and go to voicemail, or you were to have a message or email automatically download.
The cost alone will make more people realize that they better shut off their phone! Can you imagine the message "Welcome to United flight 69, please ensure your seat belts are fastened. For your convenience, once we leave the gate, your flight will offer you access to the mobile phone network throughout the journey. If your phone is on, you could incur a $5 roaming set-up fee and yoru calls will be $2.99 per minute."
Now friends, that is what they are talking about here! They aren't doing this for your convenience. This is to support the airlines that are loosing money left right and center.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Internet would be more usefull than 'phone siganl, espeically if it becomes included in the ticket price, which would likely reduce th eprice by the effects of competition.
To reduce the problem of varying signal strength, it would probably be simple to make 'phnes adjst the volume to make the last second's average volume a set value. this would mean that people would not gradulally get louder as they talk.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
FCC and Cell Phones
Cell phone addicts are unconscious, disrespectful, discourteous and obnoxious. Public transportation and areas; doctors' offices; theaters; restaurants; checkout lines; just about everywhere. In their own dream world walking like zombies in the street, or "driving" their cars. Their business, everyone's business. Unable to bear silence or be by, or with, themselves for a moment. Totally oblivious to---and inconsiderate of---their neighbors.
Cell phones will be as ubiquitous in airplanes as they are in places where we are all held captive. These (ab)users ought to be relegated to their own soundproof cabin, compelled to suffer one another's inanities. For the entire flight.
I, and hopefully those who share these feelings, will give our business to the airlines that have the sense to ban them.
Emanuel Molho, New York, NY
[ link to this | view in chronology ]