Music Publishers Join In The Fun Of Suing XM
from the let's-all-sing-along dept
The Audio Home Recordings Act of 1992 makes it pretty clear that it's perfectly legal for consumers to make digital recordings of music for noncommercial use, and that companies that make and sell equipment allowing them to do so can't be sued for copyright violations. In spite of this, the RIAA sued satellite-radio company XM because it was marketing devices that let users record songs from XM broadcasts. Despite arguments from XM that the case shouldn't be allowed to move forward because of the AHRA, a judge disagreed, because the RIAA alleges XM is distributing music without a license, that somehow the ability to record its streams is legally different than a kid recording songs from FM radio onto a cassette tape. Now, music publishers are piling on by adding their own similar suit against XM, despite previous promises in the past from the recording industry that it wouldn't file suits over devices which allowed private, non-commercial recording -- but it's now splitting hairs by not suing over the device, but alleging XM isn't paying enough royalties to allow for recording. All of this comes amid attempts by the RIAA to get XM and Sirius to pay higher royalties, as well as efforts to get their buddies in Congress to enact a new law that would force them to do so. Do we have to pay royalties on the sound of the RIAA and its cronies trying to chip away at fair use, and other legally enshrined protections?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
RIAA can kiss my ass!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: RIAA can kiss my ass!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: RIAA can kiss my ass!
MPAA = The Walt Disney Company (Buena Vista), Sony Pictures, Paramount Pictures , 20th Century Fox, Universal Studios and Warner Bros.
Let's name them by their real names.
btw, notice the similarities between the two groups?
Sony, Universal and Warner... hmmm...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I can't follow this..
The government needs to step in and lay out what is fair use for the consumer and what is not. Right now we are can record music from FM only because the RIAA can't really crack down on it and the quality sucks.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Screams from a dying industry
Its dying... let them enact laws, and enforce them... let them throw more money down the Drain of holding back the digital tide.
When they figure out that the new generation of artists won't give them the time of day, they'll wither and die.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
sadness
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ridiculous
[ link to this | view in chronology ]