Security Firms Discover New Risk: People Say Stuff On Blogs And Social Network Sites!
from the oh-no! dept
Security firms always seem to be looking for new "risks" to hype up, some more ridiculous than others. The latest is that some security firm is claiming that "web 2.0" is a big security risk because people use things like blogs and social networks to communicate, and they might just communicate some top secret product plans or something. Other than that, the fear isn't exactly clear, though, you have to wonder if security firms released similar overhyped fear mongering reports when the telephone first became popular. You know that employees can leak information over the phone too? Fax machines are a big security hole as well. And, let's not forget that huge security hole known as actually talking to non-employees face-to-face. Something must be done!Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: But not at night
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Well that's dumb
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Well that's dumb
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The opposite of openness
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
BREAKING NEWS!!!!
The secret: Get people all worried about stuff like blogs and social networks so they will pay us to "help" them
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Our Comrade, the Sun
That's right, while your children are in their beds, dreaming the AMERICAN DREAM, that leftist pinko commie sun is shining down on those heathen bastards!
Something must be done!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Security Risks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Teaching Americans english is a bad idea, it would be better to let the two languages go thier seperate ways. That way, when the Americans are trying to use a language which is only bareley intelligible (like Portugese and Spanish, if you speak one you can vaugely understand the other), then people will recognise that the languages are happliy separating. Local content laws throughout the commonwealth, conservative press, and anti-Americanism will all help that divergence by reducing the flow of words adn usages from one to the other. Creating a perfect machine translator would be the ideal soltion, since this would allow the same site to show English and American text, with only one set of writing. the use of different US and British versions of books also helps this.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]