Would A Greentech Bubble Be Such A Bad Thing?
from the maybe-not dept
Paul Kedrosky highlights a key point all the way at the end of an article in the new business magazine, Portfolio, about the the growing interest from venture capital investors in "green tech" or "clean tech." What Kedrosky notes is Kleiner Perkins partner Ray Lane saying he expects there to eventually be a "bubble" in the space, as too much money starts chasing deals. Lane notes that a bubble can be bad for late investors, but usually works out for early investors. However, he misses the more important point about what bubbles mean for everyone else. As we've noted in the past, while bubbles may be bad for investors who pick the wrong players, overall, they can be very good for innovation. That's because investment bubbles allow for an awful lot of excess cash to be thrown at a large variety of attempts to innovate in a certain area. In other words, they allow a lot of ideas to be tried in a very short period of time to see what sticks. Obviously, lots of them will fail, but a few key ideas tend to survive and make it through. That's competition at its best -- and the net result is that some really innovative ideas are developed, tested and proved (or disproved) very quickly. While it may not work out for some of the investors in the space, the net result in terms of innovation can be quite beneficial.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Kewl
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Kewl
Its not stupidity that is causing us to consume resources faster than they can be replaced, it is overpopulation.
The ONLY to solve that problem is to get rid of excess population. The good news is we only need to kill off about 70-80% of the population.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Kewl
Well, the Bushies are off to a good start on reaching that goal. I finally understand their strategy! :(
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Kewl
>"Its not stupidity that is causing us to consume resources faster than they can be replaced, it is overpopulation."
Can we instead use the term "disconnectedness?" Stupidity doesn't address the heart of the issue, which is that we have become poorly connected, and insulated from each other and what we're creating, particularly in the west.
Reconnecting is important, and one promise of the net is not just downloading goat porn, but its facilitation of dialog.
I fundamentally disagree that large numbers of people on this planet must be extinguished for the planet to thrive. We just cannot continue down the same path, pretending that we can grow our economy and use of resources forever.
This recognition and reconnection will clearly will happen after the tipping point of destruction, at the latest. Can we help to avoid things getting that far before we wake up to the changes required?
Look at reconnecting with each other, with your community, and with your planet. Pass it on!
http://thegreatturning.net/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Kewl
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Some other benefits to bubbles...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
lets start with people like anonymous coward
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: lets start with people like anonymous coward
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: lets start with people like anonymous cowa
Not if the population decline was the result of institutionalized geriatricide.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: lets start with people like anonymous
"Hey guys, here’s the plan. We get all the old people in the world and string em up. They won’t mind, they lived long enough. Think of the children."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
LOL
There are plenty of ways to solve the problem. For instance, space travel. Build a ship to hold millions of people and send it off into space to look for another earth. Once there we can kill all the aliens and take the world. Bush can and will lead the way in that endeavor.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
overpopulation
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Save yourself
of existing on its own and free of humans. It did
so for a very long time and probably will again.
Population is a self-limiting problem. Once the
population is too large there is famine, disease and
war.
The environmental movement is human centric,
trying to maintain the status quo. All the while
denying that humans are a part of nature, not
seperate from it. More adaptable than dinosaurs,
perhaps.
That said...
I hate waste. If we could just reduce the wasteful
consumption it would go a long way to improving
the situation and maybe reducing the suffering.
(Although I fear it is inevitable.) Waste is evil, doubly
evil if it's done knowingly to prop up a sagging ego.
I do what I can. I've a small efficient house and
car that gets 50mpg. Frankly, I'd sick and tired of
being chastized by failed politicians living in mansions
and rock stars who own six private jets... both of
whom stand to profit from the hysteria they foment.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
there is one solution
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Geriatricide
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Getting Rid of People
No? Yeah, I didn't think so. It's funny how said people usually blithely assume that they will be among the 10% (or less) of the population that is left after the troublesome masses die.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
overpopulation
[ link to this | view in chronology ]