Saying You Have An Open WiFi AP May Not Help You Beat Child Porn Charges
from the what-would-matlock-do dept
CNet had a slightly bizarre story Wednesday as part of their regular series looking at the intersection of technology and the judicial system. A federal appeals court recently rejected the appeal of a Texas man convicted on child-porn charges, who'd argued that the fact that he had an open WiFi access point that anybody could access made the original search warrant for his home invalid. There are some strange parts to this tale. The case began when a woman in New York reported getting some child porn sent to her over Yahoo Messenger, and the FBI traced the sender back to an IP address from Time Warner Cable in Austin, Texas. The ISP gave up the name on the account using that IP, and a search warrant for the account holder's house was executed, and child porn was found in the account holder's part of the house. The man argued that the warrant should be invalid because the open AP meant one of his roommates or somebody outside the house could have sent the images that sparked the investigation -- and indeed, the Yahoo account was registered under the name "Mr. Rob Ram", and one of the guy's roommates was named Robert Ramos.While there would seem to be room for some doubt in all of this, the appeals court rightly noted that the level of proof needed for a warrant is much lower than that needed for a conviction, and the fact that child porn was sent from his IP is a reasonable basis to issue the search warrant. This case would appear to have some slight parallels to some of the RIAA's cases against file-sharers, where it simply goes after whoever holds the ISP account without making any effort to identify the actual copyright infringer. This idea of secondary liability isn't standing up for the RIAA, but it's a little different than what's being argued here. The charges against this man weren't based on what was sent from his ISP account; rather the FBI used that as the basis for an investigation that resulted in charges based on materials found in the guy's house. The RIAA, of course, doesn't really bother so much with the investigation part, preferring instead just to hit anybody they can with a lawsuit. One more twist to the child porn case: the guy entered a guilty plea to the charges, pending the outcome of this appeal. Arguing that you shouldn't have been caught, and not that you didn't do it, probably doesn't help your case much.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Well..
Regardless of the warrant, they DID find him in possession of child porn. So even if it was his roommate that sent the child porn over yahoo, this scumbag still deserved to be caught.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
access provisioning
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just a thought this early AM...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Its all well and good...
The real question is whether or not his argument makes any sense. In my opinion, it doesn't. Its true that the amount of evidence to secure a search warrant is a lot less than whats needed to prove someone is guilty. So, I don't see any rules broken here.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not everything is as it seems...
The most likely alternate circumstance: His roommate borrowed a cd and found the child porn. Wanting to avoid confrontation he sends the porn on his roommates behalf to get him in trouble and then replaces the disk. This scenario explains a lot of holes in the story as well as backing up the scumbag's story.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hang this weirdo
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The AP isnnt the problem.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The AP isnnt the problem.
I can also attest that the average home user of any WiFi Router only wants to be responsible enough of just plugging the damn thing in. Anything else they might have to do it, even resetting it, can infuriate a great deal of people.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Big difference between RIAA & Kiddi Porn
The RIAA is investigating people so they can sue them in civil court for "damages". It is a part of a civil action between a private company and private citizen.
The other is a criminal action between law enforcement and a private citizen. Law enforcement investigated this guy for the serious criminal violation of having kiddie porn.
Not even in the same leage. You can't compare the tactics of the RIAA to investigate a civil complaint to the tactics of law enforcement to investigate child porn distribution, which is not legal to own in any way, shape, or form.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How To Get Rid Of Neigbour You Don't Like
2. Send an IM with a link to CP
3. Watch him arrested
4. Repeat
[ link to this | view in chronology ]