Sex Lube Maker Finds Personal Info Quite Slippery
from the can't-get-a-grip dept
As personal data leaks go, this one's more potentially embarrassing than harmful, but the maker of the sexual lubricant Astroglide leaked the name and addresses of more than 250,000 people who asked for free samples over a four-year timespan. They've even got the gall to blame the issue on Google, since it was searches there that turned up the breach, and the search engine's cached copies haven't yet disappeared. Of course, this ignores the fact that the information was kept in a place where it was freely accessible, whether by Google's spiders, or by an individual. This leak really isn't particularly surprising given the regularity with which all kinds of personal info is leaked, lost or stolen these days. It just further illustrates that any information you provide to somebody can no longer be regarded as private. So little care is taken with personal information by so many companies these days, and these continual leaks bring only minor consequences. If companies can't even bother to keep something as innocuous as a name and address private, it's hard to have much faith they won't let other, more important information slide right on out too.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Of course they couldn't keep a hold of it...
What can you say, they make a quality product!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Of course they couldn't keep a hold of it...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Of course they couldn't keep a hold of it...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Of course they couldn't keep a hold of it...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Of course they couldn't keep a hold of it...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Of course they couldn't keep a hold of it...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Of course they couldn't keep a hold of it...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Of course they couldn't keep a hold of it...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Of course they couldn't keep a hold of it...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Of course they couldn't keep a hold of it...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Of course they couldn't keep a hold of it...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Of course they couldn't keep a hold of it...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Of course they couldn't keep a hold of it...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Of course they couldn't keep a hold of it...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Of course they couldn't keep a hold of it...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Of course they couldn't keep a hold of it...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Of course they couldn't keep a hold of it...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Of course they couldn't keep a hold of it...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Of course they couldn't keep a hold of it...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Of course they couldn't keep a hold of it...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Well, I guess you could say that their grasp on the situation is slip, sliding away!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
After 15 seconds of searching I found out how to do this via Google's tools. The cache was removed very quickly and easily.
Astroglide slipped up, apparently the lube is messier than they think. They need to clean up their own mess, not Google.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sorry Grandma
So what if your grandma can look up your name on the internet and find out you bought some lube...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sorry Grandma
> out you bought some lube...
So what if you can look up your grandmas name on the internet and find out she bought some lube?!?!?!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Sorry Grandma
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Sorry Grandma
This is the start of a very slippery slope....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Now that's what I call a sticky situation...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Good thing...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Good thing...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Good thing...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
need more
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: need more
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: need more
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: need more
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: need more
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: need more
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: need more
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yellow treats
What a whore!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Yellow treats
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]