Bay Bridge Traffic Problems Could Lead More Workers To Telecommuting
from the working-in-your-underwear dept
Despite things like high gas prices, environmental concerns and the supposed flexibility it gives, people remain largely uninterested in telecommuting. But following this weekend's gas-tanker accident that caused the collapse of a key overpass leading to the Bay Bridge near Oakland, officials are urging people to telecommute if they can to ease the expected months of traffic snarls. A significantly increased or more arduous commute could lead some people to decide to work from home, but pro-telecommuting groups are upset with what they see as a "telecommute only in case of emergency" message. Telecommuting itself isn't an objectively good or bad thing across the board, but if this situation prompts more employers to offer the flexibility of telecommuting to those employees who want it, that's great.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Which people?
And is the concern justified?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Telecommute
I'm all for telecommuting, and I know I'd love to be able to, but alas I cannot. I wish more companies would open up and allow people to telecommute, it would be a great deal easier for everyone involved.
Just my $0.02
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Telecommuting SUCKS
No matter how well you perform, EVERYONE assumes you are slacking off all day.
Obviously, IT SHOULDNT MATTER if you are doing what they paid you to do. But it does.
I refuse to telecommute. I don't need the pressure.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
when I telecommute
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
50 / 50 Responses
FWIW, I get more done at the office by putting my out of office on for several days and all but locking myself in a quiet room, or small conf room. Works for a while :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Either Or
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
telecommuting
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
To those who say they only play games when working from home, all I can say is you won't have a job for very long if you can't produce. Self-discipline aside, whether at home or in the office work is work and you either do it or you don't. Don't fool yourself and give your lack of work ethic a label just to "prove" how telecommuting doesn't work. Just because you don't want to work doesn't mean there are not plenty of us who do.
I may be wrong, but I think what the 'telecommuting industry' is having issues with is the whole idea that working from home is only a temporary fix or a band-aid when it can be a very viable and effective working situation over the long term. If employers can accommodate telecommuting even temporarily, then why not permanently or semi-permanently? Taking the view that it is a band-aid solution adds fuel to the age-old fire of how working from home isn't feasible in 'the real world'. It gives employers excuses, whether true or not, as to how it may have worked in an emergency situation, but still can never succeed as a more permanent environment.
Yes, there will always be those who need a babysitter or drill sergeant to get them to do what they are paid to do. They are the ones who will be phased out of the working world. Once I have proven to a potential or current employer all the benefits and savings of telecommuting, I have yet to hear them say anything negative about the situation. But there will always be those employers who refuse to actually listen to logic and would rather pay twice the expense for half the work. So as telecommuting progresses, it will be those non-conforming employers stuck with the non-producing employees left wondering why their business isn't making money. After all, why pay for an employee to sit at their desk with nothing to do when you could instead only be paying for the actual time worked!
Just my thoughts after working from home for the past 15 years...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Telecommuting is good
I think one of the biggest obstacles to telecommuting is the office manager who wants to see "bodies". Could programmers get the same job done if they worked from home? Sure they could. But then the office manager would have one less person in the office.
If a VP walks by, the office manager can point to the 10 people in the cubicles as "proof" of the 10 people on the team. How can the office manager "prove" the people who telecommute are actually at work?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]