Verizon Wireless Files Another Lawsuit Against Telemarketers, Solely For PR Purposes
from the smoke-and-mirrors dept
On multiple occasions, Verizon Wireless has tried to gloss over its security shortcomings with PR-friendly lawsuits. The suits attempt to draw attention away from the company's inability to protect customers' private information or to stop telemarketers from harassing its subscribers. It's filed yet another one of these suits, alleging some unknown party made more than 1 million calls to its customers using an autodialer. While Verizon's trying to look tough, the suit really does little more than expose their own inadequacies again. It notes that the calls all carried the same or similar caller ID, and were made as quickly as once every .83 seconds. Given that, couldn't the company have take some action against them, instead of letting them go and deciding simply to file a pointless lawsuit against an unknown party?Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
huh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: huh? I agree, how is this Verizon's fault?
I have been subjected to this type of invasion;
A call on my cellphone from a number I do not recognize.
I answer and loose at least 1 minute of my peak time.
Only to find it is a Spanish speaking pitch for activism.
Not only does it p***, I mean make me upset, It also
makes me upset with a group of people who would stoop
to such Low tactics.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: huh? I agree, how is this Verizon's fault
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: huh? I agree, how is this Verizon's f
Seems like a bit of a double standard to me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: huh? I agree, how is this Verizon's fault
Just because it is easy for Verizon to do, does not mean they should do it. How do you discriminate against calls?
No, Verizon is not in the police business.
Verizon is also not in the blocking calls business.
This is not a Verizon vulnerability.
This is a vulnerability of the phone system.
The ability to call a number every 0.83 seconds is not limited to Verizon.
Quit blaming Verizon for the fault of others.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
what can Verizon Do?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Voicemail back door...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Solution to Telemarketing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The Solution to Telemarketing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Go After Telemarketers
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Consistency, please
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
From Verizon Wireless guy . . .
First and foremost, we're trying to protect our relationship with our customers. They get unwanted calls from telemarketers, and the first place they report it often isn't a state regulator or the FCC or another federal body . . . it's the wireless service company.
Jeffrey Nelson
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cell Carriers failing grade for technology
[ link to this | view in chronology ]