Exclusivity Worked So Well For Mobile ESPN The First Time, So Why Not Try It Again?

ESPN's virtual operator failed spectacularly when hardly anybody cared about its content and data services enough to make them want to switch mobile operators, and pay premium prices to boot. We argued at the time that ESPN should stick to its content distribution roots and sell its content through as many outlets as possible. The company has now revived its mobile operations, and will be just a content provider -- but it's signed an exclusive deal with Verizon Wireless. Users who subscribe to Verizon's V CAST content service, and who have one of a handful of compatible handsets, will be able to get the ESPN data application and services for free as part of their subscription. On a strategic level, it's hard to understand the logic here. After all, as we've pointed out, would ESPN ever offer its cable channels through an exclusive deal with a single provider? Of course not. On a tactical level, though, this was about the only option ESPN had, since the apps it used with the MVNO were all for the BREW platform, and Verizon's the only operator with a nationwide presence that uses it. So there's another strategic misstep: developing for a closed platform that's only used by a single operator. There's nothing like taking steps to limit your own potential market to ensure the success of your business.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    tc1 uscg, 17 May 2007 @ 12:29pm

    What's different

    ESPN couldn't survive as a MVNO, what the hell do they think they can make it just because they have Verizons name attached? News flash for ESPN. Nobody wanted you then, no body cares about you now. Give it up and stick to national TV.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    James Quintana Pearce, 17 May 2007 @ 12:29pm

    I was surprised at the exclusive deal too...I'm guessing it's because the app is licensed and Verizon was willing to pay more for exclusivity. And maybe no-one else was bidding... ESPN tried to make it look like they had chosen Verizon out of a desperate crush of suitors, but...

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.