Can You Patent Adding An MP3 Player To A Washing Machine?
from the KSR-v.-Teleflex dept
The main point in the Supreme Court's ruling on patent obviousness in the KSR vs. Teleflex decision was that simply taking two known technologies and mashing them together doesn't necessarily constitute a patentable invention. Hopefully, the patent office will pay attention to that ruling when a new patent application from electronics maker LG gets reviewed. The Inquirer points us to a patent application from LG for adding an MP3 player to a home appliance. This patent was filed a year ago, well before the Supreme Court ruling -- so hopefully companies will start recognizing that they shouldn't even bother filing such frivolous patents.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
2 in one day.
I'm beginning to take this personally.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Patentdirt
I think we get it. The patent system stinks. GET OVER IT!
Now lets get to the important stuff like how Apple sucks or how MS is evil or how someone got fired via a text...you know the stuff we all actually care about!
Seriously..I get it...you guys hate the patent laws...I get it.
Did I mention that I get that fact that you hate the patent rules?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Patentdirt
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Patentdirt
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Patentdirt
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Patentdirt
That place is called digg.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
wow
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Whatever.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Patent
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mash that and the UK challenge
Software isn't patentable in EU, but if an invention has software as part of a bigger thing, where the inventiveness is not in the software, but the bigger thing as a whole, then that bigger thing is patentable.
Perhaps an example:
A patent on a computer controlled time machine is a patentable time machine invention, because a time machine would be a new novel thing.
but
A patent on the software CONTROL UNIT for a time machine isn't patentable because the novelty is in the software, a CONTROL UNIT of itself isn't a new thing.
They're suing because they want to be able to block others from shipping software *on disks* that infringes on the software part of their bigger patent.
The *disks* part is important, they don't want this to look like a battle over software patents, the disks adds a hardware element.
Since the UK and German courts have overturned that stupid European Patent Office ruling, they're trying to make it seem that the UK is out of step with Europe, when in fact it's leading the way in correcting a mistake the EPO made in 1997 and the UK & German courts have already ruled was not following patent law.
So do a quick mash up here.
If you can patent an MP3 player combined with a fridge , and you can split the patent into parts and sue for the parts individually, then you can sue for a MP3 player with fridge magnet attached, because that could be used to make an MP3/fridge combination.
i.e. it's dumb, dumb dumb dumb.
The lawyer behind it is Keith Beresford a lobbyist/lawyer that promotes software patents, and minor incremental patents:
http://eupat.ffii.org/papri/beresford00/index.en.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://nodwick.humor.gamespy.com/ffn/index.php?date=2007-05-30
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
From the "it can slice, it can dice.." department
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Compact & Ventless Combo Washer Dryer | Free Shipping - USA
[ link to this | view in chronology ]