Next Up: Patenting Security Patches?

from the you-can't-be-serious dept

The crazed focus on extending patent coverage to just about anything may be about to take it's next step. John writes in to point us to the news of a company that is trying to patent security patches. In some ways, this is a direct follow up to the market for security vulnerabilities we were talking about earlier this week. The has recognized that finding vulnerabilities is becoming so valuable, that they might as well start patenting the patches. They're asking security researchers to go to them first with vulnerabilities, and they'll file a patent on the patch. Now, this seems ridiculous, given the amount of time it takes to get a patent, but the company thinks it can fast track these patents. The whole thing seems so over-the-top ridiculous that I'm not convinced it's not satire. I'm hoping that it's simply a spoof to demonstrate the reductio ad absurdum of current patent policy. Update: Apparently I'm not alone in wondering if this is a parody.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Charles Griswold, 8 Jun 2007 @ 3:21pm

    Is this legal?

    This sounds suspiciously like extortion to me, and extortion is illegal.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    GoblinJuice, 8 Jun 2007 @ 3:30pm

    DAMNIT! Why didn't I think of this?!

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Shun, 8 Jun 2007 @ 3:58pm

    Derivative Work?

    If you are aware of a security vulnerability, but do not tell the vendor, are you liable for any damages resulting in someone using that vulnerability to exploit systems?

    This is why open source and full disclosure are so powerful. Both prevent the vendor from hiding behind veils of perceived security.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Bdragun, 8 Jun 2007 @ 5:45pm

    Patches

    How ridiculous!Patents should be reserved for items that benefit humanity not patches and all this other bullshit.Maybe I could patent the way I ride my motorcycle or my style of parenting?What kind of idiots have been put in charge of the US Patents office?Totally stupid and as the man says"you can't fix stupid"!

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    bay area guy, 8 Jun 2007 @ 11:48pm

    What if you fix it yourself?

    It may not be a solution for everyone, but what if you read about a vulnerability and decide to fix the program yourself.

    Could you be infringing on some security company's patented SpiffyFix?

    What if said company decides NOT TO LICENSE THE PATENT?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Dirtboy, 9 Jun 2007 @ 11:27am

    Software patents

    Companies like Microsoft love their software patents. This might be the wakeup call they need to realize that it goes both ways.

    This looks like programmers creating software for financial benefit. User benefits are secondary. Its windows users using MS's own business model against them.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Adam, 10 Jun 2007 @ 7:03am

    I think this is some kind of parody. How can a 3rd party patent security patches for another company software???

    A.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    brian, 11 Jun 2007 @ 5:45am

    Imma gonna patent teh english and look what you guys are gonna speeeeeeak!

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.