Appeals Court Says E-Voting Company Doesn't Need To Reveal Source Code
from the this-again? dept
Back in January, a district court turned down the request from the losing candidate in a Florida election trying to see the source code of the e-voting machine, since it appeared to lose a ton of votes. The judge in that case worried that exposing the code to experts for review (not to the whole world) would somehow violate the company's trade secrets. An appeals court has now agreed, and will not force ES&S to hand over the code even though a report between the two cases showed that ES&S knew its machines were buggy while experts like Ed Felten show that a bug in the software could explain the mistakes found in the system. But, of course, protecting the "trade secrets" of a company that can't program straight is apparently more important than, say, a functioning democracy.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
On the plus side.....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: On the plus side.....
That's not a racial reference.
It could easily be cream-colored cats vs. calico cats but you're going to be eaten, whatever you think and whether you like it or not.
I'll attribute this to Tommy Douglas of the Saskatchewan New Democratic Party in Canada.
By the way, he also thought up the idea of universal health care, so poor people wouldn't die quite so often in hospital emergency rooms.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: On the plus side.....
a democracy would be fail here because our country somehow elected lil bush TWICE... i can't see myself giving more power to those kinds of people.
where is our philosopher king??
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: On the plus side.....
Given the choice oh wait there really wasnt a choice hmm dumb or dumber which should I choose......
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Boo Hoo
I demand that you withdraw your statements and side with the E-Voting company. If you don't, I may be forced to issue a DMCA, contact your ISP and/or take legal action*
*denotes sarcasm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Trade Secrets in a voting machine's source code?
When you pick candidate B, how many ways are there to indicate that you picked candidate B? Are there any trade secrets involved in that selection or it's recording? How can there be 'trade secrets' in a voting machine if all it's doing is recording and tallying the actual votes that were entered? The answer is that there shouldn't be, and all the protesting to the contrary is to keep people from reviewing and finding the real 'secrets' that are hidden in the voting machines source code (how it is programmed to ignore certain votes, counts them for the wrong candidate, etc - not that any of this would even be in the source code, unless the company was rather stupid, this manipulation is all done externally at the polling stations...)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It is Florida after all
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Thanks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
We are fucked.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Same old same old
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Shocked
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
SIMPLE
I am all for Free markets, but not when it comes to something so fundamentally important as tallying our votes.
Anything else for e-voting is a joke / a conflict of interest / danger to our democracy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Great...
And sad thing is that most of it will be some sore politician that wants to cry foul.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's because it's rubbish
Half the electorate in that area didn't have their vote counted.
If my machines did that, I'm damn sure I'd be embarassed about anyone else seeing the source code!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]