Turns Out, $7.5 Million For Business.com Wasn't So Bad

from the the-big-score dept

It's commonly believed that the $7.5 million paid for the domain name business.com was one of the surest signs of irrational exuberance displayed during the dot-com bubble. But according to The Wall Street Journal, the site is raking in several million dollars per year and is looking to sell out for between $300 and $400 million. At this point, there's a little more here than just a domain name, but it's still hard to tell how much of a business business.com actually is. Ostensibly it's a popular search engine for business needs, but the site itself looks like little more than one of those fake search engines that typosquatters and domainers put up. Still, if the company is as profitable as it's said to be, someone is bound to come in and snap it up.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Wyatt, 22 Jun 2007 @ 11:38am

    whooha

    I want to buy techdirt for $4.. please...

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Faceless Minion, 22 Jun 2007 @ 11:42am

      Re: whooha

      What wonderful witticism, Wyatt. Why, I daresay that you rival the "FIRST POST LULZ" posters with the humor inherent in your statement.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      DittoBox, 22 Jun 2007 @ 12:24pm

      Re: whooha

      What an insignificant troll.

      I bid 10 dollars, USD. Wyatt can sit in his little hovel with 4 bucks Canadian monopoly money and rot.

      (yes, I'm joking)

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 22 Jun 2007 @ 11:44am

    Simple...

    adspace in a place that is likely to get a lot of accidental traffic and the hope that some sucker will be willing to pay a hell of a lot more for it than you did.

    business.com is just an old relic of the first dot com era and appearantly the owners found some analysts (which seems to be greek for gossip mill) to hype it up just in time to sell it.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Smrt, 22 Jun 2007 @ 12:16pm

    To hard to spell

    It will never catch on 'cos i can never manage to spell buisness corectly.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Gid, 22 Jun 2007 @ 2:30pm

    Oh, Behave!

    Dr. Evil: Okay, here's the plan. We get the warhead and then hold the world ransom for... 1 MILLION dollars!
    Number Two: [clears throat] Sir, strictly speaking, a million dollars will not go very far these days. Virtucon alone makes over 9 billion dollars a year.
    Dr. Evil: Really? Okay then... we hold the world ransom for 1... hundred... BILLION dollars!

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 23 Jun 2007 @ 2:34am

    tech bust here we come again.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Jake Lockley, 28 Jun 2007 @ 7:50pm

    They are traffic brokers. Even Google has deals with them. My question is, how many bottom feeders are out there making money off of a self-feeding system? If Google and all the other brokers do nothing but trade traffic back and fourth to ensure the ads they sell get hits, shouldn't it be obvious those buying the ads are idiots? Have you ever clicked on an online ad?

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.