Where's That Old 286 Machine When You Need It?
from the reaching-back-in-time dept
Reader Dave submitted a story from the BBC on a push by the UK National Archives to ensure that older file formats can be read in the future, so that a "digital dark hole" isn't created by incompatibility with modern machines. While it's something of a puff piece hyping up a Microsoft deal with the Archives to cooperate on solutions to run virtualized versions of its older software, it does raise a somewhat interesting issue: as the amount of our digital archives grow, both personally and collectively, file compatibility with modern software and hardware could become a growing problem. Of course, as is pointed out in the article, the use of proprietary, closed file formats -- like those typically favored by the likes of Microsoft -- doesn't really help, but hopefully raised awareness of the problem can help spare both national archives and individual users the pain of losing some of their digital history to incompatibility.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Here we go again
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Screaming
I can't imagine trying to manage this kind of data retention on a large scale. We're just a small business. Much of our 3-5 year old data is stored on Zip disks, and we keep an extra external drive just in case we ever need it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Screaming
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Screaming
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Screaming
Also, people need external floppy drives because a good share of the "home user" PCs and even business PCs now come without floppy drives by default, and some are designed such that you can't even install one after the fact because there's no bay for it (this is why I build my own computers).
How about you sell that cave of yours and join us in the new millennium?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Storage Media
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Obligatory MS bash
They're not talking about physical formats (punched cards? easy), just applications and data formats. Fine. If you've digitised and stored 4 petabytes of Word 6 files, you can probably afford to store .iso images of the Win95 and Office CDs and retrieve the data through a VM in the future. Problem solved.
This is actually vaguely newsworthy if you look at it another way, though - MS have hit upon a blindingly obvious idea, but instead of trying to patent it as usual, they've decided to exploit it for some publicity.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Obligatory MS bash
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bigger problem here than just file formats
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Bigger problem here than just file formats
The optical storage medium is the best, unfortunately, the self-created CDs/DVDs don't have longevity. The dyes that are burned on the disc have been shown to fade causing data loss.
One could argue that the best storage method is paper, if handled correctly. The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution have survived two plus centuries and are still readable.
Storage doesn't need to be backward compatible forever. Administrators need to make the determination what needs to be saved and what doesn't. Special documents require additional storage requirements and will always need to be updated if needed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Bigger problem here than just file formats
I have to agree with the guy above Microfiche is the best. It takes up more room, but to read it, all you need is a light and a big white wall. Optical storage would still require the correct hardware. As hardware advances, you'd have to continually upgrade and transfer, etc, etc, etc. As time progresses, this could take weeks, even months to do.
Microfiche is technologically independent. If you want to periodically have a scanned archive, machines exist that just read and scan them into computers VERY quickly.
Seriously, microfiche is the way to go for archives. Easily created, easily read.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Bigger problem here than just file for
Then you said "Microfiche is technologically independent. If you want to periodically have a scanned archive, machines exist that just read and scan them into computers VERY quickly."
Now let me get straight, you expect us to believe that straight digital archiving is very slow but if you then insert some the extra steps of printing out to Microfiche and then scanning back in it suddenly becomes VERY quick? That's just nuts.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Bigger problem here than just file formats
Some storage DOES need to be backwards compatible forever. Sometimes its a matter of archiving history. You don't just erase it. It's a glimpse into our past as we continue to grow. Yea, it might not prove extremely useful 10 years from now, but a couple hundred years from now, I hope they can look back on news articles and what not with ease.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Bigger problem here than just file formats
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
best ever
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dark ages
I know I have lost data over the years - my Zip drive stopped working, floppies got demagnetized, DDS tapes are a pain, etc. Mapped out over the whole culture, such a scenario is not implausible.
There are other projects looking at this problem, such as the Long Now people, but Microsoft PR could actually act as a force for good in this instance by raising the profile of the issue.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Preventing Innovation
Using zip drives still? Floppy drives? It's time to move on, flash drives are so cheap, more effective, and a helluva lot faster. And you don't hear too many people asking, "is there anyway you can rescue any of my data off this thumb drive?" but it happens all the time with floppies.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Preventing Innovation
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Best arciving format ever!
Seriously, would it not be just as easy to take that old data out every few years and update it with the latest format? For example, if you have an old Word 97 document, could you not just open it in 2007 and resave it? I know it is probably a lot of work, but if the data is that important, wouldn’t it be worth it? I smell a new business coming on! Data Updaters Inc… “Let up update your old crap!”
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Into the Public Domain
Additionally companies should release FINAL versions of software on a CD. The internet facilitates the issuance of patches to fix software flaws. However, once that product is discontinued the patches may be difficult, if not impossible, to find should the product have to be reinstalled.
PS: I am not against companies requiring a nominal payment, shipping and handling, for the FINAL CD. Microsoft, are you listening? WIndows98!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Got an 8-incher over here...
So yeah, this isn't really new news at all but the fact is that we have to decide WHAT formats we are going to preserve because there'll be some bureaucrat that will use a freeware program from 1991 to record his data and then the hard drive he had the program on will crash and it'll be discovered that he can't find the program any longer, and this will drive the cost of the gubment up by another 55 trillion dollars.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Microsoft playing it both ways
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Media
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
oh yeah......here it comes!
we just need to take a lesson from nature in this regard., nothing lasts forever and sooner or later everything we create will go away. Data loss in inevitable, we live and we die, whatever we learned is forever lost, as it should be.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: oh yeah......here it comes!
Uh, no, whatever we learned is passed on from one generation to the next by one means or another. Whether it's oral, chiseled, painted, written, typed, bound, pressed, digitized or otherwise archived.... the information survives and is passed on.
If what we learn is forever lost when we die, none of us would ever learn anything beyond what we experience first-hand. We'd all still be living in caves, because the guy that figured out how to build a house died, and the information on how to build houses is now gone forever.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bigger problem here than just file formats
For the want of a horse shoe nail ... the future was lost ??
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Formats for Luddites
[ link to this | view in chronology ]