Saying The DOS Microsoft Originally Used Was A Rip-Off Isn't Libel
from the talk-about-sore-winners dept
Back in 2005, we wrote about the case of Tim Paterson, the creator of QDOS (which was eventually sold to Microsoft and became the basis of Microsoft DOS -- and, with it, the Microsoft empire). Paterson was pissed off at author Harold Evans for claiming in a book that Paterson had ripped off Gary Kildall's CP/M. It really isn't disputed that QDOS was modeled on CP/M -- or that Microsoft (and Paterson) eventually won out in the marketplace. So it's hard to see what the beef is here, and as Slashdot points out, it appears the judge agreed. The judge tossed out the suit saying that there didn't appear to be any libel in what was said. Most of the statements were opinions, so they can't be shown to be provably false. Also, they found no evidence of malicious intent, which would also be needed in this case. In the end, though, this certainly seems like the case of a sore winner. Paterson's software was the one that went on to greatness, whether or not it was a rip-off over Kildall's stuff.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
greatness?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: greatness?
1. unusually or comparatively large in size or dimensions: A great fire destroyed nearly half the city.
2. large in number; numerous: Great hordes of tourists descend on Europe each summer.
3. unusual or considerable in degree, power, intensity, etc.: great pain.
12. much in use or favor: “Humor” was a great word with the old physiologists.
I think these meanings are all applicable to DOS and is Windows succors.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: greatness?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Saying The DOS Microsoft Originally Used Was A Rip
I believe the judge who ruled in that case was wise because he was able to recognize a frivolous lawsuit and rightfully tossed it aside.
Ikey Benney
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Stating the obvious!
No one disputed that "fact" 20+ years ago when there was plenty of cross pollination between CPM and QDOS and later DRDOS, etc.
Thank goodness that folks can still (occasionally) state the obvious truth without fear of libel action!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Although, I would call it an improvement upon CP/M - not really a 'rip-off'.
It doesn't even matter, really. Glad to see it tossed out.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ripoff, homage or bkwd compat
The first few versions of DOS were certainly NOT an improvement on CP/M. DOS won in the marketplace for the same reason VHS beat Beta - nobody cared which was better, only "want did everybody else buy?".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rip-off
Personally I disagree with the Judge. The common use of the expression "rip-off" clearly connotes something which is illegal or otherwise improper.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]