Automatic Airport Check-In Is Patented?
from the but-why? dept
I've been flying a lot over the past few years, and it's become pretty standard for airlines to now have self-serve kiosks where you can check in and print out a boarding pass. If you have a bag to check, you then take it to a "bag drop" station. There are fewer and fewer places where this isn't the norm -- but apparently Alaska Airlines owns a patent on the process. The company says it got the patent to "reward the employees" who came up with the idea, but that doesn't make much sense. As William Stepp points out in the link above, wouldn't Alaska Airlines have been better off not spending all that money filing a patent. In fact, if they wanted to reward the employees who came up with the idea, why not just give the money wasted on the patent filing to the employees?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: airports, bag drop, check-in, patents
Companies: alaska airlines
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Why?
Why do that when you can wait and sue every major airline *and* every major airport in the country, give some small token percentage to the employees and keep the rest for yourself?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Patentable - sure wtfn
So what do you do? Do you say - "Let's make a copy of the way other carriers do this, say it's different because the vehicle is shiny and flies - and say therefore that it's unique and patent it?" The WSJ (short) article said the idea was unconventional but included nothing to suggest it was 'novel.'
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Upcoming patents...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
advantages
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Alaska's Patent
Alaska Airlines, simply due to the remote nature of some of it's destinations, has been on the forefront of technology for commercial airlines for a very long time. Did you know that Alaska is the only airline to successfully land a plane with true zero visibility? They did it using a system they invented.
The web/kisok checkin that Alaska created was jeered by all the airlines that now use a similar system. It was at the dawn of the internet age, and debuted at Sea-Tac International Airport (Seattle, WA) Alaska's hub.
It is interesting that despite how much most of you protest the patent system, this type of system has become so prolific despite the patent. Maybe a patent does not kill innovation after all. Maybe it is the enforcement by companies that think the only way to make money from the patent is a law suit to prevent others from using it. (Not to say that Alaska is not licensing the technology at a reasonable price to other airlines.)
Oh and by the way -- Alaska airline treats their employees very well, you can easily tell by the level of service you receive compared to other airlines. I have never not been greeted with a smile, and I always feel well taken care of on an Alaska flight. (And yes, I have flown several other airlines, None of them even come close)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Alaska's Patent
Never said that patents *kill* all innovation, but they do hinder innovation. In other words, the spread of this offering appears to have happened *in spite* of the patent, not because of it. Without the patent, the concept would still have spread, so how can you say that the spread is due to the patent?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why not indeed?
Probably accidental, but the patent will end up being a far better reward than cash. Their future careers will get a pretty good boost from having their name on such a patent.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How I make money
There is the one handed grab, lift and drop into the trunk, the two-handed grab, lift and drop into the trunk and the leave it by the curb and let the taxi driver load it technique (one-handed and two-handed, of course).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Reward employees
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
why not just give the money wasted on the patent filing to the employees?
...because patents can be filed as cheaply as a few hundered dollars per patent. are you suggesting to split that insignificant amount amongst a group of employees?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]