What Right To Privacy Do You Have In An Age Of User-Generated Media?
from the not-very-much dept
Dave writes in to point to a ruling by the "Press Complaints Commission" in the UK, saying that the media needs to be careful to respect individual's privacy rights in making use of user-generated media. As we all know, many news organizations have increasingly learned to leverage the fact that so many people are carrying around mobile phones that can take photos and record video. When news stories break, the news organizations are more than willing to make use of this content to add value to the story -- as they should. However, what if the video is taken in private somewhere and reveals things it shouldn't? That was the case before the PCC, where a news organization had used a student's cameraphone video of an unruly classroom in a story. The school complained that no one had given consent to be filmed. The PCC noted that the story clearly was a matter of public interest, but that the people in the video should have been hidden, so as not to be as easily identified.Of course, this sounds good in theory, but becomes very tricky in practice. In fact, this story is similar to one a few years ago, where a school punished the students for filming an angry outburst by a teacher, rather than blaming the teacher for the outburst. The efforts to hide these videos often comes across more as a way to coverup the very problem that resulted in the filming in the first place. It's like blaming a whistle blower. At the same time, it's ridiculous to think that such content can be blocked. Sure, they can tell "the media" that it can't use that kind of content, but that won't stop the content from showing up on YouTube anyway. In fact, this ruling makes it harder for the "official" media to report on certain stories, while guaranteeing that others will do so instead.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: newspapers, user-generated content, video
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Teachers
STUDENTS PREVOKE A TEACHER TO YELL so they can record it on their phones!. At my school we dont have this problem yet. but on my trip to europe, i saw this alot. depantsing ect.
so, what do you think is right ?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Teachers
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Teachers
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Teachers
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Privacy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Awesome Article Mr Masnick
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's because they're minors
This would have been just fine if they'd blurred the faces. The problem is you're not allowed to show minors on TV without the consent of their legal guardians.
This had nothing to do with "hiding the unruly actions of teenagers" but is a reaction to a long-standing set of laws against the news media (print, television, or otherwise) "profiting" off of the display of a minor's image.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I for one avoid news cameras like the plague when I see them in the streets, I don't want to be on camera, even if I'm just a passerby.
The simple fact is the news agency should have blurred the background students faces. It's not that hard to do, they're just lazy with their free media footage.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Do we tell NBC that they can air what they like? Do we restrict YouTube? Can you now sue your neighbor for putting film of you on YouTube?
Google is taking pictures, kind of the "what you will see at this location" deal, do people have a right to privacy, not having their image spread to the world?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
students aren't allowed to film without consent
[ link to this | view in chronology ]