Researchers Want To Test How The Plague Would Spread In World Of Warcraft

from the all-for-the-sake-of-research dept

There are all sorts of questions about how the government would respond in the event of a serious outbreak of a dangerous virus or a plague. Certainly, various gov't agencies have plans and procedures in place, but it's difficult to account for all the different possibilities and how something might spread. However, some researchers have an idea for how they might get a better idea and perhaps get some training in at the same time: use online video games like "World of Warcraft" and see what happens when some players are infected with a contagious plague. The researchers note that "World of Warcraft" had its own plague a few years ago, which gave them the original idea to approach Blizzard to work out some sort of deal to do this kind of research. They hope that by seeing how real people react, with virtual characters whom they've invested a lot of time in, they'll get a better idea of how people react to certain situations such as quarantines. Whether or not it actually will work, it certainly seems like a creative solution to get a better understanding of some potential scenarios, prior to an actual emergency situation.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: plagues, world of warcraft
Companies: blizzard


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Josh, 21 Aug 2007 @ 8:10am

    Hmmm...

    As someone who knows a thing or two about theoretical epidemiology, this sounds interesting. Although I'm skeptical about the level of realism that could be done here...

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 21 Aug 2007 @ 8:12am

    First people suck!!!

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    AA in LA, 21 Aug 2007 @ 8:32am

    Now that's putting (fun) technology to good use. I would think that some variables can be modelled mathematicallY (virus incubation period, infection rates) but this might improve any such study by providing the often unpredictable human variable.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    dorpus, 21 Aug 2007 @ 8:32am

    Real Life Experiments

    What if there are real life diseases in which mobs of netters decide to single out an individual at random, posting fake "wanted" posters of him?

    These fake wanted posters of a college student are circulating in Japan, and thousands of stalkers are following his every move. They have randomly accused him of molesting a minor, harrassing his neighbors, planting computer viruses, jerking off in public, etc.

    http://monkeyuploader.dyndns.org/Offering/mnkyup4267.jpg

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      blog patrol, 21 Aug 2007 @ 10:14am

      Re: Real Life Experiments

      Finally, a face to go with the name. Were not far behind you now, fool.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Overcast, 21 Aug 2007 @ 8:44am

    It will be very far from accurate indeed.

    Consider a number of things:

    People can simply logoff a video game if they are unhappy or annoyed with something. Also, regardless of whatever situation they are in, the vast majority realize it's only a game, there's no real issue of life and death involved.

    It's like basing your football team's strategy off of a game where you're playing other people. Fine - you may get some idea of how the other side will react, but question is - was the other player really paying attention? Also, in a virtual world, there are a limited number of variables that can be taken into account, whereas in reality, the number of variables is infinite in many cases, and extremely vast in others, but never a small number.

    How many factors would come into play with the spread of a real plague? Just physical alone - depending on the communicability of the disease, even wind and humidity might come into play.

    Perhaps they will get a bit of a 'social engineering' aspect to this, but it would be minor, at best, I suspect.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Log off?, 21 Aug 2007 @ 8:48am

      Re:

      To some people WOW is there real world.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 21 Aug 2007 @ 8:59am

      Re:


      How many factors would come into play with the spread of a real plague? Just physical alone - depending on the communicability of the disease, even wind and humidity might come into play.

      Perhaps they will get a bit of a 'social engineering' aspect to this, but it would be minor, at best, I suspect.

      I'm going to guess you have not played games since ATARI. Games have come along way since the days of 5 variables and 2 dimensions. In world of warcraft, I know that their different geographic regions support weather patterns and such already. Attributes such as wind and humidity are nothing but mathematical values that can be assigned to the world as a whole and influenced via correlation with weather variables. The results would be relatively accurate, since the really contagious viruses can only be spread through a few means.

      If you factor that the virtual virus is air born and a humidity of x increases the viral transfer potential by a factor of y, and correlate the dispersion with wind speed of z, you can make some pretty accurate assessments of infection rates. Viruses will have a certain life expectancy wile airborne, so if you can figure out how long it would theoretically be active enough while in the air, you can figure out about how likely people are to contract it based on the physical variables of the location. Of course it will never be 100% accurate because in real life we have other factors such as perspiration, immune systems, air circulation systems, so fourth, that just are not included in WoW.

      The single greatest influence on how a virus spreads, in my opinion, is the reaction people have to the virus. If all the virus does is turn you green and make you look stupid, people won't actively work very hard to avoid it. If it seriously impairs your character and could impact your game play, you will find that people either work to avoid potential sources, or do not play the game in general. Generally players of games like WoW would continue to play, at least from what I have seen, but would not travel to potential infection sites and would possibly seek isolation for the duration of the experiment. Much as people do in reality.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Casper, 21 Aug 2007 @ 8:45am

    Not a bad idea

    This actually kind of sounds like fun. It would be quite interesting to see how the populations reacted to a virus, specifically if it had a significant impact. If the virus made you run at half speed in the game and when you died it would not allow you to use the character for a week or two, it would be enough to cause players to seriously evaluate where they traveled in game and who they were hanging out with.

    Whoever was the first to start selling SARS masks in WoW would make a fortune.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    White Pheonix, 21 Aug 2007 @ 8:46am

    As opposed to ...

    This is, of course, alongside simulations of how diseases spread, with every variable of a simulated city known, and, in some cases, every detail of a few million residents known and used to create these simulations (the last time I heard about this was a few years ago, but at the point they had it up and running, so I think that it's safe to assume that it still exists, and is in use).

    The advantages of using WOW to test how a plague spreads is that you can find out how people react to various things, such as quarantines. After all, it is fairly hard to model panic with computers, when people behave irrationally.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Petréa Mitchell, 21 Aug 2007 @ 8:57am

    The Sims Plague

    I wonder if any epidemiologists got involved in studying what happened when disease was introduced into the online Sims a few years ago? That would be some interesting reading, too.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 21 Aug 2007 @ 8:57am

    Re: To some people WOW is there real world.

    And those are the people they're going to base this study on! Then we'll know how the rest of the population would react in real life! LOL

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    :, 21 Aug 2007 @ 9:01am

    It'll spread like blood elves after the last expansion. Though, if you infected everyone, you'd have to watch their real life counterparts spaz out. Their avatars won't be enough to show the anguish they'd feel from having their $15/month wasted investment 100% wasted. I mean, it's not enough that you pay $15 to have your time further wasted by corpse runs and resurrection sickness. You've gotta really stick it to 'em with a virus to make em realize they're wasting time & money.. and time IS money, so it's like double taxation.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Deliverator, 21 Aug 2007 @ 9:15am

    Griefing would ruin the study

    Researchers may find that involving the players directly will ruin the study. For instance, if players figure out that proximity to others will spread the virus (duh!) then players will begin to go out of their way to infect others.

    Perhaps you could liken this to the office-idiot that comes to work sick, but that may be stretching pretty thin.

    It might be better to hide the information from player though, conversely, that would mask data where some people isolate themselves when they know they are sick.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    GoblinJuice, 21 Aug 2007 @ 9:15am

    WoW = Plague

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    lplimac, 21 Aug 2007 @ 9:21am

    It's been tried in a smaller scale in games other

    The MMO Horizons tried this, where some of the monsters you fought would infect you and you could spread it to anyone you came in close contact with I think it was based on distance). It wasn't very effective because the cure was easy to get (I remember all the OOC requests for the cure) so it was really never much of a problem, and Horizons wasn't a real popular game.

    I don't remember all the specifics of what the plague did (it's been years since I played), I think it reduced your hit points, stamina and other stats over time, then incapacitated you. I don't remember a case ever getting that far because the ease of obtaining the cure.

    For this to be a effective experiment in WoW they would have to make the effects serious to the character, maybe permanent. I doubt that Blizzard would want to do that because it would seriously piss the players off, not what you want to do to paying customers.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      TheDock22, 21 Aug 2007 @ 9:37am

      Re: It's been tried in a smaller scale in games ot

      For this to be a effective experiment in WoW they would have to make the effects serious to the character, maybe permanent. I doubt that Blizzard would want to do that because it would seriously piss the players off, not what you want to do to paying customers.

      Actually I bet they would just offer free play to anybody who wanted to participate in the study and then setup a different server from the one paying customers play on. I think it would be a good experiment, although I doubt you could draw much information from it since it is a virtual character. When I get bored with role playing games, my virtual beings usually fall to a creative demise.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    dave, 21 Aug 2007 @ 9:24am

    Snow Crash

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Ryan, 21 Aug 2007 @ 9:31am

    Time to go a bit superdork...

    I thought this had already happened in WoW, well slightly

    When the Zul'Gurub instance was introduced, one DoT that wsa passable between characters was Corrupted Blood, that did massive amounts of damage. Hugh level hunters would get their pet infected then dismiss the pet, until they were back in ironforge where they'd resummon the infected pets and watch the mayhem ensue. Yea so that was my dork moment for today.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corrupted_Blood

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    MeatyMcBeef, 21 Aug 2007 @ 9:32am

    WoW

    This all sounds good on paper but there are just some emergencies you can't prepare for with a study. Most WoW players are usually above average intelligence and below average social skills(hence the avoidance of Real Life Interaction for it's digital counterpart). It's the equivalent of simulating a virus spreading at MIT and assuming the rest of the world will react like they do.

    Besides there is already a plague involved with WoW, bedsores from 16 hours of continuous play. Now if you could only monetize it...Blizzard you're a sack of greedy sack loving bastards.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      The infamous Joe, 21 Aug 2007 @ 9:48am

      Re: WoW

      Most WoW players are usually above average intelligence and below average social skills(hence the avoidance of Real Life Interaction for it's digital counterpart).

      Okay, this is woefully off topic, but I have to know where this data is coming from. I can't find *any* intuitive connection between intelligence and playing Wow, and I dare say that in this day and age, social interaction *includes* online activity. I mean, in the real world I may interact with a few people I don't know a day, but online I can easily interact with dozens of people I don't know.

      Here's wikipedia's take on it, for your reading pleasure.

      So, I dare say, if anything, playing an online game like WoW increases social skills on the general level.

      Though, maybe I'm biased. :P

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    :, 21 Aug 2007 @ 9:40am

    Make the virus so that players walk slow and drop money/items. If the game were WoW, they'd have to make the dropped items visible on the ground.
    Regular players can run away from the infected's slow pace, but will be drawn in by the gold and items surrounding them.
    That way, intentionally spreading it would be bothersome to the player. However, because of all the items at the infected's feet, someone that knows no better is bound to walk into the trap.
    The spread of how the virus works through broadcasts/shouts/etc just factors into the study of public reaction. I'm sure folks in real life spread viruses while fully aware they have them, with the intent of infecting others.
    You could argue that virtual characters have nothing to lose, but their real life counterparts cannot be fully absolved from taking similar actions by virtue of their corporeal body alone. Some may feel that by contracting a real life virus, that they have nothing to live for. Therefore, resolving to spread it willingly.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      The infamous Joe, 21 Aug 2007 @ 9:57am

      Re:

      It would take about 42 seconds for someone to make a new character and spread the virus risk free, out of spite.

      It simply wouldn't work-- either the 'study' is not realistic, or Blizzard will piss off all 9 million of its paying customers. Maybe, just *maybe* on the test server, where (I assume) no one is there for any type of character gain, since everything is subject to deletion at any time.

      I have never played (if that is the proper term) Second Life, but maybe it would be more realistic there?

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 21 Aug 2007 @ 10:10am

        Re: Re:

        Maybe part of the grant money could go to those that manage to stay uninfected. A bonus, but lesser to the infected but alive. No reward for the incapacitated. Then there'd be some stake in it.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          :, 21 Aug 2007 @ 10:16am

          Re: Re: Re:

          In any case, it's still good research for an inevitable point in time where a metaverse is as ubiquitous as Google.
          If a virus gets lose there, real commerce, belongings, and information will be at stake. Hardly different from securing your computer from spyware. It'll be good to know well beforehand how people will react in such a situation where it's no longer just a game.

          link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 21 Aug 2007 @ 10:57am

        Re: Re:

        lvl requirement. boom done.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Eric the Grey, 21 Aug 2007 @ 12:36pm

        Re: Re:

        I was just thinking about Second Life while reading this article.

        Since the end-users create their own content, I'm wondering if something like this might be possible from their end.

        Create an "Object" that will automatically be transferred to any other character within a certain range (air-born). This object does nothing for the first 24 (game) hours, at which time, the character's skin turns blue. As long as the object is on the character, it can also pass on to anyone else...

        Someone else can create a "cure" which can be passed by giving it to another character.

        It would make an interesting test, since Second Life is quite a bit less of a fantasy world. I don't know about the griefing aspect of SL's game play, but I would think that it is much less than in other MMORPGs.


        EtG

        link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 21 Aug 2007 @ 9:54am

    Okay, this is woefully off topic, but I have to know where this data is coming from. I can't find *any* intuitive connection between intelligence and playing Wow, and I dare say that in this day and age, social interaction *includes* online activity. I mean, in the real world I may interact with a few people I don't know a day, but online I can easily interact with dozens of people I don't know.

    Here's wikipedia's take on it, for your reading pleasure.

    So, I dare say, if anything, playing an online game like WoW increases social skills on the general level.

    Though, maybe I'm biased. :P

    I have to agree. Wow is not like many other games where social misfits are the only players (see Dungeons and Dragons). It has turned out to by a very powerful social networking system. The demographics spans from kids in their early teens, to adults in their 60's. We were given the game as part of a team building exercise.

    Anyone who believes that socializing online promotes poor social skills has not observed the situation fully. I would say that the opposite is true, and socially dysfunctional people use the internet to meet other people on the same social level and actually develop better social skills.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Nick, 21 Aug 2007 @ 10:04am

    hmmm...

    I think that this would be very interesting to see, I don't play WOW but I think any kind of MMORPG like that can be used for a research ground.

    Maybe this is a turn for a new research...

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    RandomThoughts, 21 Aug 2007 @ 10:21am

    Not knowing anything about WoW, this could be an interesting study. We could find that a certain percentage lock themselves away, we could find that some that are infected stay away from others while others seek to spread the disease (kind of like the guy with the supposidly nasty strain of TB did)

    The study is less about the disease and more about how people would react to it.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Pro, 21 Aug 2007 @ 10:43am

    Modern or Medieval?

    is a 'plague' really a possibility in this day and age? Before modern communications, people had to communicate with other people to get news - and while someone was telling you how people were getting sick and dying, they were probably spraying plague all over you.

    Today, if there were a "plague", i'd hear about it via TV or internet and I wouldn't leave my house.

    An interesting twist to the WoW experiement would be to run it twice - once where they don't tell people, and another where they announce that it's happening. The difference could show that a modern day plague is less likely possible because of the lack of contact involved in information delivery.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      SLO, 21 Aug 2007 @ 11:16am

      Re: Modern or Medieval?

      In WoW there is an ingame mail system. Hmmmm in modern times has any 'plague' been spread through the mail. I can think of one.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Overcast, 21 Aug 2007 @ 10:54am

    I'm going to guess you have not played games since ATARI. Games have come along way since the days of 5 variables and 2 dimensions. In world of warcraft, I know that their different geographic regions support weather patterns and such already. Attributes such as wind and humidity are nothing but mathematical values that can be assigned to the world as a whole and influenced via correlation with weather variables. The results would be relatively accurate, since the really contagious viruses can only be spread through a few means

    No, actually I have been a video gamer since 1979, lol - and currently play Wow - but a fake 'rain' and the reality of how it impacts the environment are two different things - for instance, even at the most simple level - your character doesn't get wet, would we also have to take into consideration drought periods, hurricane season, tides, volcanic activity - what I'm saying is there is a practically limitless number of variables in the real world, as opposed to computer code that needs to be limited to run smoothly. I realize computers are more powerful now, of course..

    But in addition to that, in reality, we have no way of really measuring global precipitation. Sure we can say this area got 'about' an inch, but it's just that one spot, it may not reflect the true amount.

    But like I had mentioned, perhaps there may be a bit to be learned in terms of social engineering. But ok, I agree - the study is mainly about human reaction to it.

    But you do have to consider something else about WoW - people will know, at some point, Blizzard will give them a 'cure'. That may or may not happen in real life.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 21 Aug 2007 @ 11:05am

      Re:

      for instance, even at the most simple level - your character doesn't get wet, would we also have to take into consideration drought periods, hurricane season, tides, volcanic activity

      Although this is not graphically simulated, it can be done mathematically behind the scenes. A character can get a virus from the rain even though they do not look yet. A computer program can have virtually limitless variables. Im sure the global warming models have quite amount of them...

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Jeff, 21 Aug 2007 @ 11:05am

    HA

    I used to play WoW. Start a plague in the game and large numbers of people will infect other people just to do it and laugh ('cause it's funny), I dunno how likely it would be for people to do that in real life.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      :, 21 Aug 2007 @ 11:21am

      Re: HA

      The amount of time you have the virus or the effects of it could multiply with the number of people you've infected. So that someone intentionally infecting people would be made too burdened to continue doing so. That way, you don't want to catch or spread the virus. Combined with an incentive for survivors, only idiots would willingly contract it.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Jeff, 21 Aug 2007 @ 7:29pm

        Re: Re: HA

        Idiots, yes. But there will also be plenty of people who have a 70 of every race/class who are willing to waste the time dicking around on a lvl 30 making everyone sick. If I still played, I would fully engage in that sort of activity.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Snapper, 21 Aug 2007 @ 11:10am

    Give my time for research

    Do I want to give up my time and money for a researcher to infect my toon with what ever to see what I would do? If I get the month free maybe.
    Many have mentioned locking themselves away. Where? Hide in an instance? There isn't anywhere else you can go to hide/avoid other toons.
    Offer a way for people to grief others and they will take advantage.
    As for simulating air travel or other methods of transfer I really don't think the game has the hooks to make it work.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 21 Aug 2007 @ 11:14am

      Re: Give my time for research

      There is already air/boat travel where groups of players need to ride together...there is also a train...

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    RandomThoughts, 21 Aug 2007 @ 11:22am

    Pro, lock yourself away during a pandemic? What happens when your water, electricity, gas and food supply stops? Then what do you do?

    In today's world with instant global travel, a global pandemic is actually something that becomes more of a concern, because the spread rate becomes that much faster in a wider area.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Braylore, 21 Aug 2007 @ 11:37am

    stupid idea

    All this would do is make people not play the game until the "test" was over... what would that accomplish? I wouldn't login to play my character if I was going to be quarantined to an area.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      SLO, 21 Aug 2007 @ 11:47am

      Re: stupid idea

      Most research of this scope is conducted blind. Maybe you wouldnt know what was happening until you already have logged in. If you get infected the only way to cure it could be by going to the quarantined area...

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Thoughts, 21 Aug 2007 @ 11:56am

    Their are people who's whole life is WoW, it could work

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    anonymous, 21 Aug 2007 @ 11:56am

    Ridiculous

    How ridiculous.

    A) It would not mimic real life, your results would be specific to WOW.

    B) If you wanted to change parameters or otherwise make it more realistic, too bad, you're stuck with the interactions & limitations of WOW

    C) It would be realtime. That sucks... a good simulator could give you results faster than realtime & do a much better job.

    How did this make headlines? What a waste

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Overcast, 21 Aug 2007 @ 1:49pm

    Pro, lock yourself away during a pandemic? What happens when your water, electricity, gas and food supply stops? Then what do you do?

    See... in WoW none of that would 'matter'.. :) - There's no 'dire' need for food, water, power, or anything really. You could leave your character sit in place for 9 months and nothing would change - assuming you kept it from logging you out for inactivity and logged back in after patches.

    I could park myself in a off the wall place and fish for 6 months. If I wanted to - there would be no real reason, other than perhaps sanity to interact with others.

    Of course, if one went to the mountains and took up fishing - I suppose in the end, he could accomplish the same thing, lol

    Although - I find the test might give them some more statistics for more direct computer simulations. Perhaps they are looking for stats like:

    7% became hermits
    53% tried to avoid it, but went on with their affairs
    20% tried to spread it
    20% welcomed it

    Although, I may still question the real motive behind the government wanting this data, if used for the right reasons, I don't see any reason there wouldn't be some benefit from it.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Clueby4, 21 Aug 2007 @ 2:02pm

    Researchers? Sorry more like drooling feebs.

    As mentioned in previous comments; WoW players were intentionally spreading the effects so I don't see how it could translate into meaningful research. But maybe it just a scam to get some grant money.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 21 Aug 2007 @ 2:13pm

      Re: Researchers? Sorry more like drooling feebs.

      Your logic is flawed. You assume that a player in this 'hypothetical test' will possess the ability to actively transmit/even have knowledge that they are infected. There are many possibilities for the transmission of something.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        The infamous Joe, 21 Aug 2007 @ 3:02pm

        Re: Re: Researchers? Sorry more like drooling feeb

        Okay, so maybe they can't actively transmit the disease, but if it's spread in an 'airborne' way, then they can just hang around until it spreads, which is just as good. I don't even want to think about a different way to spread the disease. :)

        However, if no one in WoW even knows that they are infected, then you would get *zero* useful data, because unless they have a reason to avoid getting the disease (e.g., it causes some type of harm to the player) people will just ignore it and go about the game as usual.

        So, for it to work, they would have to 1) Give an incentive to *not* spread the disease and 2) Have this disease worth avoiding.

        I can't see any way to do that without pissing off the players.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Jimmy Z, 21 Aug 2007 @ 5:21pm

          Re: Re: Re: Researchers? Sorry more like drooling

          Agreed.

          The only way to get any real data from this type of experiment would be for Blizzard to not claim responsibility for it and let the community believe it's an actual virus. Also, the consequence for contracting the virus would have to be somewhat significant.

          Doing so would definitely piss a lot of people off and could possibly cause irreparable damage to their customer base. Being a former WoW player and Blizzard customer, I know first hand that they are scared shitless to do anything that would threaten their business model. Even if it makes perfect sense, much less something experimental.

          link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 21 Aug 2007 @ 2:07pm

    Old News

    It happened accidentally in 2005, and many people were discussing the value as a human behavior research tool.

    The main goal of such studies is usually to determine what emotions or thoughts influenced a persons' 'emergency response' reaction. Basically why the executed behavior of an individual varies from what they predicted their behavior to be (which tends to happen often in high pressure situations e.g. evacuating for a hurricane, response to fires/flooding/etc)

    As many people in WoW have a small emotional, and time vested, interest in their character many of these initial decision changing conditions are felt (if on a much smaller scale then reality).

    http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4946772

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Mike (profile), 22 Aug 2007 @ 2:04am

      Re: Old News

      It happened accidentally in 2005, and many people were discussing the value as a human behavior research tool.

      First of all, I mentioned that in the post.

      Second of all, what's new is these researchers actually working with Blizzard on it.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Eddy, 22 Aug 2007 @ 8:35am

    Account Infection

    The way to fix deliberate spreading of the Plague by people creating noobs to spread it while saving their Lvl 70's is to make it an account infection. E.g. On the one account Husband, Wife and 2 kids have multiple toons. Little Johnny gets bored and starts a noob character to spread the infection. In 24 hours the whole family's toons on that account have Sars. That is closer to real life and who is gonna spend money creating a new account and character to spread this. Although even in real life there are sicko's who probably would. Just reading the posts here gives an idea into the mentallity of some people.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Steph, 26 Sep 2007 @ 10:40pm

    Money and age issues.

    I wouldn't think Blizzard would impliment this. If they did, not for long at least. The reason being is if players get pissed off enough over a virus that severely inhibited their ability to play, they'd log out. If a cure was not easy to find and it got to where the entire time they were on the game they were actually unable to utilize the game's real purpose, then they would kill their accounts off. Blizzard could seriously loose millions of dollars from angry players who just choose to move on after so long of a virus afflicting them.

    I play WoW, and I'm not sure what I'd do myself. If I spent two weeks with a virus unable to do anything but sit and wait for it to end because the virus ruined my character to the point I couldn't even quest for a cure, then I would not even log on anymore, and would more than likely cancel my account until Blizzard decided to quit being retarded and cleaned everything up.

    I mean, come on, players on WoW freak out over 30second sever resets. One happened today to impliment voice chat and everyone was on all the world channels freaking out wondering what was going on, how long it was going to be down, why this or that.

    Not to mention the government has to take into account they have no idea how old the players are. The age range is just too vast to get accurate readings on how humans would react. Children play the game... how they act in the game is severely different than how they would under their parents if a real plague spread. Children aren't going to get scared and things like that if they are some hulking warrior on a game and they are safe in real life.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    brice nolan, 4 Oct 2007 @ 6:51am

    epidemics

    although wow would certanly give us an idea of what would happen it is fictional a computer sim. would prove more effective dut to the ablity to program real human defenses into the program thouhg in some ways it would give a semi-realistic idea. please responde
    Brice Nolan

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 23 Oct 2008 @ 8:22pm

    a) People in the World of Warcraft WANT to spread a plague to other characters, it's fun

    b) You can't run back to your corpse and resurrect in real life.

    If this is true the researchers are really silly.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.