Jury Out On The Impact Of 700 MHz Spectrum Auction Rules
from the new-spectrum-same-players dept
The talk around the upcoming 700 MHz spectrum license auctions continues. After Google's CEO earlier this week said the company would "probably" bid in the auction, even though the FCC didn't implement the open-access provisions Google wanted, a couple of divergent opinions on the auction's impact on the telecom landscape have come out. On the one hand, former FCC bigwig Blair Levin says the auction isn't likely to result in a new nationwide mobile operator; on the other, a "source at a major cellular company" says the auction isn't attractive for incumbent operators. Who to believe? As usual, the truth in somewhere in the middle, but we're more inclined to take Levin's view of things. Incumbent operators will likely shy away from the 22 MHz of spectrum with open-access rules -- not just because they don't want to operate under the restrictions, but also because if the auction for those licenses fails to generate $4.6 billion, the open-access rules will be lifted, and the auction will start over. Once it hits $4.6 billion on that first go-around, though, operators will bid because there's simply too much spectrum on offer to ignore it. Their choice of technology could render the open-access rules useless, really -- after all, if they pick a proprietary or unpopular technology for their network, they'll be the only people selling compatible devices for it. When you get down to brass tacks, the incumbent operators are going to spend whatever's necessary to acquire the spectrum, despite what anonymous sources within them say. Spectrum in general is their lifeblood, and this 700 MHz spectrum in particular has too many positive attributes for mobile broadband for them to pass up. They'll bid aggressively to defend their turf, and if anybody is going to unseat them, it's going to take a hell of a lot of investment.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: fcc, open access, spectrum, wireless
Companies: at&t, frontline, google, sprint, t-mobile, verizon
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
700mhz spectrum
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 700mhz spectrum
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I wonder
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
700MHz dipole antenna = 2cm(1inch)
700MHz is high enough frequency/small enough wavelength to slide thru must building material walls (except steel).
But with that high frequency comes very little bend.
Transmitter will not be able to reach very far beyond the horizon so mostly 'near' line of sight. Not much use for rural since Person/Tower is so low, not enough profit.
Always the case, urban, near urban and some suburban areas could benefit.
Finally, it is the bandwidth of the 700MHz signal that will define the bits/second due to most modulation techniques used today.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Build out requirements
Google just wants to lobby and make sure that their web services are accessible to consumers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]