FCC Cracks Down On E911 Violations? Yeah, Right
from the the-best-kind-of-deadline dept
The FCC has announced that it wants to fine three mobile operators a total of $2.825 million (a staggering figure, we know) for their continued failure to meet E911 standards. The rules said that by the end of 2005, operators had to be able to locate 95% of their subscribers within a certain distance when they called 911, and these operators still haven't met the standard, apparently -- thanks in part to their use of handset-based location technology, and a good number of users who haven't upgraded their phones. Surely the FCC fines will make them move, right? Because all the other meaningless fines the FCC's doled out have really worked. While the FCC tries to look tough by "cracking down" on the operators, plenty of places still don't have 911 call centers that can actually use the location information -- in part because they frittered away the funds that were supposed to pay for call center upgrades on ballpoint pens and winter boots.![Hide This Hide this](https://ii.techdirt.com/s/t/i/topclose.png)
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Bwahahaha
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
FCC Cracks Down On E911 Violations
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: states were busy frittering
The fact is as stated - the mobile operators are in violation.
It's true whether or not some (or all) of the states did not fulfill their own responsibilities. You tried to change the subject - a cheap trick.
I'm beginning to get the feeling that this blog is being systematically used to promote the interests of big business and monopolies.
Does anyone else get that impression?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: states were busy frittering
Um...no?
The FCC obviously has it's own agenda, they have rolled back the deadline several times. This penalty, while both trivial and pointless from both sides perspective, makes points in the media culture that Big Government is out to protect The Little Guy by making Big Business toe the line. Please. All they're doing is getting a blurb in the news so people think that they're doing something.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: states were busy frittering
"I'm beginning to get the feeling that this blog is being systematically used to promote the interests of big business and monopolies.
Does anyone else get that impression?"
OMFG! Are you kidding me? Read any 5 stories in a row on this blog and tell me what proportion supports big business and which doesn't. Chances are one or two will support, one or two will slam, and one or two will do neither.
Get a grip. The balance on this blog is one of the things that makes it rise above the rest. We're neither corporate fanboys, nor anarchists. We're neither nazis nor socialists. We believe that corporations can do great things, but that they can also make mistakes and do bad things.
I promise you that as a full-time consultant, and a part-time writer on this blog, my willingness to criticize corporations HAS cost me clients. Yet some people (like Techdirt writers) just want to speak the truth, and hope that some people will appreciate that.
Thanks a lot for being one of those people.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
When I said that I suspected the blog was being "used to promote the interests of big business", etc. I was not referring to the TechDirt writers.
I was referring to some people who posted comments.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: states were busy frittering
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Let me get this straight...
That's crap!
The fines should have been handed out in Jan 06.
Punishment is nowhere near as effective unless it is applied when violation the happened.
Nice going, FCC.
Way to stay abreast of things.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
E911 is a lot like USF
Take a look at your phone bill, you get reamed monthly for E911. So there's really no excuse, just like lack of rural coverage with the existence of the USF funding. Where's that money going? Why are we still being charged?
Me, I think it the same old story, companies not investing in there infrastructure. And the same tire old mantra of the greedy, don't build your infrastructure to accommodate 100% usage. While I have little sympathy for the "realities" of that, I will acknowledge it a pretty hard goal to meet, so perhaps some legislation and/or regulation to SEVERELY PUNISH companies when their, obviously low-balled, capacity threshold affects their users.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No need to upgrade
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No need to upgrade
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Get The Facts
"Take a look at your phone bill, you get reamed monthly for E911."
Yes, the mobile phone bill has a monthly fee attached to it for E911 funding. It's a different amount in different states. So you're pissed at the telcos for assessing you that fee and not doing their duty? Well, surprise, that is a government assessted tax which the gov't requires the telco to collect for it. That money gets passed straight to gov't for the purpose of funding the E911 improvements in the Emergency Response Call Centers. Yeah, that's right, the telcos are supposed to fund their own E911 improvements, then collect a tax to give to the gov't to fund their improvements. Then the gov't frittered away those funds by spending on other items like police boots, pens, uniforms as Carlos said. See:
http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20030613/144448.shtml
Yes, get angry. Just get angry at the right people.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Analog Phones Are SAFER In Some Rural Areas
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You guys are missing the Big Picture
The only emergency benefit is when there is an emergency, the only person to call 911 uses a cell phone and that person (and everyone with him) is too clueless to know where he is.
On the other hand, resistance is REALLY futile if Big Brother knows where everyone is and can (and as we are finding out does) easily listen in on every telephonic communication.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Analog Phones Are SAFER In Some Rural Areas
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Analog Phones Are SAFER In Some Rural Areas
This is a CONSUMER CHOICE. And not a bad one. Think about it: would you rather be in a car wreck and have an analog phone which CAN make a 911 call, or a digital phone which COULD HAVE made a 911 call with GPS data, but can't get a signal?
The government isn't trying to push around Sprint or Alltel, they are trying to force decisions on citizens so that they can find out where you are.
The CDMA carriers should only be required to send their analog customers a very clear letter about the risk and trade-offs they are making by using an analog phone, which requires a confirmation from the user that they choose and accept these risks.
AN ASIDE:
The GSM carriers use network TRILATERATION to determine handset location (people who call it triangulation are wrong). With 3 or more towers in range, this works. But it doesn't work when fewer than 3 towers are in range, and it offers less accuracy than aGPS. So both solutions have their pros and cons.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Get your facts right!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Another case in the NYC area, some guy got mugged, beaten and left for dead. He called from his cell phone but couldn't tell emergency workers where he was. It was winter, so of course, he died.
As for the triangulation, what happens when your signal is only hitting 1 tower?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]