Business 2.0 Finally Dead... For Real This Time
from the how-very-un-2.0 dept
Business 2.0 has gone through a variety of changes over the years. I still remember when it launched to great fanfare (and silly mysterious billboards along Highway 101) in 1998. At the time, no one could figure out why the world needed another tech business magazine, when pretty much everyone was perfectly satisfied with Wired, Red Herring and Upside. Of course, soon afterwards even more tech business magazines started to show up, including Time Warner's horribly named eCompanyNow and the popular Industry Standard (which launched at about the same time as Business 2.0, if I remember correctly). With the dot com bubble still inflating, these magazines soon were thick with ads, but people began ignoring them, as the articles tended to get worse and worse. Then the the dot com bubble burst, and many of the magazines went out of business in a flash, including The Industry Standard, Red Herring and Upside. Business 2.0 put itself up for sale, hoping to avoid the fate of the others. Time Warner "bought" it, but really just slapped the Business 2.0 name on eCompanyNow -- which had never picked up much of a following.Then, just as the magazine was starting to get to the point that it was worth paying attention to, the powers that be at Time Warner did the very-un-2.0 move of locking up all Business 2.0 content for non-subscribers -- effectively ensuring that most folks paid little to no attention to the magazine for many years, until the company finally realized that it helps to have readers online and took down the pay wall. While the magazine did some good reporting (and had hired some top-notch reporters) during all of this time, it really was too little too late, as the magazine had missed its prime opportunity to become a voice that matters online. So, it comes as little surprise after all these years that Time Warner is finally shuttering the operation completely, and moving a few remaining staff members over to Fortune Magazine. In the end, it's really rather unfortunate (or ironic?) that a magazine called Business 2.0 never quite figured out the 2.0 business model it needed to survive.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: tech magazines
Companies: business 2.0
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Business 2.0
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
These guys pretty much lock up their content. Teasers of course, but still locked up.
At times, I think the web is overated, at least for business to business. There are senior executives out there that don't read their emails, much less browse the web.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Because It's the same business
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Impact to Subscribers?
I wonder what rag they'll substitute for B2.0?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]