Why Does Capgemini Need An Agreement With Google To Push Google Apps?
from the just-wondering... dept
The media is having a field day with the news that IT consulting firm Capgemini has come to an agreement with Google to push Google's online apps into enterprise customers. It's true, as many of the stories point out, that this is a huge win for Google, and is likely to help increase adoption of its apps within the enterprise. However, what's not clear and not explained is why the two companies needed an agreement first. As the article notes, it appears that there were financial considerations in the agreement as well. If anything, this should call into question Capgemini's impartiality in recommending apps to its customers. If Google Apps is the best solution, then shouldn't Capgemini support it with or without an agreement? Waiting until the two companies have an agreement (and announcing that fact) just makes it sound like Capgemini's recommendations are going to be based on who paid them some money, rather than on what's the best solution for customers.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: google apps, saas
Companies: capgemini, google
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
when i had to get braces as a teenager, my dentist referred me to an orthodontist. no doubt he got a taste of the resulting profits. makes the world go round.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
If they did give her a payment for each case, I at least would see that as a corrupting influence. At least by giving payment in kind, if everyone does this she is encouraged to refer people to the best orthodontists, rather than those with largest profit margins.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Welcome
Waiting until the two companies have an agreement (and announcing that fact) just makes it sound like Capgemini's recommendations are going to be based on who paid them some money, rather than on what's the best solution for customers.
Welcome to Corporate Back Scratching 101.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Here is why
Projects that pretty much went nowhere, but alive:
Froogle
Google Base
Google Checkout
Google Answers (dead)
Google Video (paid version cancelled)
Google Groups (didn't turn up to be what everyone hoped)
Google Pages ""
Google Finance
Dodgeball and many other random acquired projects.
YouTube will be forgotten and turned into a small video-blogging niche site within 3-4 years, if the real content owners will do the right thinng and pull all non-user-generated content off it, and liscence it to Joost.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
CapGemini? Google must not have been able to find any other consulting company to sign on.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Duh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]