Financial Times Frees Some Of Its Content, Sort Of
from the set-it-free dept
Earlier this summer, we suggested that the Financial Times could beat the Wall Street Journal to the punch by differentiating itself by freeing up its content. Now that the WSJ is expected to remove its paywall, Financial Times has announced that it would remove the paywall for its online content by allowing casual readers free access up to 30 articles for free each month. First time visitors to FT are rewarded with freely available content. After five articles, registration is required, and then after 30, access is cut off. So, according to Pavlov, the Financial Times wants to discourage heavy users of its content by making it more difficult to use the more that they use it -- not exactly a good business move.So, sure, the FT has a loyal subscriber base today, but the current paywall model does not encourage growth. By offering all of their content for free, they can grow their reader base into avid readers, a percent of which can then be converted to subscribers. By no means should they give up on subscriber revenue; they just need to give subscribers a good reason to pay. FT already offers access to tomorrow's paper as a benefit to subscribing -- this is a good example of a premium good. Give subscribers more of these types of benefits: from custom reports to events and conferences, and they will continue to be loyal paying customers. As we've said time and time again, "free" is a vital part of an online media business model and not something to be feared, but rather, it should be embraced.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: paywall
Companies: financial times
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Incredibly stupid
My browser of choice will handle this as an automatic task, per site, if I tell it to. Possibly many browsers can do this, but a manual deletion of the cookie is easy in all browsers that I am aware of.
So all they will notice is a real jump in first time visitors, that seem never to come back again...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Reading this just
Most businesses in this area just seem scared to completely give up content for free without restriction.
Personally, if something only lets me get part of what I want without subscription, I go elsewhere for the full thing with no hassle
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Financial Times Frees Some Of Its Content
This is a no-brainer.
Most people including me get their news from online and most of the news sources are free.
So why would anyone pay Financial Times or WSJ for news it can get free. It is good they have finally woke up to the reality
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A Business model based on increasing
The more you visit, the more often you get an in-your-face fist-in-the-velvet request to join, sign-up, opt-in.
I smell BugMeNot.com intervention; oh and of course the cookie delete option works too.
I suggest a two-tiered approach.
Finance is different from general news in that people will pay for content that could help them avoid loosing money (and help make them money, but we are creatures that are more pain adverse than pleasure attract).
I still believe there is someone out there who will build a sustainable business on paid subscription services.
If you need a past model that was successful, look at cable television. HBO and their ilk grew rich on paid subscription of fixed no-choice service.
To make HBO subscription service money, you must have the cable TV playground. Only then can you charge for admission to the more desirable areas.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm a little a confused...
So, sure, the FT has a loyal subscriber base today, but the current paywall model does not encourage growth. By offering all of their content for free, they can grow their reader base into avid readers, a percent of which can then be converted to subscribers. By no means should they give up on subscriber revenue; they just need to give subscribers a good reason to pay.
Okay I've read this a part a few times and I'm still lost. You encourage the FT to offer all of its content for free in order to boost subscription revenue. But if its all free then what are they subscribing to?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I'm a little a confused...
hmmmm.....maybe he is referring to huge pieces of paper with letters on them that are sold at newstands and in machines???
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I'm a little a confused...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No hate towards them, I understand what they want to accomplish, but usually finding an alternate source is as easy as clicking 'back' and hitting the next search finding.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]