When Your Backup Brain (i.e., Technology) Takes On Primary Memory Functions
from the i'd-say-it's-bad,-but-my-computer-disagrees... dept
For years, we've talked about the idea that computers and the internet are becoming something of a backup or second brain. The more we use these technologies, the more we allow them to remember stuff for us -- knowing we can always track down that information. In fact, Clive Thompson's latest column is about how the generation of kids growing up online tend not to remember little things that older generations definitely remember, like phone numbers and birthdays. Why remember those things when they're easily stored away and easily accessed thanks to technology? While Thompson talks about how nice it is that he can feel much smarter while he's connected, he also worries that it makes him "mentally crippled" when not connected. There may be something to that idea. After all, a few years ago there was a story about Steve Mann, a professor who had been living his life with a wearable computing system for 20 years. At an airport, he was forced to take the apparatus off and immediately had trouble functioning normally. He had become so reliant on the technological enhancements, that being without them left him somewhat crippled. While few people will have reached that point, it's certainly suggestive of what happens if we become too reliant on those external backup brains. That's not to say we shouldn't be using technology for this purpose -- or even that it's not a good thing. However, we should be aware of what it means and potentially the impact should it go away (temporarily or permanently).
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: human computer interaction, memory
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Remembering and Thinking
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I can't spell very well without a keyboard, it's not the spell checking, it's the learned key strokes. But the same thing is true with a lot of people who have to write down a word to work out how to spell it.
If lost my internet connection Iwould have difficulty doing certain things, but if I lost an arm I'd also have difficulty. In both cases the difficulty wouldn't last long because I would adapt to not rely on something I didn't have.
It's currently not very likely that the internet is going to go away anytime soon, and if it did then we'd have much worse things to be worried about than not remembering birthdays.
I'm sure after afew days Steve Mann would have gotten used to functioning without his wearable computer equipment.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
When Your Backup Brain (i.e., Technology) Takes On
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: When Your Backup Brain (i.e., Technology) Take
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
so...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: so...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It makes sense
I used to remember phone numbers, now the only ones I remember are my work and my mobile, and only 'cause people ask me for them all the time. I mean, who even uses a phone? I'm more likely to remember an IP.
I don't need to remember things, I just need to remember processes. I know how to find the information I need, and I know how to assemble that into a larger whole with the other things I find. Short term memory has become medium-term: It's there just long enough to finish something, and if I need to come back to it a year later, I'm learning it all over again. But fast!
I don't remember PHP commands. I remember where I found them last time. I don't remember phone numbers, I remember how to work my phone, and I intuit how to work someone else's if the need arises. I don't remember passwords, my browser does that for me and I remember how to reset it if the browser breaks.
It's all about the processes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RE: so...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
In the modern-day context? some people have 2 or numbers to their name - as if email addresses weren't difficult enough to remember, now we have to know the contents of our SIM cards as well? Give the human brain a break...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Do I need to remember a load of facts ?
So if my kids can't remember any historical dates but can find them on demand, that's fine by me. As an old engineering management tutor told me, "I won't teach you everything, but I'll teach you how to find anything within 3 phone calls". Obviously the modern day equivalent of that is "using Google".
There's a definite modern day skill to using tech to find things or to store things so you can find them again.
I have several gigs of digital photos :
- are they backed up ?
- Can I find the ones I want easily ?
I have shedloads of passwords etc on my palm
- is it encrypted ?
- is it backed up ?
- if my palm is stolen/dropped/lost do I have a reserve palm or could I restore the data to something else I could go out and buy soon ? (no use relying on a dead platform)
This is the "process" stuff of today that the new generation needs to be able to do. If they can do this well, they will have far more at their disposal than folks used to, and they'll be less stressed about it.
My only worry with today's direction is that the pervasive availability of search is eroding people's ability to categorise or file things in an organised way (after all, why bother ?)
I'm not sure I can yet paste a pic of my daughter into Google Desktop and say "search all my digital pics for more of her" so for now I need to put some effort into categorising pictures. But that day will come.
There are certainly tools to index sound files by keywords using voice recognition (I'm sure dhs.gov own them...)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Even college
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Even college
Sometimes being able to spit out info is important, but usually you specifically prepare for it ahead of time before an event, and you memorize info that you need to know. Afterwards, if you find you no longer need it, you forget the specifics but you remember enough to quickly re-learn it if needed. It's sorta like remembering everything for an exam, and forgetting it afterwards.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Even college
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I believe that the answer isn't to reject computers as a "second brain" entirely, but rather be realistic about what to rely on them for. For example, there's no way I could remember all the phone numbers for the contacts in my cell phone address book. However, I remember the few most important ones, so if that phone dies or gets lost or stolen, I can use any other phone to get a hold of the people I need. Same thing with PCs. I already remember way too much trivial information, and there's no way I can remember it all. I keep the most important things, or the things I do most often, in my head, and leave the rest on the computer or notes to refer to later as necessary.
But, I will agree that somebody who is disconnected from his computer and cannot function normally has a serious problem, and needs psychiatric help of some sort. That's about as bad as that commercial where these people are walking down the street, one guy guided solely by his GPS smart phone. Somebody pulls it from his hand, and he stops and looks around with a blank stare, like his brain just got turned off. Then it is given back to him, and he picks right up where he left off. It makes for a good chuckle, but in real life it would be a serious problem.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hmmm
Learning the data is better in situations where performing the process would take longer then just recalling the data (As a man who plans ahead, I got the important stuff down)
These claims have been made since the invention of the written word.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
> put men in missiles to do the math required to get to the
> target because they had become so reliant upon technology
Isaac Asimov, "The Feeling of Power"
"Yes. Well, Dr. Shuman tells me that in theory there is nothing the computer can do that the human mind cannot do. The computer merely takes a finite amount of data and performs a finite number of operations upon them. Then human mind can duplicate the process."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/vl/notes/asimov.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
when technology attacks
if your little gadget tells you what to do and where to go, you are no longer the boss. sci-fi types call this "technological singularity", where the technology evolves past humans. technology is still dependent on humans, making it just as fallible as any human.
case in point: i do IT for a bunch of doctors, and they all use their treos to keep track of thier schedules. this was just great until the daylight savings time fiasco last year.
we had docs showing up hours early to meetings and missing appointments and all hell broke loose. the blame shifts squarely to the IT group because everything with a microchip is our fault.
i had to gently explain that it's ok to second guess your phone. if you are not sure if the little box is correct, contact a human to double check... i.e. your secretary.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]