Recording Industry Innovating Like It's 1999
from the deja-vu dept
Two developments this week suggest that the recording industry is finally taking baby steps in the direction of a genuinely competitive online music market, but the progress continues to be painfully slow. First, Apple is cutting prices on DRM-free music in an apparent bid to stay competitive with Amazon's launch of a DRM-free music store last month. This is a particularly interesting development because just last year, the talk was about whether Apple would increase prices on iTunes songs. But now it's looking like further price cuts are more likely to be in the cards. Even Amazon's 89 cent price point is still a lot more expensive than eMusic, which charges around 33 cents per song. Meanwhile, Napster has unveiled a new web-based version of its music store that appears to allow people to listen to their music in their web browsers, including non-Windows PCs. The new Napster will also make it easier for you to embed your favorite music YouTube-style on other websites. Those are great new features, but it appears that the service will still require people to use Microsoft's comically-named (and increasingly irrelevant) PlaysForSure platform if they want to listen to their music on a mobile device, which is quite a handicap in an iPod-dominated market.It's becoming increasingly clear that the recording industry shot itself in the foot when it sued MP3.com into bankruptcy in 2000. Many of the "new" features sites like Amazon and Napster are touting today—web-based access, DRM-free files—are just warmed-over versions of the functionality consumers could get from MP3.com almost a decade ago. Imagine how much more vibrant the online music market would be today if the labels had treated sites like MP3.com as a potential revenue source rather than a competitive threat.
Filed Under: innovation, recording industry
Companies: apple, napster, riaa
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Ok
[ link to this | view in thread ]
What's fair is fair, right?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
eMusic
Aaaargh! eMusic is only 33 cents per track if you download the absolute maximum every month.
Sorry to get all hyperventilated about that, but I'm really sick of people quoting it like it's a flat fee. The one thing that stood between me and DRM-free electronic music for a long time was not having time to listen to 75 tracks per month...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
MP3.com
[ link to this | view in thread ]
And what about the others?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: eMusic
Erm, then why not subscribe to the basic 30 tracks/month package?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
New music business model:
I think www.sellaband.com is pretty damn close. Free 260kbps mp3's from their new albums, and other tracks only 50c each.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]