Ding Dong, DirectRevenue Is Dead
from the apparently-it's-tough-to-make-money-being-legit dept
DirectRevenue was considered one of the worst adware/spyware firms out there for many years. The company was famous for changing names every time people started to figure out how sleazy the company's marketing techniques were, and then repeatedly claiming it had cleaned up its practice of sneaky installs when the reality was that it kept doing the same thing. Eventually, the company was sued and paid a $1.5 million fine -- significantly less than the $28 million in profits the firm's founders apparently had made (and the $80 million the company had brought in over the years). Either way, now that the lawsuits appear to be done, and the fact that it's pretty difficult to make any money in that business without surreptitious installs, the company is shutting down. I'm sure the founders who walked away with all that money aren't too upset by it, however.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: adware, spyware
Companies: directrevenue
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They will be back
These types can't just take the money and run, they are continually thinking "out of the box" to create that next great scam.
As the article stated above, a fine does nothing. Unless prison is involved for the principles, they will be back.
I worked in the past for many of these types of companies and we were always moving to a new location, changing the business name, running new advertisements, changing the phone numbers, etc.
Kevin Trudaeu is another example. The FTC rules he misleads customers with his advertising yet they only give him a fine and and he comes right back.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: They will be back
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Max is right, of course; they WILL be back
an ex-spammer; neither is there, apparently, any such thing as
an ex-spyware vendor. (Of course, sometimes they're the same
people, cf Spamford.)
And why should they stop, anyway? The worst that will happen
to them is a mere slap on the wrist, a pitifully inadequate fine
extracted years later (if at all). With millions to be made, and
inconsequential risk, they have every reason to continue.
Which is why the only reasonable response on our part is to
blacklist them (their domains, their networks, etc.) forever....
regardless of how many times they apologize, promise to
reform, etc.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Direct Revenue and Media6
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
newest jordan shoes
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]