Leopard Illustrates Another Way To Compete With Free
from the reliability-is-valuable dept
You often hear people in copyright debates claim that you "can't compete with free." We've tried to explain why that's wrong: In fact companies find ways to compete with free all the time. The latest example comes via Wired's David Kravets, who points out that Apple's latest OS is all over BitTorrent. People who want to avoid giving Apple its $129 can visit their favorite BitTorrent search engine and download the new operating system free of charge. Yet apparently, some of the same people who were downloading bootleg copies of the OS earlier this week will head to their local Apple Store tonight to pick up a legitimate copy. "If you're going to use a system to run your life, you're less likely to take chances with an illegitimate copy," says BigChampagne's Eric Garland. Being sure your computer isn't running a defective or compromised version of Mac OS X is worth $129 to a lot of people. Of course, that's not a new insight. One of Red Hat's most lucrative products is its software subscription service, which allows companies to pay money in order to guarantee the software they get will be stable, secure, and will work well together. Red Hat's customers could download the software themselves and roll their own version of Red Hat, but for many companies it's just not the risk that they'd miss a critical bugfix or security patch.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: competing with free, free, leopard, operating systems
Companies: apple
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
When I see a new car that I like I just steal it. I'll drive it around for a few days just to test it out. You know, see how well the car handles corners at 90 MPH, check if the backseat is actually comfortable enough for sex, etc.
When I'm done with it I ALWAYS return it. If I think the car is a sound investment and well worth my money, I march right down to the dealership and hand over my hard-earned cash.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Making a bit for bit copy of a file on another computer does not deprive the owner of the file of any property. It is not the same as stealing.
Given the fact that copying is so quick, painless (usually) and accessible, its not even fair to assume that the infinging person would have paid for the content in the first place. You cannot consider it a lost sale, and hope to have any kind of accurate account of the "money lost".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not the majority
I'm not arguing against "competing with free" but the majority of users that download and burn their copy rather than purchasing aren't likely to purchase the real deal. Most are just people who either don't realize the difference, don't realize its illegal, or don't give a crap.
The technically literate group of downloaders are the only ones that will download to try it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Funny analogy.
When I was shopping for a car all the places I went to were quite happy to let me take it for a drive first.
Now imagine if the car market were controlled by three or four big dealerships, and none of them would let you take any of the cars for a test drive. Imagine if lending your friend your own car was considered 'stealing', or letting friends take a ride, or picking up hitchhikers.. Imagine if they even tried really hard to cut out the second-hand car market, so the only way you could buy a car was brand-new, you don't even open the doors until it's been paid for.
That would suck.
That's about how most of us here view the Music and/or Movie Industries. And Microsoft too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Both
Ultimately, I believe it comes down to price and honor. Those with honor will try the software and go purchase it (if it suits their needs). Those with less honor (or lacking altogether) will probably just pirate the software (always).
Then there are those in between, that try it and like it and pay for it (dependent on price) if they can afford it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
On the other hand Windows which is genuinely a complete original OS for about the same price.
Apple is taking a free product from others and selling relative to a pricepoint set by M$ for a genuine product, then keeping the money themselves.
That's quite clever in greedy corporate kind of way but it's not good for consumers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
i guess i'm just a regular criminal...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: i guess i'm just a regular criminal...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]